Moderator: JaysRule15
Top10alltime wrote:rapstarter wrote:Top10alltime wrote:
Why does Vladdy have a better postseason than Ohtani this year, let alone all time
Because he has?
You can say anything you want, but it isn't one of the choices unless you provide evidence, which is what I'm asking for.
WuTang_CMB wrote:Schneider wont change the lineup.
they are going to be aggressive on kirby early. i hope we can capitalize
Top10alltime wrote:pingpongrac wrote:Top10alltime wrote:
With all due respect to Vladi, Ohtani wipes the floor with him. He had one of the best series of all-time in the Brewers series, and was solid throughout the rest. It's clear that even with how strong Toronto is, Dodgers are clearly better and winning this in 4/5.
Ohtani: .220 BA, .333 OBP, .634 SLG, 7 R, 9 RBI, 19 K in 48 PA
Vladdy: .462 BA, .532 OBP, 1.000 SLG, 11 R, 12 RBI, 2 K in 47 PA
Aside from the HRs (of which Ohtani hit all 5 of his in 2 games), Vladdy is almost doubling up Ohtani's numbers in practically identical plate appearances lol. Even if you consider the 2.25 ERA and 19 K in 12 innings that Ohtani has pitched, Vladdy easily clears him so far this postseason. This has been a generational individual run, and hopefully it continues for at least another week.
So he's a better offensive player, that's nice. Don't forget, there's two sides. But glad you out in proof.
I'll rethink my statements...
Tripod wrote:Top10alltime wrote:pingpongrac wrote:
Ohtani: .220 BA, .333 OBP, .634 SLG, 7 R, 9 RBI, 19 K in 48 PA
Vladdy: .462 BA, .532 OBP, 1.000 SLG, 11 R, 12 RBI, 2 K in 47 PA
Aside from the HRs (of which Ohtani hit all 5 of his in 2 games), Vladdy is almost doubling up Ohtani's numbers in practically identical plate appearances lol. Even if you consider the 2.25 ERA and 19 K in 12 innings that Ohtani has pitched, Vladdy easily clears him so far this postseason. This has been a generational individual run, and hopefully it continues for at least another week.
So he's a better offensive player, that's nice. Don't forget, there's two sides. But glad you out in proof.
I'll rethink my statements...
Vlad also plays the 2nd side. He has been great defensively.
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
LLJ wrote:The Jays have been the better team for like 35 out of the last 36 innings. That 1 bad inning hurts a lot. Hope they can make it a moot point by winning this.
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
SharoneWright wrote:Springer, Lukes, Guerrero, Barger, Clement, Varsho, Kirk, Schneider, Gimenez
Boom
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
SharoneWright wrote:Springer, Lukes, Guerrero, Barger, Clement, Varsho, Kirk, Schneider, Gimenez
Boom
! ! 
!
While literally getting nothing to hit.DelAbbot wrote:
It's not set in stone yet. Bonds had 259 wRC+ (.356/.581/.978) in 2002 playoffs, including WS
SharoneWright wrote:Barger should be back in the 4 spot.
dh_45 wrote:I just watched the replay of the game. Instead of walking vladdy Brash intentionally hit Vladdy on the elbow. They are lucky they didn't injured him.
Last game I believe they intentionally hit Springer.
