ImageImageImageImageImage

Does Rauch have 'compromising' pictures of Farrell?

Moderator: JaysRule15

User avatar
Kid Vicious
Analyst
Posts: 3,740
And1: 478
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Location: West Coast

Does Rauch have 'compromising' pictures of Farrell? 

Post#1 » by Kid Vicious » Sat Aug 6, 2011 8:29 am

I was literally in shock when I saw Rauch's less than stellar physique being trotted out again for the save opportunity tonight. After the debacle in Tampa where this turd blew two saves in two consecutive innings, I thought: 'Well, at least that's the end of Rauch!!'.

So what gives exactly? This guy is probably the worst pitcher in the Major Leagues who gets consistent work. Does he even have a good pitch? He is below average in every measurable and conceivable way. How the hell does he keep getting the ball in the 9th inning? The closer's role is supposed to be a coveted role for any team, especially a decent team like the Blue Jays, and this turd keeps getting the ball!!!

Are there really no better options? No one in AAA or AA???? Why didn't we keep Frasor somehow and use him to close?

It's seriously starting to piss me off how the Blue Jays continually reward failure...no wonder we haven't made the playoffs in 20 years.
User avatar
cp007
Junior
Posts: 334
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 19, 2010

Re: Does Rauch have 'compromising' pictures of Farrell? 

Post#2 » by cp007 » Sat Aug 6, 2011 12:58 pm

Kid Vicious wrote:I was literally in shock when I saw Rauch's less than stellar physique being trotted out again for the save opportunity tonight. After the debacle in Tampa where this turd blew two saves in two consecutive innings, I thought: 'Well, at least that's the end of Rauch!!'.

So what gives exactly? This guy is probably the worst pitcher in the Major Leagues who gets consistent work. Does he even have a good pitch? He is below average in every measurable and conceivable way. How the hell does he keep getting the ball in the 9th inning? The closer's role is supposed to be a coveted role for any team, especially a decent team like the Blue Jays, and this turd keeps getting the ball!!!

Are there really no better options? No one in AAA or AA???? Why didn't we keep Frasor somehow and use him to close?

It's seriously starting to piss me off how the Blue Jays continually reward failure...no wonder we haven't made the playoffs in 20 years.


I may be of.base here but I think it has to do with treating vets with certain respect. They gave Rivera his burn through his troubles. Same with Patterson, JoJo, EE. Basically every vet has been backed by management. It might be about creating a good stable club house so in the future guys want to play for the Jays. They have also giver rooks their fair share of PT, Cooper and Snider withstanding. In Snider's case there may be things we are not privy to so I want to back AA on that move, but we shall see.
User avatar
Scorpion King
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,757
And1: 666
Joined: Dec 20, 2008
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Does Rauch have 'compromising' pictures of Farrell? 

Post#3 » by Scorpion King » Sat Aug 6, 2011 1:32 pm

Is he on the waiver wire. I hope some team claims him.

Napoli for Francisco trade is looking terrible and terrible everyday

I guess this is what you get when you reach for the bottom of the barrel. I want both Rauch and Francisco gone by next year. This season blue jays are going to miss playoffs like usual might well give young kids a chance
flatjacket1
Analyst
Posts: 3,237
And1: 66
Joined: Oct 27, 2009

Re: Does Rauch have 'compromising' pictures of Farrell? 

Post#4 » by flatjacket1 » Sat Aug 6, 2011 3:10 pm

Scorpion King wrote:Is he on the waiver wire. I hope some team claims him.

Napoli for Francisco trade is looking terrible and terrible everyday

I guess this is what you get when you reach for the bottom of the barrel. I want both Rauch and Francisco gone by next year. This season blue jays are going to miss playoffs like usual might well give young kids a chance


I don't see whats wrong with Francisco. Hes been unlucky with the long ball, and the only real problem for him has been walks. Other than that his numbers are pretty on pace for last year. A bad inning for a reliever will constantly make his stats look bad, but thats just because a 3 run homerun takes 20 innings of shutout baseball to look decent.

I hope we make him the closer for this year.
Avp115 wrote:Bautista>>Mike Trout and Kendrick
User avatar
Relentless88
RealGM
Posts: 11,794
And1: 101
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
       

Re: Does Rauch have 'compromising' pictures of Farrell? 

Post#5 » by Relentless88 » Sat Aug 6, 2011 3:29 pm

Francisco has been good lately. Give him the closer's job. Rauch should only come out when we have a 5 run lead.
User avatar
JoeyBats
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,254
And1: 407
Joined: Jul 07, 2011

Re: Does Rauch have 'compromising' pictures of Farrell? 

Post#6 » by JoeyBats » Sat Aug 6, 2011 3:58 pm

Relentless88 wrote:Francisco has been good lately. Give him the closer's job. Rauch should only come out when we have a 5 run lead.


I think Franky makes an excellent setup man, less pressure.
User avatar
Santoki
General Manager
Posts: 7,813
And1: 2,635
Joined: Feb 16, 2007
Location: Toronto
   

Re: Does Rauch have 'compromising' pictures of Farrell? 

Post#7 » by Santoki » Sat Aug 6, 2011 3:58 pm

Are you kidding me? Francisco for closer? I guess that's how bad this bullpen has been this year that we're even contemplating that again.
User avatar
Trilogy
RealGM
Posts: 16,650
And1: 3,589
Joined: Oct 13, 2005

Re: Does Rauch have 'compromising' pictures of Farrell? 

Post#8 » by Trilogy » Sat Aug 6, 2011 5:42 pm

FF has been good of late as the 8th inning guy, keep him there.

Make Janssen the closer.
DonYon
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,696
And1: 330
Joined: Jun 25, 2009
         

Re: Does Rauch have 'compromising' pictures of Farrell? 

Post#9 » by DonYon » Sat Aug 6, 2011 7:23 pm

maybe he could close out game for the raptors?

In all seriousness, Rauch is a solid reliever with a solid track record. He shouldn't be judged on his inflated era from some terrible outings, but I'd agree that he hasn't exactly earned the closer role either.
User avatar
Homer Jay
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,494
And1: 674
Joined: Nov 30, 2003

Re: Does Rauch have 'compromising' pictures of Farrell? 

Post#10 » by Homer Jay » Sat Aug 6, 2011 7:42 pm

I just think we need a good sinker ball pitcher to close out games. Rogers' isn't friendly to flyball pitchers and since most closers lately like to throw it hard and high looking for SOs, its not a good mix. Who were our best closers? Henke and Ward. Why? Cause they loved split finger stuff and they got the ground outs.
Image
princeha0
Ballboy
Posts: 7
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 01, 2011

Re: Does Rauch have 'compromising' pictures of Farrell? 

Post#11 » by princeha0 » Sat Aug 6, 2011 8:39 pm

my theory is that BJ's closer role is cursed.

See Francisco has a sub 1.00 ERA in his last 10 games with 10 K too.
User avatar
Kurtz
RealGM
Posts: 15,568
And1: 16,489
Joined: Aug 07, 2002
Location: Toronto

Re: Does Rauch have 'compromising' pictures of Farrell? 

Post#12 » by Kurtz » Sat Aug 6, 2011 8:59 pm

I'd like to hear from Schad on this.
Image
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 38,403
And1: 21,290
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Does Rauch have 'compromising' pictures of Farrell? 

Post#13 » by Randle McMurphy » Sat Aug 6, 2011 9:37 pm

It might have something to do with maintaining Jon Rauch's Type B status. Or John Farrell could just be a moron.

Wouldn't be surprised either way.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
suntzuballin
Head Coach
Posts: 6,807
And1: 2,770
Joined: Feb 07, 2011
   

Re: Does Rauch have 'compromising' pictures of Farrell? 

Post#14 » by suntzuballin » Sat Aug 6, 2011 10:03 pm

I know he would cost alot of money to take on what about Sorino from the Yankees who just put him on waivers
WpgPage
Rookie
Posts: 1,145
And1: 1
Joined: Mar 16, 2010

Re: Does Rauch have 'compromising' pictures of Farrell? 

Post#15 » by WpgPage » Sat Aug 6, 2011 10:27 pm

Soriano is not on real waivers, hes also making way to much money to even think he could be worth it. Rauch has slugged because he is a FB pitcher with a habit of giving up home runs, which doesn't mix in the home run happy AL east. He could be very good pitching in a different division like the AL central or the NL west, but in the AL east hes best suited to medium leverage situations. Hes not the worst option we have right now so I'm fine with him closing out games who cares how many we win this year anyway its not like we are ready to compete yet.
User avatar
Avp115
Junior
Posts: 373
And1: 25
Joined: Jul 12, 2011

Re: Does Rauch have 'compromising' pictures of Farrell? 

Post#16 » by Avp115 » Sat Aug 6, 2011 10:45 pm

Homer Jay wrote:I just think we need a good sinker ball pitcher to close out games. Rogers' isn't friendly to flyball pitchers and since most closers lately like to throw it hard and high looking for SOs, its not a good mix. Who were our best closers? Henke and Ward. Why? Cause they loved split finger stuff and they got the ground outs.

Alvarez?
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 38,403
And1: 21,290
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Does Rauch have 'compromising' pictures of Farrell? 

Post#17 » by Randle McMurphy » Sat Aug 6, 2011 11:59 pm

http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?p ... 2011&ind=0

Rauch is tied for 2nd last among relievers in MLB with -0.5 WAR. But he's got the almighty closer tag.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
User avatar
aselvana
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,352
And1: 886
Joined: Jul 13, 2007
Location: the cold

Re: Does Rauch have 'compromising' pictures of Farrell? 

Post#18 » by aselvana » Tue Aug 9, 2011 2:56 pm

WpgPage wrote:Soriano is not on real waivers, hes also making way to much money to even think he could be worth it. Rauch has slugged because he is a FB pitcher with a habit of giving up home runs, which doesn't mix in the home run happy AL east. He could be very good pitching in a different division like the AL central or the NL west, but in the AL east hes best suited to medium leverage situations. Hes not the worst option we have right now so I'm fine with him closing out games who cares how many we win this year anyway its not like we are ready to compete yet.


also struggled because he has knee problems.
How would you describe Raptors RGM forum in one sentence?
Steelo Green wrote:The one title shouldn’t excuse what was mediocrity all around it.
Michael Bradley
General Manager
Posts: 9,444
And1: 2,142
Joined: Feb 25, 2004

Re: Does Rauch have 'compromising' pictures of Farrell? 

Post#19 » by Michael Bradley » Tue Aug 9, 2011 5:06 pm

Rauch has never been a strike out pitcher and his career HR/9 is 1.0. A homer happy reliever who puts the ball in play is not a true late inning option. Other than the team being afraid to tell him that he can't close, I don't know why he is still in that role.
User avatar
Kid Vicious
Analyst
Posts: 3,740
And1: 478
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Location: West Coast

Re: Does Rauch have 'compromising' pictures of Farrell? 

Post#20 » by Kid Vicious » Tue Aug 16, 2011 11:12 am

I seriously rest my case.

This Jays can have all the blue chip prospects it wants...as long they have guys like Rauch in the game when it matters most, this team will never go anywhere.

Return to Toronto Blue Jays