You can't say they don't deserve it - they're clearly the better performing team.Randle McMurphy wrote:Well the Mariners pass us tonight.
Sent from my SM-S908W using RealGM mobile app
Moderator: JaysRule15
You can't say they don't deserve it - they're clearly the better performing team.Randle McMurphy wrote:Well the Mariners pass us tonight.
Randle McMurphy wrote:So Gibbons got the biggest cheer before Bautista came out (other than maybe Edwin). The perspective of having two awful managers since then.
canz55 wrote:You can't say they don't deserve it - they're clearly the better performing team.Randle McMurphy wrote:Well the Mariners pass us tonight.
Sent from my SM-S908W using RealGM mobile app
Randle McMurphy wrote:Cyrus wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:I’m no real fan of Chapman and have no desire to bring him back at his age, but he’s undeniably one of the most valuable players on this team right now and replacing him with unproven minor leaguers (who are struggling in AAA right now) is a massive downgrade.
They could re-sign Whit but I’d also think that is unlikely given their internal options at 2B. Kiermaier is a bad fit on a team that already has an elite fielding/no hit CF so he’s definitely gone.
This team looks quite clearly to be getting worse in the offseason.
Whit has i believe a team option at 18 or 19 mill, they won't do better in fa market, plus he has position versatility, so I'm pretty sure they'll pick it up.
And forget Chapman, whether he's important part of this year team, he's gonna be 32 next year already at 30+ k rate, which will likely go up as he ages. Would you want to give a 5 year 150 mill deal. With all that, I'd rather give an unproven rookie a chance, hopefully he doesn't k at 30% rate
Not a chance they're giving Whit Merrifield 18M a year at age 35. He's almost certainly gone.
The Jays also clearly shouldn't sign Chapman, but that doesn't mean they aren't gonna downgrade significantly at that position when he goes.
tripa wrote:Keep the same energy
dagger wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:Cyrus wrote:
Whit has i believe a team option at 18 or 19 mill, they won't do better in fa market, plus he has position versatility, so I'm pretty sure they'll pick it up.
And forget Chapman, whether he's important part of this year team, he's gonna be 32 next year already at 30+ k rate, which will likely go up as he ages. Would you want to give a 5 year 150 mill deal. With all that, I'd rather give an unproven rookie a chance, hopefully he doesn't k at 30% rate
Not a chance they're giving Whit Merrifield 18M a year at age 35. He's almost certainly gone.
The Jays also clearly shouldn't sign Chapman, but that doesn't mean they aren't gonna downgrade significantly at that position when he goes.
You can decline the option and see if Whit will negotiate for a different lower price. No one is going to pay him big money
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Randle McMurphy wrote:tripa wrote:Keep the same energy
You too.
tripa wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:tripa wrote:Keep the same energy
You too.
Youre blocked, so I wont find out if you do after this post.
Ranger One wrote:Varsho and swinging at the high fastball and missing horribly. At this point id just order my pitchers to throw him exclusively high heaters if i was an opposing manager and beg him to beat me.
johanliebert wrote:Ranger One wrote:Varsho and swinging at the high fastball and missing horribly. At this point id just order my pitchers to throw him exclusively high heaters if i was an opposing manager and beg him to beat me.
That’s what every team has done for months.
Raider917 wrote:not pinch hitting jansen for kirk and belt for biggio tells me you dont even want to win
Raider917 wrote:not pinch hitting jansen for kirk and belt for biggio tells me you dont even want to win