Page 1 of 1
Is Marcum a true #1 or #1 by declaration?
Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 2:34 pm
by YogiStewart
Would Marcum be a true #1 starter on most teams?
Also wondering if he's that good of a pitcher or, due to his year off, teams don't have a "book" on him yet and haven't seen much of him.
A few years ago, people were saying he would be a better version of Josh Towers. That certainly isn't great praise.
Just wondering what your thoughts would be.
Re: Is Marcum a true #1 or #1 by declaration?
Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 5:46 pm
by CapeCrusader
#2 easily on most teams, but #1 I dunno.
Re: Is Marcum a true #1 or #1 by declaration?
Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 5:58 pm
by soulchild_07
I think stuff wise he's closer to a #3 but with his make up and including his intangibles make him a front of the rotation starter. However I think on a world series contender, Marcum should be at best your #2 or #3. So I guess my answer to your question is on this team he is a #1 by declaration and you hope someone like Romero or Cecil or Morrow can take over the true #1 role.
Re: Is Marcum a true #1 or #1 by declaration?
Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 6:22 pm
by Lateral Quicks
As I posted in the last game series thread, I think he's a legitimate number 2 at the moment. He had a dominant season before his injury, and he hasn't missed a beat this year.
We need to see him in some more important games vs. the Yankees, Red Sox and Rays to anoint him a true number 1, but his numbers certainly back it up to this point.
Re: Is Marcum a true #1 or #1 by declaration?
Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 6:53 pm
by Brew666
Being that he hadn't pitched since '08 I would say that it was by declaration. At the same token I do believe he is a legit #1. In Toronto we've been spoiled with Cy Young contenders for a very long time so maybe our bar is bit higher.
I do agree with soulchild_07 that he's not going to be a #1 for a World Series contender but most teams aren't World Series contenders.
Re: Is Marcum a true #1 or #1 by declaration?
Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 7:28 pm
by sule
I still just can't wrap my head around the fact that our #1 isn't always going to be as good as Halladay or at least be a Halladay-esque pitcher.
We've consistently had awesome #1's for a long time. Halladay, Clemens, Hentgen (for his Cy years), Steib, David Wells, Jack Morris, hell..even to a lesser extent, Todd Stottlemyer, Juan Guzman, and Doyle Alexander
Re: Is Marcum a true #1 or #1 by declaration?
Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 8:31 pm
by The_Hater
People keep underrating him. Probably because he doesn't throw 95 mph.
Based on how he's pitched during his career thus far, he's at worst a #2 starter. If he's your #3 then you have one hell of a pitching staff and he could easily be the #1 guy on a lot of staffs.