Page 1 of 1
Lawrie moved to DL
Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 3:32 am
by Kapono
He is made out of glass.
Re: Lawrie moved to DL
Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 3:50 am
by Garmfay
Andy LaRoche looks to be coming up to man 3B. Funny how Bautista was traded to make room for "Top Prospect" Andy LaRoche in Pittsburgh, now teammates
Re: Lawrie moved to DL
Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 4:03 am
by Wo1verine
Season's over anyways.

Re: Lawrie moved to DL
Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 5:08 am
by Randle McMurphy
Looks like those wanted Lawrie benched/sent to AAA will get their wish of seeing this team without a capable 3B again. Should be a fun few weeks of terrible range and poor infield throws.
Re: Lawrie moved to DL
Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 2:48 pm
by Lateral Quicks
Randle McMurphy wrote:Looks like those wanted Lawrie benched/sent to AAA will get their wish of seeing this team without a capable 3B again. Should be a fun few weeks of terrible range and poor infield throws.
Indeed, counterbalanced in all likelihood by hitting comfortably above the Mendoza line.
Re: Lawrie moved to DL
Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 2:56 pm
by TorontoRaptures
Randle McMurphy wrote:Looks like those wanted Lawrie benched/sent to AAA will get their wish of seeing this team without a capable 3B again. Should be a fun few weeks of terrible range and poor infield throws.
Their argument was to have him go down to AAA to work on his mechanics so that when he came back up he'd better help the team. No one was saying to send him down to improve the team in the short term.
Re: Lawrie moved to DL
Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 3:39 pm
by Santoki
TorontoRaptures wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:Looks like those wanted Lawrie benched/sent to AAA will get their wish of seeing this team without a capable 3B again. Should be a fun few weeks of terrible range and poor infield throws.
Their argument was to have him go down to AAA to work on his mechanics so that when he came back up he'd better help the team. No one was saying to send him down to improve the team in the short term.
Shhhh, get out of here with your logic!
Re: Lawrie moved to DL
Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 3:55 pm
by Randle McMurphy
Lateral Quicks wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:Looks like those wanted Lawrie benched/sent to AAA will get their wish of seeing this team without a capable 3B again. Should be a fun few weeks of terrible range and poor infield throws.
Indeed, counterbalanced in all likelihood by hitting comfortably above the Mendoza line.
Or more likely, a rise toward his career offensive norms like that of which nearly everyone else on the team has experienced in May while playing elite defense at third. Instead, we've got the no-hit, no-field combo of DeRosa/Izturis to look forward to indefinitely. Should be fun, indeed.
Re: Lawrie moved to DL
Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 3:58 pm
by Randle McMurphy
TorontoRaptures wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:Looks like those wanted Lawrie benched/sent to AAA will get their wish of seeing this team without a capable 3B again. Should be a fun few weeks of terrible range and poor infield throws.
Their argument was to have him go down to AAA to work on his mechanics so that when he came back up he'd better help the team. No one was saying to send him down to improve the team in the short term.
Assuming swing mechanics are actually his problem (and not his hacker approach), why would he be better off working on them away from the eyes of the major league coaching staff? Wouldn't he be better off working directly with the people who know him and his swing best?
Re: Lawrie moved to DL
Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 4:30 pm
by TorontoRaptures
Randle McMurphy wrote:TorontoRaptures wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:Looks like those wanted Lawrie benched/sent to AAA will get their wish of seeing this team without a capable 3B again. Should be a fun few weeks of terrible range and poor infield throws.
Their argument was to have him go down to AAA to work on his mechanics so that when he came back up he'd better help the team. No one was saying to send him down to improve the team in the short term.
Assuming swing mechanics are actually his problem (and not his hacker approach), why would he be better off working on them away from the eyes of the major league coaching staff? Wouldn't he be better off working directly with the people who know him and his swing best?
The argument would be less pressure in AAA in which to try new approaches
Re: Lawrie moved to DL
Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 7:02 pm
by Santoki
I think people tend to forget Lawrie is 22-23 years old and in basically his 2nd major league season. He still has lots of polishing to do and could benefit from some time in AAA just like guys like Edwin and Doc did. If we had any sort of viable replacement for him right now, I'd be all for it.
Re: Lawrie moved to DL
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 3:33 pm
by galacticos2
never was a fan of lawrie. the cockiness and his attitude just turned me off. i was initially excited of having a canadian prospect that we would help, and one day lead this team to the playoffs, but its clear why doug melvin and gord ash gave him away for injury riddled marcum. i hope he turns it around, but if not we need to cut him loose before it gets around the league.