bluerap23 wrote:It is a pretty significant 180 since Shapiro came with the farm system. I believe they were ranked 22 when he came over. There was an interesting caller on the fan that asked baseball central hosts "what is the best move Shapiro has made since his arrival"? They were literally speechless for a full minute. Eventually they settled on Happ signing and Teoscar acquisition as #2. It is comical how little they've done for the big league team, but you have to credit them for developing the farm while having their hands tied by ownership with respect to trading off JD, etc.
The interesting thing that I have noted is that the current regime focuses on drafting high value position prospects (SS, etc.), while AA was definitely more focused on pitching.
I wonder if there are some analytics on success rate comparison between pitching and position. If you look at all those great pitching prospects AA drafted, hardly any of them have panned out.
Perhaps this admin thinks they can buy the pitching in free agency once the offence is developed.
Position prospects are definitely more valuable than pitching prospects, all things being equal. The problem with pitching is that it's so ridiculously hard and can appear and disappear in the blink of an eye for totally unexpected reasons, if any reasons at all. Sanchez went from intriguing reliever to future Cy Young winner to chump pretty darn fast.
The thing people fail to see with moves when they start talking about the big club vs the farm is that it isn't actually one or the other - they're interconnected. A move to support the farm IS a move to support the big club, we just don't know how it's going to support the big club just yet, if it will at all. Heck, it's hard enough to tell if trading for/signing vets are going to actually support the big club or not. AA dumped a TON of prospect collateral for veterans over the years. The Dickey trade is really the one that burns - AA was actually pretty poor at building a farm overall but was also willing to trade his draftees quickly. On the whole, it was worth it, but it came with a cost that needed to be paid in the future, and we're seeing the costs now.
The best move Atkins has made for the Jays is
not to make too many short-sighted moves. Right now I think it might be drafting and keeping Bo Bichette, but there are loads of possibilities out there. The mindset of constantly trying to patch things over at the cost of the future is very similar to the idea that we shouldn't suffer economically now to try to stop human caused climate change. It's kicking the can down the road that's going to be paid in one way or the other in the future. Oh, but we can figure that out later? Sure! At least in baseball there will always be future draft picks to mortgage. It's an approach that doesn't actually work all that well, though. Even the big teams that spend truckloads of money tend not to operate that way.