Geddy wrote:Jays probably get a young middle infielder, young pitching prospect that never met expectations, and old stretch reliever.
wtf? I can't believe my eyes. It's you...it's really you
Moderator: JaysRule15
Geddy wrote:Jays probably get a young middle infielder, young pitching prospect that never met expectations, and old stretch reliever.
sule wrote:There was also little effort beyond 2015. All their acquisitions pointed to putting out a team that meanders for the next few years.
My worry is that they are going to waste Vlad Jr's first few years, and by the time he's ready to re-sign, this team won't be good enough and won't want to pony up.
It's the fact that he's basically going to be the first one up for this rebuild that is troublesome. This FO completely bungled the timing. I've said it many times. Either have a team that's on the cusp of competing so he can add to a strong roster, or they should've initiated the rebuild after the playoff loss to Cleveland, and had some strong prospects already on their way up by the time Vlad Jr. was coming up.
The way this FO handled this all, neither is an option. We can disagree, but I have a feeling it's going to be the Delgado situation all over again.
Schad wrote:sule wrote:There was also little effort beyond 2015. All their acquisitions pointed to putting out a team that meanders for the next few years.
Because we'd already traded away our farm system and had a payroll of over $160m. There wasn't a hell of a lot they could do but meander; that was what AA left us with.My worry is that they are going to waste Vlad Jr's first few years, and by the time he's ready to re-sign, this team won't be good enough and won't want to pony up.
That's a concern. Ideally, we should have torn the team down earlier as a result.It's the fact that he's basically going to be the first one up for this rebuild that is troublesome. This FO completely bungled the timing. I've said it many times. Either have a team that's on the cusp of competing so he can add to a strong roster, or they should've initiated the rebuild after the playoff loss to Cleveland, and had some strong prospects already on their way up by the time Vlad Jr. was coming up.
We should have initiated the rebuild earlier. It isn't really the FO's fault, however; it's ownership.The way this FO handled this all, neither is an option. We can disagree, but I have a feeling it's going to be the Delgado situation all over again.
i fear that as well, but I don't think it's the FO.
vaff87 wrote:We have any idea what specific bag of chips we traded him for yet?
sule wrote:Schad wrote:sule wrote:There was also little effort beyond 2015. All their acquisitions pointed to putting out a team that meanders for the next few years.
Because we'd already traded away our farm system and had a payroll of over $160m. There wasn't a hell of a lot they could do but meander; that was what AA left us with.My worry is that they are going to waste Vlad Jr's first few years, and by the time he's ready to re-sign, this team won't be good enough and won't want to pony up.
That's a concern. Ideally, we should have torn the team down earlier as a result.It's the fact that he's basically going to be the first one up for this rebuild that is troublesome. This FO completely bungled the timing. I've said it many times. Either have a team that's on the cusp of competing so he can add to a strong roster, or they should've initiated the rebuild after the playoff loss to Cleveland, and had some strong prospects already on their way up by the time Vlad Jr. was coming up.
We should have initiated the rebuild earlier. It isn't really the FO's fault, however; it's ownership.The way this FO handled this all, neither is an option. We can disagree, but I have a feeling it's going to be the Delgado situation all over again.
i fear that as well, but I don't think it's the FO.
Regarding your first point, I think if they were going to meander, they could've attempted a better job at acquiring "name" players and not been so adament on dumpster diving to fill the roster. That's neither here nor there anymore.
Regarding ownership, I still don't see any proof that ownership has forced their hand outside of conjecture. So we're going to have to disagree that marketing contention was all on ownership. Besides, if this front office can't sell the ownership on their vision of how to build this team, then how can we trust them to sell upping the budget when it is time to re-sign guys like Vlad Jr. and Bo?
Fairview4Life wrote:sule wrote:Schad wrote:
Because we'd already traded away our farm system and had a payroll of over $160m. There wasn't a hell of a lot they could do but meander; that was what AA left us with.
That's a concern. Ideally, we should have torn the team down earlier as a result.
We should have initiated the rebuild earlier. It isn't really the FO's fault, however; it's ownership.
i fear that as well, but I don't think it's the FO.
Regarding your first point, I think if they were going to meander, they could've attempted a better job at acquiring "name" players and not been so adament on dumpster diving to fill the roster. That's neither here nor there anymore.
Regarding ownership, I still don't see any proof that ownership has forced their hand outside of conjecture. So we're going to have to disagree that marketing contention was all on ownership. Besides, if this front office can't sell the ownership on their vision of how to build this team, then how can we trust them to sell upping the budget when it is time to re-sign guys like Vlad Jr. and Bo?
The "conjecture" involves being a fan of te team for more than 5 years though. It's born of experience.
sule wrote:The_Hater wrote:Double Helix wrote:How many years do you guys think it will be until the Jays are in a position to challenge again in the playoffs?
More than 3 than years?
More than 5 years?
More than 10 years?
None of the above. 3 seasons from now.
We have a very smart management team in place, now we just need ownership to back off and let them do their job. Meddling ownership has already cost us greatly by trying to compete in 2018. It probably cost us 2 full seasons of rebuilding and several assets.
But how did they try to compete? They didn't expand the payroll. The fan turnout has been severely dwindling the last two years. And there's not a single move anyone can point to over the last 3 years that indicates this front office has been attempting to put a team out there that can compete.
AthensBucks wrote:Lowry is done.
Nurse is below average at best.
Masai is overrated.
I dont get how so many people believe in the raptors,they have zero to chance to win it all.
vaff87 wrote:We have any idea what specific bag of chips we traded him for yet?
sule wrote:Regarding your first point, I think if they were going to meander, they could've attempted a better job at acquiring "name" players and not been so adament on dumpster diving to fill the roster. That's neither here nor there anymore.
Regarding ownership, I still don't see any proof that ownership has forced their hand outside of conjecture. So we're going to have to disagree that marketing contention was all on ownership. Besides, if this front office can't sell the ownership on their vision of how to build this team, then how can we trust them to sell upping the budget when it is time to re-sign guys like Vlad Jr. and Bo?
So_Fresh wrote:Should have traded him after the 2016 season. What a nighmare season this has been.. Now who's going to play 3rd for us for the remainder of the season? Martin? lol.. what a **** joke this organization is.
AthensBucks wrote:Lowry is done.
Nurse is below average at best.
Masai is overrated.
I dont get how so many people believe in the raptors,they have zero to chance to win it all.
The_Hater wrote:sule wrote:The_Hater wrote:
None of the above. 3 seasons from now.
We have a very smart management team in place, now we just need ownership to back off and let them do their job. Meddling ownership has already cost us greatly by trying to compete in 2018. It probably cost us 2 full seasons of rebuilding and several assets.
But how did they try to compete? They didn't expand the payroll. The fan turnout has been severely dwindling the last two years. And there's not a single move anyone can point to over the last 3 years that indicates this front office has been attempting to put a team out there that can compete.
They actually had the 8th largest payroll in MLB on opening day, 2018. The Yankees were 9th.
On top of all the shortsighted moves they made trying to put a competitive team on the field the past 2 seasons, the bigger mistake was they made no attempt to trade their veterans for prospects and hung onto JD, Happ, Smoak, and many others much longer than they should have. What they were left with was grossly diminished value or sometimes no trade value on these vets. Poor asset management stunts the rebuilding process.
The_Hater wrote:So_Fresh wrote:Should have traded him after the 2016 season. What a nighmare season this has been.. Now who's going to play 3rd for us for the remainder of the season? Martin? lol.. what a **** joke this organization is.
There was no chance they were trading him after 2016, the team had back to back playoff appearances and was rightfully looking to try and extend it for a 3rd. But they absolutely should have traded him last off-season. The team had fallen off, JD was a pending free agent and Vlade and Bichette were getting close to the majors. There little doubt in my mind that ownership blocked management from trading their biggest star.