Page 1 of 2
If Brett Lawrie fails = the implications?
Posted: Fri Aug 5, 2011 7:29 pm
by number15
well he is likely the most hyped up Blue Jays prospect to come up with the team in many years.... everyone has pegged him as the long term corner stone type to play 3B for a while. Also it would be the best possible thing for the JAYS to have a Canadian player reach the status of a superstar in Canada.
but what if he fails.... not a total bust, but what if he is not the corner stone we all invision? Travis Snider was once a top prospect in all of baseball and very hyped up also, and today his future is in doubt............. but how much would a fail be Lawrie effect the Jays
im not taking about his debut, or even this season... i mean long term as a JAY
Im hoping he succeeds.... looks like a blue chip prospect. maybe the franchise not too long from now
but just a question... what if he fails?
or is that not an option

Re: If Brett Lawrie fails = the implications?
Posted: Fri Aug 5, 2011 7:36 pm
by Randle McMurphy
The world will end. Or the team will move on with its other players as it always has whenever a prospect has busted.
I'm not sure which is more likely.
Re: If Brett Lawrie fails = the implications?
Posted: Fri Aug 5, 2011 7:37 pm
by -MetA4-
Our farm system is ridiculous, so there aren't many implications if he fails. It would suck, but its not like this is our one franchise hope.
Re: If Brett Lawrie fails = the implications?
Posted: Fri Aug 5, 2011 7:39 pm
by satyr9
I don't see him as a franchise player to begin with. If he can be a core above-average 5/6 type in the lineup with average defense at 3rd or even moving into OF a couple years down the road I'll say he achieved all his potential.
And if he totally flops I don't see it being a major disruption to the franchise. It won't bode well for 2012/2013 competing, but he's still just a guy.
Re: If Brett Lawrie fails = the implications?
Posted: Fri Aug 5, 2011 7:43 pm
by CanadaB-Ball
satyr9 wrote:I don't see him as a franchise player to begin with. If he can be a core above-average 5/6 type in the lineup with average defense at 3rd or even moving into OF a couple years down the road I'll say he achieved all his potential.
And if he totally flops I don't see it being a major disruption to the franchise. It won't bode well for 2012/2013 competing, but he's still just a guy.
Then you'd be lying.
It's one thing to expect that, it's another to call it his absolute ceiling.
Now, I'm not saying that I expect him to reach it, but rather that his ceiling is huge.
Re: If Brett Lawrie fails = the implications?
Posted: Fri Aug 5, 2011 7:45 pm
by Strav
given the huge fan of Snider that you are, it figures that you would ask this. Ask yourself what we gave up for him, and you'll have your answer. It only goes that far imo.
Re: If Brett Lawrie fails = the implications?
Posted: Fri Aug 5, 2011 7:46 pm
by SharoneWright
If he fails, I'm gonna call him "Laurie".
Re: If Brett Lawrie fails = the implications?
Posted: Fri Aug 5, 2011 7:47 pm
by satyr9
CanadaB-Ball wrote:satyr9 wrote:I don't see him as a franchise player to begin with. If he can be a core above-average 5/6 type in the lineup with average defense at 3rd or even moving into OF a couple years down the road I'll say he achieved all his potential.
And if he totally flops I don't see it being a major disruption to the franchise. It won't bode well for 2012/2013 competing, but he's still just a guy.
Then you'd be lying.
It's one thing to expect that, it's another to call it his absolute ceiling.
Now, I'm not saying that I expect him to reach it, but rather that his ceiling is huge.
Okay, absolute maximum ceiling is higher than I listed, but you could say that about almost any B+ or better prospect ever (like Jose Bautista for instance), but he's not an Arod/Griffey type prospect and never was. I've never seen the draftniks and scouts talk about him as more than a 25/30HR type and I'm not even sure where the extra hype is coming from other than the Canadian angle.
Re: If Brett Lawrie fails = the implications?
Posted: Fri Aug 5, 2011 7:51 pm
by Randle McMurphy
If his ceiling is that of Ryan Braun with the bat (and the ability to stay at 3rd base), that would be quite the player.
Re: If Brett Lawrie fails = the implications?
Posted: Fri Aug 5, 2011 7:55 pm
by CanadaB-Ball
satyr9 wrote:CanadaB-Ball wrote:satyr9 wrote:I don't see him as a franchise player to begin with. If he can be a core above-average 5/6 type in the lineup with average defense at 3rd or even moving into OF a couple years down the road I'll say he achieved all his potential.
And if he totally flops I don't see it being a major disruption to the franchise. It won't bode well for 2012/2013 competing, but he's still just a guy.
Then you'd be lying.
It's one thing to expect that, it's another to call it his absolute ceiling.
Now, I'm not saying that I expect him to reach it, but rather that his ceiling is huge.
Okay, absolute maximum ceiling is higher than I listed, but you could say that about almost any B+ or better prospect ever (like Jose Bautista for instance), but he's not an Arod/Griffey type prospect and never was. I've never seen the draftniks and scouts talk about him as more than a 25/30HR type and I'm not even sure where the extra hype is coming from other than the Canadian angle.
Well, after John Sickels scouted him earlier this year, he called him a definite A prospect. So, he's not "just" a B+ prospect.
Nonetheless, I understand (and agree with) the point. All I was saying is that Lawrie absolute ceiling was higher than you previously proclaimed it to be.
Re: If Brett Lawrie fails = the implications?
Posted: Fri Aug 5, 2011 7:56 pm
by -MetA4-
satyr9 wrote:but he's not an Arod/Griffey type prospect and never was.
Is this a serious comment? You mean to tell me that he's not a GOAT caliber prospect? Is that what your definition of a "franchise player" is? A Ken Griffey Jr? LMAO.
Re: If Brett Lawrie fails = the implications?
Posted: Fri Aug 5, 2011 8:14 pm
by ahollz
Why put the cart before the horse? This is turning in to the Raptors board more and more everyday. That's NOT a good thing.
Re: If Brett Lawrie fails = the implications?
Posted: Fri Aug 5, 2011 8:23 pm
by tecumseh18
Mike Schmidt or bust.
Re: If Brett Lawrie fails = the implications?
Posted: Fri Aug 5, 2011 8:30 pm
by MGD24
ahollz wrote:This is turning in to the Raptors board more and more everyday. That's NOT a good thing.
+1
Re: If Brett Lawrie fails = the implications?
Posted: Fri Aug 5, 2011 8:47 pm
by Schad
satyr9 wrote:Okay, absolute maximum ceiling is higher than I listed, but you could say that about almost any B+ or better prospect ever (like Jose Bautista for instance), but he's not an Arod/Griffey type prospect and never was. I've never seen the draftniks and scouts talk about him as more than a 25/30HR type and I'm not even sure where the extra hype is coming from other than the Canadian angle.
John Sickels, as reputable an independent voice as any, called him a superstar-in-waiting earlier in the year, and
reiterated yesterday that he believes that he'll be an offensive star.
Re: If Brett Lawrie fails = the implications?
Posted: Fri Aug 5, 2011 9:28 pm
by Avenger
Lawrie's numbers run through Minor League Equivalency calculator
282/326/505/831
I'd be extremely happy with that line for a couple of years until he fully matures. That's basically Ryan Zimmerman without the elite defence, even if those numbers numbers are his ceiling you gotta be pretty satisfied.
Re: If Brett Lawrie fails = the implications?
Posted: Fri Aug 5, 2011 9:48 pm
by Relentless88
Avenger wrote:Lawrie's numbers run through Minor League Equivalency calculator
282/326/505/831
I'd be extremely happy with that line for a couple of years until he fully matures. That's basically Ryan Zimmerman without the elite defence, even if those numbers numbers are his ceiling you gotta be pretty satisfied.
I'm not sure if I'd be satisfied with that as his ceiling. Those are pretty good numbers, but it's still kind of average at 3rd base.
We need .900 + OPS from at least one of the infield corners. Boston has Youkilis/Gonzalez and New York has A-Rod/Teixeira. They all have career .900 OPS+ I think.
Anyways, I'm not expecting Lawrie to come in and be a star right away, but hopefully he gets there eventually.
Re: If Brett Lawrie fails = the implications?
Posted: Fri Aug 5, 2011 10:57 pm
by DonYon
If he fails we've still got Kevin Ahrens
too lazy to green font
then again, Ahrens is still pretty young
Re: If Brett Lawrie fails = the implications?
Posted: Sat Aug 6, 2011 12:26 am
by vaff87
Either the franchise folds, or we have an apocalypse. Depends on the degree of "bust" he is.
Re: If Brett Lawrie fails = the implications?
Posted: Sat Aug 6, 2011 2:58 am
by rarefind
david wright would be cool.