LoveMyRaps wrote:Idiotic me actually believed we were about to land a big name free agent. LMAO
Darvish
Soto
Ohtani
Sasaki
...now Tucker?
They just gave the best pitcher on the market 200M like a week ago
Moderator: JaysRule25
LoveMyRaps wrote:Idiotic me actually believed we were about to land a big name free agent. LMAO
Darvish
Soto
Ohtani
Sasaki
...now Tucker?

PushDaRock wrote:LoveMyRaps wrote:Worst part about this Alonso news is that.... Mets are gonna get desperate now and overpay for Tucker.
Say good-bye to Tucker to Jays.
Welcome back Bo.
Why wouldn't they have just gotten desperate and "overpaid" for Alonso if they were going to do that?
They didn't want to go more than 3 years for Alonso but will back up the truck for Tucker? Doesn't make too much sense.

LoveMyRaps wrote:Idiotic me actually believed we were about to land a big name free agent. LMAO
Darvish
Soto
Ohtani
Sasaki
...now Tucker?
Cyrus wrote:PushDaRock wrote:LoveMyRaps wrote:Worst part about this Alonso news is that.... Mets are gonna get desperate now and overpay for Tucker.
Say good-bye to Tucker to Jays.
Welcome back Bo.
Why wouldn't they have just gotten desperate and "overpaid" for Alonso if they were going to do that?
They didn't want to go more than 3 years for Alonso but will back up the truck for Tucker? Doesn't make too much sense.
Different ages and positions, Pete is 31 year old, so giving him 4+ years might not be something you want to do.
Kyle tucker is 28 years old, though turns 29 in jan, still a few years younger, would be more comfortable giving hima longer term pact.
PushDaRock wrote:Cyrus wrote:PushDaRock wrote:
Why wouldn't they have just gotten desperate and "overpaid" for Alonso if they were going to do that?
They didn't want to go more than 3 years for Alonso but will back up the truck for Tucker? Doesn't make too much sense.
Different ages and positions, Pete is 31 year old, so giving him 4+ years might not be something you want to do.
Kyle tucker is 28 years old, though turns 29 in jan, still a few years younger, would be more comfortable giving hima longer term pact.
I'm just saying how does them being more disciplined on Alonso equate to them going insane over Tucker?

Cyrus wrote:I wonder if Mets get desperate and go after Tucker in which they have an openning after trading Nimmo.

Cyrus wrote:Blue Jays: RHP Spencer Miles (Giants) - Here is our Closer we've been looking for.
Just drafted him in rule 5. One of the reasons they opened a spot on the 40 man.
Cyrus wrote:Blue Jays: RHP Spencer Miles (Giants) - Here is our Closer we've been looking for.
Just drafted him in rule 5. One of the reasons they opened a spot on the 40 man.


ORLANDO -- Major League clubs gathered on the last full day of the Winter Meetings to take part in the Rule 5 Draft. The annual event gives clubs an opportunity to add low-risk, high-ceiling talent to their organizations, providing players with the chance to reach the big leagues and remain on a Major League roster for the entire upcoming season.
Below are this year's Rule 5 Draft results, in the reverse order of last season's standings, unlike the amateur Draft (Rule 4), the order of which is now determined in part by a lottery. A team must have room on its 40-man roster to make a pick. Clubs pay $100,000 to select a player in the Major League phase of the Rule 5 Draft, but if that player doesn't stay on the active Major League roster for the full season, he must be offered back to his former team for $50,000.
Players who turned pro at age 18 or younger in 2021 or at age 19 or older in 2022 are eligible for selection in the Major League phase of the Rule 5 Draft if he isn't on a 40-man roster.
There is also a Minor League phase of the Rule 5 Draft, with the costs rising from $12,000 to $24,000 for a Triple-A pick (anyone not protected on a big league or Triple-A roster is eligible). The Double-A phase has been eliminated. Players selected in this portion of the Rule 5 Draft aren't subject to any roster restrictions with their new organizations.
LoveMyRaps wrote:PushDaRock wrote:Cyrus wrote:
Different ages and positions, Pete is 31 year old, so giving him 4+ years might not be something you want to do.
Kyle tucker is 28 years old, though turns 29 in jan, still a few years younger, would be more comfortable giving hima longer term pact.
I'm just saying how does them being more disciplined on Alonso equate to them going insane over Tucker?
They've lost Diaz and now Pete, something they likely didn't anticipate.
So much heat on the front office right now to get something done and right their wrongs. A lot of pushback from fans and ownership will likely result in them overpaying for Tucker.
Duffman100 wrote:Wow interesting rule 5 selection...