Page 1 of 1
OT: Can Rickey Romero be saved?
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 10:48 pm
by Balki-B
Found this, lock if already mentioned.
The thing that's difficult to assess about Romero's performance is that everyone -- including Romero, apparently -- is suggesting his problems are with his delivery. In four starts with Buffalo, however, he's walked 20 batters in 13.2 innings, suggesting that perhaps his problems have gone beyond mechanics and into Steve Blass territory.
Full article here:
http://m.espn.go.com/general/blogs/blog ... t&id=36515At which point does optimism turn and you realize he's not going to recover?
Re: OT: Can Rickey Romero be saved?
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 12:34 am
by akakalakin
sure I do not think it is physical except the mechanical part - which can be fixed
mechanics and the mental aspect can be fixed Ricky
Re: OT: Can Rickey Romero be saved?
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 2:43 am
by J-Roc
I think we should all assume he's not coming back. If he does it's a bonus.
Sent using the RealGM mobile app.
Re: OT: Can Rickey Romero be saved?
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 1:02 pm
by Indiana Jones
this type of problem is career-ending. i wouldn't count on him returning to form.
Re: OT: Can Rickey Romero be saved?
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 6:06 pm
by Gibby
He can be, but we'll never see a repeat of his 2011 season. At best he can be a 4th/5th guy in your rotation.
Re: OT: Can Rickey Romero be saved?
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 6:22 pm
by Balki-B
The notion of "loosing" one's ability to be accurate while throwing a baseball seems counter intuitive. Does a jump shooter suddenly loose his shot? Maybe the ball stops going in the hoop for a few games, but at some point the law of averages comes into play and he starts making buckets again.
This affliction seems most prominent with pitchers. What is it with pitching that seems to result in a collapse of accuracy?
Re: OT: Can Rickey Romero be saved?
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 6:34 pm
by Santoki
Balki-B wrote:The notion of "loosing" one's ability to be accurate while throwing a baseball seems counter intuitive. Does a jump shooter suddenly loose his shot? Maybe the ball stops going in the hoop for a few games, but at some point the law of averages comes into play and he starts making buckets again.
This affliction seems most prominent with pitchers. What is it with pitching that seems to result in a collapse of accuracy?
The mechanics of throwing a baseball accurately are incomparable to shooting a basketball. It's much closer to the complexity of a golf swing.
Re: OT: Can Rickey Romero be saved?
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 10:11 pm
by torontoaces04
Love the shout out to Steve Blass...that's exactly what Ricky has become.
Ricky, just go to a beach somewhere, collect your paycheque, and enjoy. Your days as a MLB'er are behind you.
Re: OT: Can Rickey Romero be saved?
Posted: Sat Jun 1, 2013 4:40 pm
by Balki-B
Santoki wrote:Balki-B wrote:The notion of "loosing" one's ability to be accurate while throwing a baseball seems counter intuitive. Does a jump shooter suddenly loose his shot? Maybe the ball stops going in the hoop for a few games, but at some point the law of averages comes into play and he starts making buckets again.
This affliction seems most prominent with pitchers. What is it with pitching that seems to result in a collapse of accuracy?
The mechanics of throwing a baseball accurately are incomparable to shooting a basketball. It's much closer to the complexity of a golf swing.
I have to respectfully disagree. Don't see many similarities though my knowledge of kinesiology is very limited.I I would liken the motion a golfer takes more closely to that of a tennis or cricket player. Pitching - Maybe a bowler matches most closely?
Ultimately, all professions require the same extreme discipline and commitment to become elite. What other sport produces such anomolies where an elite talent simply looses his ability so suddenly and unexpectedly?
Re: OT: Can Rickey Romero be saved?
Posted: Sat Jun 1, 2013 4:49 pm
by changes
Scrub no.
Re: OT: Can Rickey Romero be saved?
Posted: Sat Jun 1, 2013 5:11 pm
by Schad
It's comparable in complexity, rather than the actual motion. The release of a basketball is a relatively smooth motion; you jump, and as you jump you bring the ball up, shooting optimally at your highest point, with (as best possible) everything squared to the target. It's also relatively low effort/impact, and the ball is fairly large, and thus relatively easy to control with your shooting arm/guide hand. The only movement that needs to be imparted is consistent backspin. For these reasons, even a bad miss in basketball is generally going to be around a foot from the intended target.
With a baseball, you have a not-completely-round object thanks to the seams, gripped in the fingers, and a complex delivery that involves synchronizing parts that are moving in multiple directions, released at a point well off-center of the body (enough that it's generally out of your field of view). You're also throwing hard enough to be at the physiological limit, which makes mistakes more likely and magnifies their results, and you're doing it while throwing on a downward plane off a hill. Moreover, you don't use the same delivery every time; most starters use both a wind-up and a stretch delivery depending on the situation, and some even have two variants out of the stretch. Then, you have a slightly different motion for all of your pitches, each of which is also held differently and usually require varying pressure/the 'finish' with the wrist, meaning that starting pitchers naturally end up with between 8-12 discrete throwing mechanics, all of which need to be synchronized pretty close to perfection while accelerating a ball to highway speeds.
In terms of complexity, it definitely trumps shooting a basketball.
Re: OT: Can Rickey Romero be saved?
Posted: Sat Jun 1, 2013 10:23 pm
by Santoki
Schadenfreude wrote:It's comparable in complexity, rather than the actual motion. The release of a basketball is a relatively smooth motion; you jump, and as you jump you bring the ball up, shooting optimally at your highest point, with (as best possible) everything squared to the target. It's also relatively low effort/impact, and the ball is fairly large, and thus relatively easy to control with your shooting arm/guide hand. The only movement that needs to be imparted is consistent backspin. For these reasons, even a bad miss in basketball is generally going to be around a foot from the intended target.
With a baseball, you have a not-completely-round object thanks to the seams, gripped in the fingers, and a complex delivery that involves synchronizing parts that are moving in multiple directions, released at a point well off-center of the body (enough that it's generally out of your field of view). You're also throwing hard enough to be at the physiological limit, which makes mistakes more likely and magnifies their results, and you're doing it while throwing on a downward plane off a hill. Moreover, you don't use the same delivery every time; most starters use both a wind-up and a stretch delivery depending on the situation, and some even have two variants out of the stretch. Then, you have a slightly different motion for all of your pitches, each of which is also held differently and usually require varying pressure/the 'finish' with the wrist, meaning that starting pitchers naturally end up with between 8-12 discrete throwing mechanics, all of which need to be synchronized pretty close to perfection while accelerating a ball to highway speeds.
In terms of complexity, it definitely trumps shooting a basketball.
You described it better than I ever could, but that's what I was going for in terms of the similarity of the level of complexity. Also, golf has very many different types of swings and you see golfers "lose" different aspects of their game suddenly all the time. One minute the guy can't hit a drive or putt to save his life for no apparent reason. And, as an individual sport, you don't normally follow a guy who would be the equivalent of a Romero, but these guys gain and then lose their cards never to be heard of again.
Re: OT: Can Rickey Romero be saved?
Posted: Sat Jun 1, 2013 11:45 pm
by dagger
I think he has to undergo a radical change in mental approach and try to regroup next season. He's down 4-0 after two innings in Norfolk, and all runs came with two outs. Granted, he should have been out of the second inning unscathed - poor defence allowed a run-scoring triple, and that batter then comes home on a wild pitch. But he doesn't seem mentally tough enough to finish off an inning.
Edit: Through five, he's hung in there, given up five runs. seven hits, struck out three. Couple of positives. No walks. And after most everything, hit or out, went to the outfield in the first two innings, in his last two he has had mainly infield outs and Ks. Also, only 71 pitches - 47 strikes - through five.
Re: OT: Can Rickey Romero be saved?
Posted: Sat Jun 1, 2013 11:56 pm
by 11x
Ricky Romero off Blue Jays roster, Brandon Morrow on disabled list
The Blue Jays Saturday outrighted Romero, the club’s ace the past three years, off the 40 man roster.
SAN DIEGO—Ricky Romero’s free fall continues, with no tenable end in sight.
The Blue Jays Saturday outrighted Romero, the club’s ace the past three years, off the 40 man roster. It was part of a roster clearing move Saturday that started with another blow to the pitching staff—the placement of right hander Brandon Morrow on the 15 day disabled list with a forearm strain.
That precipitated the club purchasing the contract of veteran right hander Ramon Ortiz, whom they outrighted two days ago after he gave up back to back home runs to Atlanta in Toronto.
http://www.thestar.com/sports/baseball/ ... _list.html
Re: OT: Can Rickey Romero be saved?
Posted: Sun Jun 2, 2013 1:05 am
by dagger
Ricky problems lives to pitch another day in AAA
John Lott @LottOnBaseball 34s
Ricky Romero tonight for Buffalo: 6 IP, 8 H, 5 R earned, 0 BB, 3 K, 3 WP. 83 pitches, 53 strikes. Leaves in 5-5 tie.
Re: OT: Can Rickey Romero be saved?
Posted: Sun Jun 2, 2013 2:10 am
by torontoaces04
dagger wrote:Ricky problems lives to pitch another day in AAA
John Lott @LottOnBaseball 34s
Ricky Romero tonight for Buffalo: 6 IP, 8 H, 5 R earned, 0 BB, 3 K, 3 WP. 83 pitches, 53 strikes. Leaves in 5-5 tie.
Most important number I see there is 0 BB. The fact that he went 6 innings is also good.
(Glass half full)
Re: OT: Can Rickey Romero be saved?
Posted: Mon Jun 3, 2013 2:53 pm
by Balki-B
Schadenfreude wrote:It's comparable in complexity, rather than the actual motion. The release of a basketball is a relatively smooth motion; you jump, and as you jump you bring the ball up, shooting optimally at your highest point, with (as best possible) everything squared to the target. It's also relatively low effort/impact, and the ball is fairly large, and thus relatively easy to control with your shooting arm/guide hand. The only movement that needs to be imparted is consistent backspin. For these reasons, even a bad miss in basketball is generally going to be around a foot from the intended target.
With a baseball, you have a not-completely-round object thanks to the seams, gripped in the fingers, and a complex delivery that involves synchronizing parts that are moving in multiple directions, released at a point well off-center of the body (enough that it's generally out of your field of view). You're also throwing hard enough to be at the physiological limit, which makes mistakes more likely and magnifies their results, and you're doing it while throwing on a downward plane off a hill. Moreover, you don't use the same delivery every time; most starters use both a wind-up and a stretch delivery depending on the situation, and some even have two variants out of the stretch. Then, you have a slightly different motion for all of your pitches, each of which is also held differently and usually require varying pressure/the 'finish' with the wrist, meaning that starting pitchers naturally end up with between 8-12 discrete throwing mechanics, all of which need to be synchronized pretty close to perfection while accelerating a ball to highway speeds.
In terms of complexity, it definitely trumps shooting a basketball.
Touché.