Parataxis wrote:JN wrote:PushDaRock wrote:
Yeah, I don't think the penny pinching here is a great argument even if that likely factored into their decision. I think they just gave up on him more than anything else and they don't think he will make it back to the Majors.
I dont really see it as penny pinching. The team, whatever the number, has a budget. So it saves 1.8-2.5 million that it might use elsewhere.
I just thought the risk/reward value was still there at a cost of 2.5 million with a healthy off-season.
It doesn't though. It saves them about 40k.
Keeping him on the 40 man now doesn't mean they need to tender him a contract in the offseason. That was a separate decision that they could make in the future (or agree to terms at a lower number if desired).
There are two different things to discuss. The now and arbitration decision.
I addressed the now part above. I noted (which appears to be in agreement with your take) that they should have kept him on the roster for the remainder of the year and waived Easton Lucas. Not make the move a distraction in any way and then decide later.