ImageImageImageImageImage

Jays like Andrew McCutchen

Moderator: JaysRule15

North_of_Border
Pro Prospect
Posts: 910
And1: 369
Joined: May 18, 2014
   

Jays like Andrew McCutchen 

Post#1 » by North_of_Border » Sun Dec 25, 2016 2:22 am

The Blue Jays are seeking outfield help and are open to trading for Pirates outfielder Andrew McCutchen, according to ESPN’s Jerry Crasnick.

----------------------------

So the Jays won't resign EE at a bargain price, only to save a comp draft pick. Yet they will further diminish their weak farm by trading a huge package for McCutchen, who is a FA after the season.

Does any of this make sense to you?

Cause I'm perplexed at the logic.
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,419
And1: 17,946
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: Jays like Andrew McCutchen 

Post#2 » by Schad » Sun Dec 25, 2016 3:40 am

North_of_Border wrote:The Blue Jays are seeking outfield help and are open to trading for Pirates outfielder Andrew McCutchen, according to ESPN’s Jerry Crasnick.

----------------------------

So the Jays won't resign EE at a bargain price, only to save a comp draft pick. Yet they will further diminish their weak farm by trading a huge package for McCutchen, who is a FA after the season.

Does any of this make sense to you?

Cause I'm perplexed at the logic.


It's hopefully more tire-kicking than anything. However, McCutchen isn't a free agent after this season: he has a $14.5m option for 2018 which will be picked up in all but extraordinary circumstances.
Image
**** your asterisk.
North_of_Border
Pro Prospect
Posts: 910
And1: 369
Joined: May 18, 2014
   

Re: RE: Re: Jays like Andrew McCutchen 

Post#3 » by North_of_Border » Sun Dec 25, 2016 3:54 am

Schad wrote:
North_of_Border wrote:The Blue Jays are seeking outfield help and are open to trading for Pirates outfielder Andrew McCutchen, according to ESPN’s Jerry Crasnick.

----------------------------

So the Jays won't resign EE at a bargain price, only to save a comp draft pick. Yet they will further diminish their weak farm by trading a huge package for McCutchen, who is a FA after the season.

Does any of this make sense to you?

Cause I'm perplexed at the logic.


It's hopefully more tire-kicking than anything. However, McCutchen isn't a free agent after this season: he has a $14.5m option for 2018 which will be picked up in all but extraordinary circumstances.

True. He us not a FA after season.

However if the goal of letting EE go was to replenish the farm. Even if it's for 1 comp pick. This he very odd trade to even kick the tires on. Just look at what the Pirates demanded from Washington. Even Gioloto plus more was not enough. Doubt we would even have the pieces if serious.

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using RealGM mobile app
spykelee
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,038
And1: 2,906
Joined: Sep 14, 2005
Location: Toronto
   

Re: Jays like Andrew McCutchen 

Post#4 » by spykelee » Sun Dec 25, 2016 5:31 am

It would have to be from our roster... somebody like a stroman to start with. We aren't letting Eddie walk and then burning what little currency we have in the minors to get AM. Our position of strength is pitching and we aren't acquiring all stars with anything less.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
User avatar
Kurtz
RealGM
Posts: 15,565
And1: 16,480
Joined: Aug 07, 2002
Location: Toronto

Re: Jays like Andrew McCutchen 

Post#5 » by Kurtz » Sun Dec 25, 2016 5:36 am

Shapiro and Atkins have been in this business an awfully long time, and in that time, they've never made the type of deal it would take to get McCutchen.

I wouldn't worry about it too much; it ain't happening.
Image
User avatar
Indiana Jones
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,121
And1: 1,548
Joined: Feb 21, 2007
Location: Assistant Dean of Students, Marshall College, Bedford, Connecticut
Contact:

Re: Jays like Andrew McCutchen 

Post#6 » by Indiana Jones » Sun Dec 25, 2016 3:14 pm

Just a rumor started to get people to forget about losing out on EE. Don't hold your breath on this trade happening.
Sticks
Rookie
Posts: 1,137
And1: 1,180
Joined: Jul 26, 2010

Re: Jays like Andrew McCutchen 

Post#7 » by Sticks » Sun Dec 25, 2016 4:25 pm

spykelee wrote:It would have to be from our roster... somebody like a stroman to start with. We aren't letting Eddie walk and then burning what little currency we have in the minors to get AM. Our position of strength is pitching and we aren't acquiring all stars with anything less.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


We can't afford to give up any of our starters. We have no depth in case we deal with injuries.

Sanchez
Happ
Estrada
Stroman
Liriano

Thats it amd we better hope for great luck with injuries. Giving up stroman would create a big hole.
Lukeem
Analyst
Posts: 3,280
And1: 2,578
Joined: Aug 02, 2012

Re: Jays like Andrew McCutchen 

Post#8 » by Lukeem » Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:31 pm

North_of_Border wrote:The Blue Jays are seeking outfield help and are open to trading for Pirates outfielder Andrew McCutchen, according to ESPN’s Jerry Crasnick.

----------------------------

So the Jays won't resign EE at a bargain price, only to save a comp draft pick. Yet they will further diminish their weak farm by trading a huge package for McCutchen, who is a FA after the season.

Does any of this make sense to you?

Cause I'm perplexed at the logic.



I really doubt it is more than a ploy if we did get McCutchen that would make Bautista even easier to say good bye to. Jose has already figured out his value isn't as high as he/ his agent thought

Also we didn't let edwin go by the sounds of it we offered as good or better deals than cleveland whether it was a screw up by his agent, jays jumping the gun on others or edwin not wanting to come back it just didn't work out.
Image
User avatar
Lateral Quicks
RealGM
Posts: 20,536
And1: 16,672
Joined: Dec 05, 2002
   

Re: Jays like Andrew McCutchen 

Post#9 » by Lateral Quicks » Mon Dec 26, 2016 5:19 pm

McCutchen had a pretty awful year in 2016, putting up -0.7 WAR. Could be trying to buy low. He'd still cost more prospect capital than the FO is willing to pay though.

Edit: Saw some speculation that Pillar might be included in a deal. I would do that. Most of Pillar's value comes from his defense, and I have concerns that he won't be able to keep the Superman act going much longer. He actually took a step back offensively last year, which was very disappointing since there is so much room for improvement. He is not the kind of player I would look to give a big money contract too. The main reason he's presented as a lock is because our outfield depth is so terrible at the moment. So two years of Cutch for a few years of Pillar makes some sense.

The other rumoured player heading the other way - Stroman - is arguably too much. Four years of low-cost control over Stroman > two years of control over Cutch after the year he put up in 2016.
Nick Nurse recounting his first meeting with Kawhi:
“We could have gone forever. (Raptors management) kept knocking on the door and I was like, ‘A couple more minutes.’ Because we were really into it."
User avatar
Skin Blues
Veteran
Posts: 2,625
And1: 872
Joined: Nov 24, 2010

Re: Jays like Andrew McCutchen 

Post#10 » by Skin Blues » Mon Dec 26, 2016 8:11 pm

Lateral Quicks wrote:The main reason he's presented as a lock is because our outfield depth is so terrible at the moment.

He's 16th in WAR among all MLB outfielders over the past 2 years. There isn't a team in the majors on which he wouldn't be a lock for being a full-time outfielder.
User avatar
Lateral Quicks
RealGM
Posts: 20,536
And1: 16,672
Joined: Dec 05, 2002
   

Re: Jays like Andrew McCutchen 

Post#11 » by Lateral Quicks » Mon Dec 26, 2016 9:18 pm

Skin Blues wrote:
Lateral Quicks wrote:The main reason he's presented as a lock is because our outfield depth is so terrible at the moment.

He's 16th in WAR among all MLB outfielders over the past 2 years. There isn't a team in the majors on which he wouldn't be a lock for being a full-time outfielder.


And, as I made clear, his value comes almost entirely from his defense. How long can he keep that up? He's entering his age 28 season and he's already played a few years on turf. If you think that's going to catch up to him sooner rather than later, selling high would be a wise move.

Of qualified outfielders, he was 53rd out of 54 in wRC+ last year with a mark of 80. Over the last two he's 46th out of 48. In the past I've actually been a big supporter of Pillar (when very few were, BTW), but my opinion has shifted with the total lack of any improvement offensively. When his defense stops being elite, we're talking about a replacement level player.

As to your second statement, let's not even go outside the division. Which of the Killer B's (Benintendi, Bradley Jr., or Betts) would you not take over Pillar?
Nick Nurse recounting his first meeting with Kawhi:
“We could have gone forever. (Raptors management) kept knocking on the door and I was like, ‘A couple more minutes.’ Because we were really into it."
User avatar
Skin Blues
Veteran
Posts: 2,625
And1: 872
Joined: Nov 24, 2010

Re: Jays like Andrew McCutchen 

Post#12 » by Skin Blues » Mon Dec 26, 2016 10:11 pm

Lateral Quicks wrote:
Skin Blues wrote:
Lateral Quicks wrote:The main reason he's presented as a lock is because our outfield depth is so terrible at the moment.

He's 16th in WAR among all MLB outfielders over the past 2 years. There isn't a team in the majors on which he wouldn't be a lock for being a full-time outfielder.


And, as I made clear, his value comes almost entirely from his defense. How long can he keep that up? He's entering his age 28 season and he's already played a few years on turf. If you think that's going to catch up to him sooner rather than later, selling high would be a wise move.

Of qualified outfielders, he was 53rd out of 54 in wRC+ last year with a mark of 80. Over the last two he's 46th out of 48. In the past I've actually been a big supporter of Pillar (when very few were, BTW), but my opinion has shifted with the total lack of any improvement offensively. When his defense stops being elite, we're talking about a replacement level player.

As to your second statement, let's not even go outside the division. Which of the Killer B's (Benintendi, Bradley Jr., or Betts) would you not take over Pillar?

You said he's a lock because the team is weak; that is obviously wrong. Then you steered the discussion away from the point I disputed, toward something completely different. I don't know how many more years he can keep up the elite defense, but I'm gonna bet that there isn't a monstrous decline in his age 28 season. I also don't think he's a good hitter so you don't need to point that out.

As for the Red Sox, Pillar would certainly come before Benintendi on the OF depth chart.

So, no. The main reason he's a lock isn't because the Jays have a weak OF. He's a lock because he's extremely valuable. As for cashing in on him because he might break down physically: the reasons you're giving aren't a secret. Everybody knows when defense peaks. Everybody knows he's played a few years on turf. Those pieces of information are only cause to trade him if we're the only ones that have it. Any team that is smart enough to value his defense isn't stupid enough to ignore the obvious downfalls that you noted.
User avatar
Lateral Quicks
RealGM
Posts: 20,536
And1: 16,672
Joined: Dec 05, 2002
   

Re: Jays like Andrew McCutchen 

Post#13 » by Lateral Quicks » Mon Dec 26, 2016 10:34 pm

Skin Blues wrote:
Lateral Quicks wrote:
Skin Blues wrote:He's 16th in WAR among all MLB outfielders over the past 2 years. There isn't a team in the majors on which he wouldn't be a lock for being a full-time outfielder.


And, as I made clear, his value comes almost entirely from his defense. How long can he keep that up? He's entering his age 28 season and he's already played a few years on turf. If you think that's going to catch up to him sooner rather than later, selling high would be a wise move.

Of qualified outfielders, he was 53rd out of 54 in wRC+ last year with a mark of 80. Over the last two he's 46th out of 48. In the past I've actually been a big supporter of Pillar (when very few were, BTW), but my opinion has shifted with the total lack of any improvement offensively. When his defense stops being elite, we're talking about a replacement level player.

As to your second statement, let's not even go outside the division. Which of the Killer B's (Benintendi, Bradley Jr., or Betts) would you not take over Pillar?

You said he's a lock because the team is weak; that is obviously wrong. Then you steered the discussion away from the point I disputed, toward something completely different. I don't know how many more years he can keep up the elite defense, but I'm gonna bet that there isn't a monstrous decline in his age 28 season. I also don't think he's a good hitter so you don't need to point that out.

As for the Red Sox, Pillar would certainly come before Benintendi on the OF depth chart.

So, no. The main reason he's a lock isn't because the Jays have a weak OF. He's a lock because he's extremely valuable. As for cashing in on him because he might break down physically: the reasons you're giving aren't a secret. Everybody knows when defense peaks. Everybody knows he's played a few years on turf. Those pieces of information are only cause to trade him if we're the only ones that have it. Any team that is smart enough to value his defense isn't stupid enough to ignore the obvious downfalls that you noted.


Actually, I steered the discussion back to the point I originally made - that his value comes entirely from his defense. I never questioned that he's been a valuable player the last two years. Successful front offices make decisions based on expected future performance, not past performance. It's a big reason we didn't sign EE, and probably why we won't extend Donaldson, either. Different front offices will have different expectations, leaving windows for trades to be made.

Benintendi has overmatched every level he's played. BA moved him ahead of Yoan Moncada as the Red Sox best prospect (and some had Moncada as the best prospect in baseball, period). There is no way Pillar would get playing time over Benintendi. Pillar would 100% be traded to make way.
Nick Nurse recounting his first meeting with Kawhi:
“We could have gone forever. (Raptors management) kept knocking on the door and I was like, ‘A couple more minutes.’ Because we were really into it."
User avatar
BigLeagueChew
RealGM
Posts: 10,041
And1: 4,088
Joined: May 26, 2011
Location: Catcher
     

Re: Jays like Andrew McCutchen 

Post#14 » by BigLeagueChew » Mon Dec 26, 2016 10:59 pm

What actually happened to McCutchen though. This is someone that most teams would have picked in their top 5 or top 10 easy 2 years ago. Any known injury that he was trying to play through?
The_Hater
GHOAT (Greatest Hater Of All Time)
Posts: 85,319
And1: 40,062
Joined: May 23, 2001
     

Re: Jays like Andrew McCutchen 

Post#15 » by The_Hater » Mon Dec 26, 2016 11:05 pm

Lateral Quicks wrote:
Skin Blues wrote:
Lateral Quicks wrote:The main reason he's presented as a lock is because our outfield depth is so terrible at the moment.

He's 16th in WAR among all MLB outfielders over the past 2 years. There isn't a team in the majors on which he wouldn't be a lock for being a full-time outfielder.


And, as I made clear, his value comes almost entirely from his defense. ?


That's a fairly shortsighted view though. He had a terrible offensive 2016 when he was barely above league average but he was one of the best offensive players in baseball from 2012-2015 and far above average from 2009-2011. Nothing is for certain but 2016 is almost certainly an aberration.
AthensBucks wrote:Lowry is done.
Nurse is below average at best.
Masai is overrated.
I dont get how so many people believe in the raptors,they have zero to chance to win it all.


April 14th, 2019.
User avatar
Lateral Quicks
RealGM
Posts: 20,536
And1: 16,672
Joined: Dec 05, 2002
   

Re: Jays like Andrew McCutchen 

Post#16 » by Lateral Quicks » Mon Dec 26, 2016 11:10 pm

The_Hater wrote:
Lateral Quicks wrote:
Skin Blues wrote:He's 16th in WAR among all MLB outfielders over the past 2 years. There isn't a team in the majors on which he wouldn't be a lock for being a full-time outfielder.


And, as I made clear, his value comes almost entirely from his defense. ?


That's a fairly shortsighted view though. He had a terrible offensive 2016 when he was barely above league average but he was one of the best offensive players in baseball from 2012-2015 and far above average from 2009-2011. Nothing is for certain but 2016 is almost certainly an aberration.


We were talking about Pillar there, not Cutch.
Nick Nurse recounting his first meeting with Kawhi:
“We could have gone forever. (Raptors management) kept knocking on the door and I was like, ‘A couple more minutes.’ Because we were really into it."
The_Hater
GHOAT (Greatest Hater Of All Time)
Posts: 85,319
And1: 40,062
Joined: May 23, 2001
     

Re: Jays like Andrew McCutchen 

Post#17 » by The_Hater » Mon Dec 26, 2016 11:17 pm

Lateral Quicks wrote:
The_Hater wrote:
Lateral Quicks wrote:
And, as I made clear, his value comes almost entirely from his defense. ?


That's a fairly shortsighted view though. He had a terrible offensive 2016 when he was barely above league average but he was one of the best offensive players in baseball from 2012-2015 and far above average from 2009-2011. Nothing is for certain but 2016 is almost certainly an aberration.


We were talking about Pillar there, not Cutch.


I figured that out after I wrote it. Ha.
AthensBucks wrote:Lowry is done.
Nurse is below average at best.
Masai is overrated.
I dont get how so many people believe in the raptors,they have zero to chance to win it all.


April 14th, 2019.
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 41,297
And1: 14,311
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: Jays like Andrew McCutchen 

Post#18 » by dagger » Tue Dec 27, 2016 7:22 pm

Read on Twitter
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
User avatar
McBlunt
Junior
Posts: 347
And1: 227
Joined: Sep 25, 2016
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Contact:
         

Re: Jays like Andrew McCutchen 

Post#19 » by McBlunt » Tue Dec 27, 2016 9:11 pm

North_of_Border wrote:The Blue Jays are seeking outfield help and are open to trading for Pirates outfielder Andrew McCutchen, according to ESPN’s Jerry Crasnick.

----------------------------

So the Jays won't resign EE at a bargain price, only to save a comp draft pick. Yet they will further diminish their weak farm by trading a huge package for McCutchen, who is a FA after the season.

Does any of this make sense to you?

Cause I'm perplexed at the logic.


First Thing: The Blue Jays arent the reason Edwin isn't a BlueJay anymore, last time I checked he's the one that turned down the best contract he was offered in Free Agency that the BlueJays offered him. 2: The BlueJays need to Replace Bautista who can no longer play in the OF and they were going hard after Fowler but failed to sign him, they tried to get Eaton couldn't, McCutchen has less power than Jose but he has a productive bat is a good OF positionally. He's better than Jay Bruce. Yes this does make sense.
Image
North_of_Border
Pro Prospect
Posts: 910
And1: 369
Joined: May 18, 2014
   

Re: Jays like Andrew McCutchen 

Post#20 » by North_of_Border » Wed Dec 28, 2016 3:28 am

Considering what the Pirates wanted from Washington. This is what it would realistically cost.

- Vlad + Stroman + Urena + Foley

...... I'm gonna puke.

Return to Toronto Blue Jays