Bautista/Janssen disappointed by Jays' inactivity
Moderator: JaysRule15
Bautista/Janssen disappointed by Jays' inactivity
- Rhettmatic
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 21,081
- And1: 14,547
- Joined: Jul 23, 2006
- Location: Toronto
-
Bautista/Janssen disappointed by Jays' inactivity
[tweet]https://twitter.com/SNBarryDavis/status/494953595935014912[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/SNBarryDavis/status/494954690816131072[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/SNBarryDavis/status/494954690816131072[/tweet]

Sig by the one and only Turbo_Zone.
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
- TR50
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,545
- And1: 1,222
- Joined: Dec 19, 2004
-
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
Not surprised at all. If I were him I'd be pissed.
I feel bad for him, and when he leaves us after his contract expires for a team like the Yankees or something, I won't be surprised or pissed (at him).
I feel bad for him, and when he leaves us after his contract expires for a team like the Yankees or something, I won't be surprised or pissed (at him).
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
-
- 2015 Beat the Commish Champion
- Posts: 17,585
- And1: 11,768
- Joined: Apr 23, 2010
-
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
Good on JoeyBats!
It doesn't look good when the face of the franchise speaks out like this.
It doesn't look good when the face of the franchise speaks out like this.

BrunoSkull
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
- Santoki
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,813
- And1: 2,635
- Joined: Feb 16, 2007
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
If they struggle down the stretch and don't make the playoffs, I can see Bautista quietly requesting a trade. He's always been the one to show disappointment in the lack of activity.
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,093
- And1: 3,626
- Joined: Mar 19, 2008
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
wasn't expecting a massive deal, and pretty glad we still have sanchez, norris, etc. but i'm disappointed we couldn't at least shore up the bullpen
galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.
Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,094
- And1: 211
- Joined: Dec 28, 2002
-
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
Shots fired at AA or at the real culprit Rogers?
That's what she said.
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,055
- And1: 21,165
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
Good. At least somebody publicly has the balls to say something (and this is directed at ownership without question). Everyone already knows about the embarrassing Santana situation.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
- Rhettmatic
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 21,081
- And1: 14,547
- Joined: Jul 23, 2006
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
Bautista saying this increases the pressure on ownership to spend on even a minor deal in August, though I'm not sure by what degree.
They may have soured on AA to the point of tying his hands but surely they don't want a pissed-off star.
They may have soured on AA to the point of tying his hands but surely they don't want a pissed-off star.

Sig by the one and only Turbo_Zone.
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,540
- And1: 2,203
- Joined: Nov 18, 2010
-
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
s e n s i wrote:wasn't expecting a massive deal, and kinda glad we still have sanchez, norris, etc. but i'm disappointed we couldn't at least shore up the bullpen
Yeah that was the only thing I was realistically expecting given our lack of depth of AA/AAA prospects and Sanchez/Stroman being off the table. Andrew Miller was the only good reliever traded and he cost the no.68 prospect in all of baseball heading into 2014.
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 12,346
- And1: 6,644
- Joined: Sep 08, 2010
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
Love Bautista
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
- LittleOzzy
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 35,033
- And1: 4,198
- Joined: Dec 19, 2005
-
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
So happy he said something.
AA finally getting major criticism.
AA finally getting major criticism.
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
- Rhettmatic
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 21,081
- And1: 14,547
- Joined: Jul 23, 2006
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
LittleOzzy wrote:So happy he said something.
AA finally getting major criticism.
It should be on Rogers. This works out almost too well for them if people actually blame AA.

Sig by the one and only Turbo_Zone.
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,055
- And1: 21,165
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
Rhettmatic wrote:LittleOzzy wrote:So happy he said something.
AA finally getting major criticism.
It should be on Rogers. This works out almost too well for them if people actually blame AA.
Yep, they would love the fans to be that oblivious. They're banking on it really.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 12,346
- And1: 6,644
- Joined: Sep 08, 2010
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
I think a lot of fans are giving AA a free pass still... He can always make trades that can benefit
the team without adding salary.
the team without adding salary.
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
- LittleOzzy
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 35,033
- And1: 4,198
- Joined: Dec 19, 2005
-
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
Rhettmatic wrote:LittleOzzy wrote:So happy he said something.
AA finally getting major criticism.
It should be on Rogers. This works out almost too well for them if people actually blame AA.
Of course it should be Rogers, but it never works out that way. Unless of course Bautista had the balls to call out the whole company.
Hard to do though while they pay you millions to hit a small white ball.
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,940
- And1: 11,190
- Joined: Feb 20, 2006
- Location: Big green house
-
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
I expect Janssen to say something, too. It's important to bear in mind that Jays are getting Bau, Edwin and Melky at a discount, relative to performance. That gives them the right to complain if the organization cheaps out on moves. I really can't wait to hear how AA says he couldn't top the Tigers' offer for Price.
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,055
- And1: 21,165
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
Waylon Mercy wrote:I think a lot of fans are giving AA a free pass still... He can always make trades that can benefit
the team without adding salary.
That's what the Valencia trade was. A salary neutral move (which was the only kind he could make).
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
- Chevy Chase
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,979
- And1: 820
- Joined: Jul 26, 2004
- Location: Jane & Finch
-
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
I share his sentiments. I was looking at purchasing a package, but not if we arent going to act like a team who cares. Rogers has deeper pockets than all but a few teams. Any non-spending is a wholly internal decision and has nothing to do with revenue or viability.
Sent from my iPad using RealGM Forums
Sent from my iPad using RealGM Forums
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 12,346
- And1: 6,644
- Joined: Sep 08, 2010
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
Randle McMurphy wrote:Waylon Mercy wrote:I think a lot of fans are giving AA a free pass still... He can always make trades that can benefit
the team without adding salary.
That's what the Valencia trade was. A salary neutral move (which was the only kind he could make).
Ya and I was hoping for another or similar type of deal or hoping for a deal with slightly better caliber
of players. Never expected Lester or Price or anything like that.
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
- Ado05
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,213
- And1: 6,088
- Joined: Aug 22, 2012
-
Re: Bautista disappointed by Jays' inactivity
Of course Blair says it isnt money thats the issue, but more of a lack of prospect depth.