Page 1 of 1
What not Deck or Jenkins?
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 8:11 pm
by number15
with all the injuries to pitcher the JAYS have resorted to giving shots with no bodies.... why not bring in 2 of our older and better prospects in instead.
Deck McGuire and Chad Jenkins
Re: What not Deck or Jenkins?
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 8:18 pm
by Holmes
The answer is quite simple. They aren't MLB pitchers. They have been disastrous this year at Double A.
Re: What not Deck or Jenkins?
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 8:20 pm
by Schad
Because they are older, but not better. Deck has posted an ERA of 6.62 in double-A, while Jenkins has lost the plot and turned from a mediocre-but-manageable groundball artist into a Deckian launching pad.
Re: What not Deck or Jenkins?
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 8:42 pm
by Holmes
Sad part about Deck, is not Chris Sale, but the fact that he was already a well known low-upside 1st round pick to begin with at the 2010 draft. So seeing him struggle so mightly in double A is so defeating.
Re: What not Deck or Jenkins?
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:00 pm
by Schad
Holmes wrote:Sad part about Deck, is not Chris Sale, but the fact that he was already a well known low-upside 1st round pick to begin with at the 2010 draft. So seeing him struggle so mightly in double A is so defeating.
He wasn't universally considered a low-upside pick...not beyond this board, at least. Law liked him, and John Sickels believed that he'd be a good mid-rotation guy at least. A good #3 starter isn't actually low upside for any pick beyond the top five, so it wasn't a failure
if he could become that. Unfortunately, the straightness of his fastball -- and the declining velocity thereof -- demonstrated why there ain't no such thing as a safe pitching prospect.
Re: What not Deck or Jenkins?
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:01 pm
by Al_Oliver
Schadenfreude wrote:Holmes wrote:Sad part about Deck, is not Chris Sale, but the fact that he was already a well known low-upside 1st round pick to begin with at the 2010 draft. So seeing him struggle so mightly in double A is so defeating.
He wasn't universally considered a low-upside pick...not beyond this board, at least. Law liked him, and John Sickels believed that he'd be a good mid-rotation guy at least. A good #3 starter isn't actually low upside for any pick beyond the top five, so it wasn't a failure
if he could become that. Unfortunately, the straightness of his fastball -- and the declining velocity thereof -- demonstrated why there ain't no such thing as a safe pitching prospect.
how long before he becomes a reliever or a total bust?
Re: What not Deck or Jenkins?
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:19 pm
by kwamebargnani
number15 wrote:with all the injuries to pitcher the JAYS have resorted to giving shots with no bodies.... why not bring in 2 of our older and better prospects in instead.
Deck McGuire and Chad Jenkins
Have you seen their numbers? They're both write offs at this point.
Re: What not Deck or Jenkins?
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:57 pm
by xAIRNESSx
Too bad our high-celing pitchers are all in A-ball.
