Skin Blues wrote:So if I start a thread about a Blue Jays reporter being re-assigned to a different sport because she was caught allegedly sleeping with multiple players on the Jays, it wouldn't be removed? Please don't pretend that the information was deleted because it was off-topic.
Oh, it'd be removed, assuming the source was the same as previous. It's been posted twice now, once sourcing a TMZ wannabee, and once citing Dean Blundell (who was sourcing it from the TMZ wannabee). Yeah, no.
I don't just mean "irrelevant to the thread". I mean irrelevant overall. Even with sourcing that wasn't a garbage fire, I'd need real convincing that it mattered. But combined with the complete lack of anything approaching a genuine source, we aren't going there.
A reporter lost her job because she broke workplace rules. Obviously it interests a lot of people, just like the Zaun story. There are reports that she was sent away from the team to placate a certain player's significant other, so if anything this affects the team on the field much more than a mouthpiece that has almost zero interaction with the players.
A reporter moved to a different job. That's the only credibly sourced part of it.
**** your asterisk.