ImageImageImageImageImage

Jays extend Smoak for two years

Moderator: JaysRule15

dagger
RealGM
Posts: 40,525
And1: 13,448
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Jays extend Smoak for two years 

Post#1 » by dagger » Sat Jul 16, 2016 4:28 pm

http://www.thescore.com/mlb/news/1059307
The Toronto Blue Jays have signed first baseman Justin Smoak to a two-year contract extension worth $8.25-million, the team announced Saturday.

The contract also includes a $6-million club option for 2019 that could reach $8-million thanks to escalator clauses based on plate appearances, according to Sportsnet's Shi Davidi.

Smoak was due to become a free agent after this season.

Known more for his glovework at first base than his bat, the switch-hitting Smoak owns a .234/.333/.402 line with nine homers over 82 games this season. In 2015, as part of a first-base platoon with Chris Colabello, he slugged 18 homers to help the Blue Jays reach the postseason for the first time since 1993.

Smoak, drafted 11th overall by the Texas Rangers in 2008, came to the Blue Jays as a waiver claim in October 2014. The 29-year-old owns a career .225/.310/.393 line with 101 home runs in 780 games with the Blue Jays, Rangers, and Seattle Mariners.

2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
User avatar
Lateral Quicks
RealGM
Posts: 20,291
And1: 16,361
Joined: Dec 05, 2002
   

Re: Jays extend Smoak for two years 

Post#2 » by Lateral Quicks » Sat Jul 16, 2016 4:36 pm

Well if Bautista isn't back and playing 1B - assuming he's done as an outfielder - I suppose we'll need someone to man 1B. And the hope would be that Tellez can earn the role in the option year. But still, is Smoak really the best we can do for a stopgap? I've never been a fan of paying this kind of salary to a decidedly mediocre player. He's put up 1.9 WAR in 6+ years, and 0 WAR so far this year.
Nick Nurse recounting his first meeting with Kawhi:
“We could have gone forever. (Raptors management) kept knocking on the door and I was like, ‘A couple more minutes.’ Because we were really into it."
polo007
General Manager
Posts: 8,546
And1: 2,652
Joined: Nov 02, 2006

Re: Jays extend Smoak for two years 

Post#3 » by polo007 » Sat Jul 16, 2016 4:37 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/ShiDavidi/status/754346756385624064[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/ShiDavidi/status/754346907481157632[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/ShiDavidi/status/754348550276784128[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/ShiDavidi/status/754350682119868416[/tweet]
ldnk
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,905
And1: 3,522
Joined: Feb 17, 2007

Re: Jays extend Smoak for two years 

Post#4 » by ldnk » Sat Jul 16, 2016 4:40 pm

Yeah, no thanks. I can see the rush to sign the guy hitting .169 over the last two months though.
User avatar
Santoki
General Manager
Posts: 7,813
And1: 2,635
Joined: Feb 16, 2007
Location: Toronto
   

Re: Jays extend Smoak for two years 

Post#5 » by Santoki » Sat Jul 16, 2016 4:47 pm

I get it but, ugh, Smoak is the worst and his glove is overrated. I was really hoping I never had to watch this guy swing over every single curveball again in my life.
Wo1verine
2015 Beat the Commish Champion
Posts: 17,566
And1: 11,761
Joined: Apr 23, 2010
     

Re: Jays extend Smoak for two years 

Post#6 » by Wo1verine » Sat Jul 16, 2016 5:28 pm

He's cheap so it makes sense for Atkins and Shapiro.
Image
BrunoSkull
EH15
General Manager
Posts: 7,859
And1: 6,934
Joined: Jan 15, 2008

Re: Jays extend Smoak for two years 

Post#7 » by EH15 » Sat Jul 16, 2016 6:08 pm

Isn't his position the easiest to find a replacement in the off season?
User avatar
Raps in 4
RealGM
Posts: 61,638
And1: 54,139
Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Location: Toronto
 

Re: Jays extend Smoak for two years 

Post#8 » by Raps in 4 » Sat Jul 16, 2016 6:22 pm

$4 million/year for a player who can't hit or play anything more than passable defence? I'd love to hear the logic behind the signing.
North_of_Border
Pro Prospect
Posts: 910
And1: 369
Joined: May 18, 2014
   

Re: Jays extend Smoak for two years 

Post#9 » by North_of_Border » Sat Jul 16, 2016 7:07 pm

is Smoak still getting contracts based on Potential?

how old is he?
The_Hater
GHOAT (Greatest Hater Of All Time)
Posts: 85,319
And1: 40,047
Joined: May 23, 2001
     

Re: Jays extend Smoak for two years 

Post#10 » by The_Hater » Sat Jul 16, 2016 7:22 pm

I don't get this at all.

And to whoever called him cheap, paying $4 million a season for a bad offensive 1B isn't cheap, it's reckless. Especially on a team that has a bunch of players who could slide into that position next season.
AthensBucks wrote:Lowry is done.
Nurse is below average at best.
Masai is overrated.
I dont get how so many people believe in the raptors,they have zero to chance to win it all.


April 14th, 2019.
User avatar
Skin Blues
Veteran
Posts: 2,624
And1: 871
Joined: Nov 24, 2010

Re: Jays extend Smoak for two years 

Post#11 » by Skin Blues » Sat Jul 16, 2016 7:37 pm

North_of_Border wrote:is Smoak still getting contracts based on Potential?

how old is he?

He was worth $5M last year despite splitting time with Cola for a bit, and this year he could easily be worth that by the end of the season. It's such a small amount of money, if he's worthy of even platooning at 1B then it's worth it. And of course, yeah, thre's always potential for a guy with that kind of power and plate discipline to put up a huge season. He's not much different than the type of player Adam Lind was the past few years and he was worth a lot more than $4M/year. Low-risk, medium reward.
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 57,353
And1: 17,052
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: Jays extend Smoak for two years 

Post#12 » by Schad » Sat Jul 16, 2016 7:52 pm

While $5m buys you a grand total of not too much by WAR value, I'm still not a fan. We're going to need every cent next year, and barely-replacement-level players should be where we're skimping to do so.
Image
**** your asterisk.
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 33,544
And1: 19,071
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Jays extend Smoak for two years 

Post#13 » by Randle McMurphy » Sat Jul 16, 2016 9:15 pm

Reminds me of the 3 year/9M Izturis signing a few years back. Needless, but not exactly damaging either. It's still hard to grasp why they like the guy so much, though.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
ldnk
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,905
And1: 3,522
Joined: Feb 17, 2007

Re: Jays extend Smoak for two years 

Post#14 » by ldnk » Sat Jul 16, 2016 9:20 pm

Randle McMurphy wrote:Reminds me of the 3 year/9M Izturis signing a few years back. Needless, but not exactly damaging either. It's still hard to grasp why they like the guy so much, though.


He makes me feel better about my own inability to hit the curve ball.
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 33,544
And1: 19,071
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Jays extend Smoak for two years 

Post#15 » by Randle McMurphy » Sat Jul 16, 2016 9:22 pm

ldnk wrote:
Randle McMurphy wrote:Reminds me of the 3 year/9M Izturis signing a few years back. Needless, but not exactly damaging either. It's still hard to grasp why they like the guy so much, though.


He makes me feel better about my own inability to hit the curve ball.

He's a perfectly mediocre 1B option and this cheap contract won't prevent them from upgrading there if they want to. But why the multi-year deal?
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
ldnk
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,905
And1: 3,522
Joined: Feb 17, 2007

Re: Jays extend Smoak for two years 

Post#16 » by ldnk » Sat Jul 16, 2016 9:23 pm

Randle McMurphy wrote:
ldnk wrote:
Randle McMurphy wrote:Reminds me of the 3 year/9M Izturis signing a few years back. Needless, but not exactly damaging either. It's still hard to grasp why they like the guy so much, though.


He makes me feel better about my own inability to hit the curve ball.

He's a perfectly mediocre 1B option and this cheap contract won't prevent them from upgrading there if they want to. But why the multi-year deal?


I can easily be proven wrong but I have a feeling we are slashing payroll.
User avatar
Kurtz
RealGM
Posts: 15,015
And1: 15,639
Joined: Aug 07, 2002
Location: Toronto

Re: Jays extend Smoak for two years 

Post#17 » by Kurtz » Sat Jul 16, 2016 9:39 pm

Randle McMurphy wrote:
ldnk wrote:
Randle McMurphy wrote:Reminds me of the 3 year/9M Izturis signing a few years back. Needless, but not exactly damaging either. It's still hard to grasp why they like the guy so much, though.


He makes me feel better about my own inability to hit the curve ball.

He's a perfectly mediocre 1B option and this cheap contract won't prevent them from upgrading there if they want to. But why the multi-year deal?


How many regular 1B can you think of who are worse than Smoak?
Image
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 33,544
And1: 19,071
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Jays extend Smoak for two years 

Post#18 » by Randle McMurphy » Sat Jul 16, 2016 9:54 pm

Kurtz wrote:
Randle McMurphy wrote:
ldnk wrote:
He makes me feel better about my own inability to hit the curve ball.

He's a perfectly mediocre 1B option and this cheap contract won't prevent them from upgrading there if they want to. But why the multi-year deal?


How many regular 1B can you think of who are worse than Smoak?

Off the top of my head, Logan Morrison. But there are several others.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 33,544
And1: 19,071
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Jays extend Smoak for two years 

Post#19 » by Randle McMurphy » Sat Jul 16, 2016 9:55 pm

ldnk wrote:
Randle McMurphy wrote:
ldnk wrote:
He makes me feel better about my own inability to hit the curve ball.

He's a perfectly mediocre 1B option and this cheap contract won't prevent them from upgrading there if they want to. But why the multi-year deal?


I can easily be proven wrong but I have a feeling we are slashing payroll.

Giving needless multi-year deals out wouldn't support a slashing payroll hypothesis.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
RalphWiggum
RealGM
Posts: 12,916
And1: 8,222
Joined: Jul 11, 2001
Location: PARTS UNKNOWN
   

Re: Re: Jays extend Smoak for two years 

Post#20 » by RalphWiggum » Sat Jul 16, 2016 10:02 pm

Randle McMurphy wrote:Reminds me of the 3 year/9M Izturis signing a few years back. Needless, but not exactly damaging either. It's still hard to grasp why they like the guy so much, though.

It may be damaging when the Jays hold hard on 18 million for Edwin instead of the 22 his agent wants and we get spoon fed crap that they were at the top of their budget and couldn't afford him.

Return to Toronto Blue Jays