Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
Moderator: JaysRule15
Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
- RapsFanInVA
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,133
- And1: 2,245
- Joined: Jul 10, 2008
- Location: Colorado
-
Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
http://deadspin.com/brett-lawrie-really-sucked-last-night-1696488294?utm_campaign=socialflow_deadspin_twitter&utm_source=deadspin_twitter&utm_medium=socialflow
0-4, 4K's on 12 pitches! That's the holy grail of Golden Sombreros!
0-4, 4K's on 12 pitches! That's the holy grail of Golden Sombreros!
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
- Waylanderz
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,566
- And1: 6,246
- Joined: Jan 04, 2012
- Location: Toronto, Ontario
-
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
I wonder how many of those pitches he swung at...
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
- savierdcglobe
- Sophomore
- Posts: 247
- And1: 120
- Joined: Jan 28, 2010
-
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
This is what Feliz threw at him
1 - Fastball, Slider, Slider
2 - Slider, Slider, Slider
3 - Curve, Curve, Curve
4 - Slider, Slider, Slider
I believe he swung at 60-70% of them, all out of the strike zone.
1 - Fastball, Slider, Slider
2 - Slider, Slider, Slider
3 - Curve, Curve, Curve
4 - Slider, Slider, Slider
I believe he swung at 60-70% of them, all out of the strike zone.
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
- Hendrix
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,030
- And1: 3,662
- Joined: May 30, 2007
- Location: London, Ontario
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
I wonder what % of realgm\rs could do better than that. Foul off a pitch or two, and make it to 13 or 14 pitches, that is.
oak2455 wrote:Do understand English???
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 902
- And1: 475
- Joined: Aug 07, 2004
- Contact:
-
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
better to burn out than fade away? I guess the only thing worse in terms of a competitors mind frame would but striking out looking x 4. A lot of competitive people like myself would argue it's worse to not even give it a go at golfing one and/or not even trying to make the fielding defense get you out by at least swinging at the ball.
in before we won the trade.
in before we won the trade.
"A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives." - Jackie Robinson
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
- Lateral Quicks
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,537
- And1: 16,673
- Joined: Dec 05, 2002
-
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
Ku-Bar wrote:in before we won the trade.
I know you're probably joking, but it's definitely way too early to say that. Graveman made the A's starting rotation, and Nolin will probably get his chance soon enough. Barreto is Barreto. I'm not convinced Lawrie will ever fix his terrible swing mechanics, but even if he doesn't his defense and middling offense add to up to a solid regular.
In all likelihood I think both teams will make out pretty well.
Nick Nurse recounting his first meeting with Kawhi:
“We could have gone forever. (Raptors management) kept knocking on the door and I was like, ‘A couple more minutes.’ Because we were really into it."
“We could have gone forever. (Raptors management) kept knocking on the door and I was like, ‘A couple more minutes.’ Because we were really into it."
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
- Kurtz
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,565
- And1: 16,481
- Joined: Aug 07, 2002
- Location: Toronto
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
Hendrix wrote:I wonder what % of realgm\rs could do better than that. Foul off a pitch or two, and make it to 13 or 14 pitches, that is.
To be honest, I don't think anyone here would. Go to the batting cages, set the speed to 90 mph and see if you can make contact. I know I couldn't.

Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
- BigLeagueChew
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,041
- And1: 4,088
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Location: Catcher
-
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
Kurtz wrote:Hendrix wrote:I wonder what % of realgm\rs could do better than that. Foul off a pitch or two, and make it to 13 or 14 pitches, that is.
To be honest, I don't think anyone here would. Go to the batting cages, set the speed to 90 mph and see if you can make contact. I know I couldn't.
At least %1

Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
- Santoki
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,813
- And1: 2,635
- Joined: Feb 16, 2007
- Location: Toronto
-
Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
Kurtz wrote:Hendrix wrote:I wonder what % of realgm\rs could do better than that. Foul off a pitch or two, and make it to 13 or 14 pitches, that is.
To be honest, I don't think anyone here would. Go to the batting cages, set the speed to 90 mph and see if you can make contact. I know I couldn't.
I hadn't swung a bat in years outside of softball. I went to the cages and set it to 80 and I was whiffing 4/5 pitches. Now imagine adding in movement. We wouldn't even come close to touching a major leaguer's stuff.
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
- Hendrix
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,030
- And1: 3,662
- Joined: May 30, 2007
- Location: London, Ontario
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
Kurtz wrote:Hendrix wrote:I wonder what % of realgm\rs could do better than that. Foul off a pitch or two, and make it to 13 or 14 pitches, that is.
To be honest, I don't think anyone here would. Go to the batting cages, set the speed to 90 mph and see if you can make contact. I know I couldn't.
I dunno if I could. Maybe. I went to the batting cages with some buddies like a year ago. We were trying to do just that. Look for 90mph, to see if we could hit a major league fastball. Fastest ones at the park were only 75mph I think. I was all over 75mph, getting the head out early, and pulling them with good contact liners every time. But, some of my 'average joe' friends that didn't play ball growing up were struggling to make contact, were late, tipping balls off, etc...
But, 15+ extra mph, and throwing breaking balls is a completely different ball game than hitting constant, straight, 75mph pitches.
I think there's a batting cage just outside of London here actually that has one of those pitching machines with a video screen of a pitcher, that can go 100mph+, and throw breaking stuff. Would be interesting to try it out.
oak2455 wrote:Do understand English???
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,050
- And1: 21,163
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
Might be able to make contact with a fastball if I knew it was coming. I mean didn't Will Farrell even foul one off a few weeks back? 11/12 of those pitches were breaking balls, absolutely no shot on those.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
- Parataxis
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,427
- And1: 5,736
- Joined: Jan 31, 2010
- Location: Penticton, BC
-
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
Kurtz wrote:Hendrix wrote:I wonder what % of realgm\rs could do better than that. Foul off a pitch or two, and make it to 13 or 14 pitches, that is.
To be honest, I don't think anyone here would. Go to the batting cages, set the speed to 90 mph and see if you can make contact. I know I couldn't.
At 90mph I probably wouldn't even have time to swing.
Actually, now that I think about it, that might have gotten me a 1-2 count in at least one of those ABs. Winner!
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,093
- And1: 3,626
- Joined: Mar 19, 2008
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
i wouldn't be able to make even the slightest contact with a big league offering but i'm pretty sure i could stand there and take a pitch or two 

galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.
Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,905
- And1: 70,936
- Joined: Oct 22, 2003
-
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
s e n s i wrote:i wouldn't be able to make even the slightest contact with a big league offering but i'm pretty sure i could stand there and take a pitch or two
And look cool doing it, of course.
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
- zong
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,289
- And1: 102
- Joined: Sep 27, 2007
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
Must be the turf.
Oh wait.
Oh wait.
Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 910
- And1: 369
- Joined: May 18, 2014
-
Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
Donaldson is everything Oakland can hope Lawrie will become..... But the odds are against it.
However, they got a nice package of Graveman, Nolin, Barreto.
Win Win trade for sides
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
However, they got a nice package of Graveman, Nolin, Barreto.
Win Win trade for sides
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
- northernpuppy
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,997
- And1: 494
- Joined: Jan 29, 2005
- Location: TOR/WSR/OTT
-
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
I played Junior AAA for Brampton and, although I'm super retired, I could foul off 85 MPH. 90+ with movement? Probs not haha.
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
- LLJ
- RealGM
- Posts: 53,789
- And1: 18,041
- Joined: Jul 10, 2003
- Location: Unfixed
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
Kurtz wrote:Hendrix wrote:I wonder what % of realgm\rs could do better than that. Foul off a pitch or two, and make it to 13 or 14 pitches, that is.
To be honest, I don't think anyone here would. Go to the batting cages, set the speed to 90 mph and see if you can make contact. I know I couldn't.
I could get lucky in a batting cage because it's just a machine spitting it out at the same speed in the same intervals. But against a human pitcher, the odds of touching a pitch would probably be less than 1%
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
- Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,434
- And1: 17,967
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
-
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
LLJ wrote:Kurtz wrote:Hendrix wrote:I wonder what % of realgm\rs could do better than that. Foul off a pitch or two, and make it to 13 or 14 pitches, that is.
To be honest, I don't think anyone here would. Go to the batting cages, set the speed to 90 mph and see if you can make contact. I know I couldn't.
I could get lucky in a batting cage because it's just a machine spitting it out at the same speed in the same intervals. But against a human pitcher, the odds of touching a pitch would probably be less than 1%
Yeah, I'm guessing that few of us could so much as foul tip a 90 mph fastball. I'm certain that none of us could touch an 80 mph changeup after seeing a couple 90 mph fastballs.

**** your asterisk.
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
-
- Junior
- Posts: 267
- And1: 143
- Joined: Nov 28, 2006
Re: Brett Lawrie's Historically Bad Night at the Plate
Two words:
Eric. Hinske.
Parallels:
- dealt between Toronto and Oakland
- wide bodied 3rd baseman
- "on base freak with speed and power"
- such a promising rookie season, SO much hope
- fizzle out within 3 years
Eric. Hinske.
Parallels:
- dealt between Toronto and Oakland
- wide bodied 3rd baseman
- "on base freak with speed and power"
- such a promising rookie season, SO much hope
- fizzle out within 3 years
---- 98-99 Beginning of a Dynasty ----
C - Willis 12/8
PF - Trent 16/8
SF - Carter 18/6
SG - Christie 15/4
PG - Billups 14/4
Bench: Wallace, Camby, Mcgrady, Brown, Williams
C - Willis 12/8
PF - Trent 16/8
SF - Carter 18/6
SG - Christie 15/4
PG - Billups 14/4
Bench: Wallace, Camby, Mcgrady, Brown, Williams