Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
Moderator: JaysRule15
Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,312
- And1: 3,013
- Joined: Nov 02, 2006
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,312
- And1: 3,013
- Joined: Nov 02, 2006
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 37,527
- And1: 20,997
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
Wagner was the true prize of the Kikuchi deal
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 37,527
- And1: 20,997
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
3 for 3 for Wagner, back to the bench tomorrow
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 69,935
- And1: 33,791
- Joined: Jul 25, 2005
-
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
Feels like we’re rooting for the Cardinals with these random ass named dudes hitting the ball.
9. Similarly, IF THOU HAST SPENT the entire offseason predicting that thy team will stink, thou shalt not gloat, nor even be happy, shouldst thou turn out to be correct. Realistic analysis is fine, but be a fan first, a smug smarty-pants second.
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
- SharoneWright
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,263
- And1: 12,993
- Joined: Aug 03, 2006
- Location: A pig in a cage on antibiotics
-
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
Randle McMurphy wrote:3 for 3 for Wagner, back to the bench tomorrow

Is anybody here a marine biologist?
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
- RaoulDuke79
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,860
- And1: 5,115
- Joined: Jul 31, 2006
- Location: purchasing stunning amounts of pudding.
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
Very cool to see Billy's kid get 3 hits in his debut - I hope he pans out for ya'll.
We watched the tragedy unfold. We did as we were told, we bought and sold. It was the greatest show on Earth...but then it was over.
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
- Lateral Quicks
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,530
- And1: 16,661
- Joined: Dec 05, 2002
-
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
Whatever you do Wagner, don't listen to Guillermo. Pretend he isn't even there.
Wagner is exactly the kind of hitter I like - hits for average, walks a lot, and limits the Ks. This kind of skillset is hugely underrated in today's MLB (unless you have elite speed to go along with it). Wagner has a career minor league OBP over .400, and this year in AAA he's struck out far less than he's walked. I think we may have something here. I just wish Guillermo was long gone so that he can't ruin yet another prospect.
Wagner is exactly the kind of hitter I like - hits for average, walks a lot, and limits the Ks. This kind of skillset is hugely underrated in today's MLB (unless you have elite speed to go along with it). Wagner has a career minor league OBP over .400, and this year in AAA he's struck out far less than he's walked. I think we may have something here. I just wish Guillermo was long gone so that he can't ruin yet another prospect.
Nick Nurse recounting his first meeting with Kawhi:
“We could have gone forever. (Raptors management) kept knocking on the door and I was like, ‘A couple more minutes.’ Because we were really into it."
“We could have gone forever. (Raptors management) kept knocking on the door and I was like, ‘A couple more minutes.’ Because we were really into it."
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,431
- And1: 2,128
- Joined: Feb 25, 2004
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
Randle McMurphy wrote:3 for 3 for Wagner, back to the bench tomorrow
Nah, Wagner is an elite big leaguer’s son. If anything he will play too much.
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
- Lateral Quicks
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,530
- And1: 16,661
- Joined: Dec 05, 2002
-
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
Randle McMurphy wrote:3 for 3 for Wagner, back to the bench tomorrow
Probably needs some one on one time with Guillermo.
I kid you not, Schneider's season disintegrated the day after the headline that he and some of the other young guys were sitting out the next game because they were putting in extra work with Guillermo.
Nick Nurse recounting his first meeting with Kawhi:
“We could have gone forever. (Raptors management) kept knocking on the door and I was like, ‘A couple more minutes.’ Because we were really into it."
“We could have gone forever. (Raptors management) kept knocking on the door and I was like, ‘A couple more minutes.’ Because we were really into it."
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
- Boogie!
- RealGM
- Posts: 65,541
- And1: 55,630
- Joined: Oct 27, 2005
- Location: Ba da da da daaaaaa. If you build it, they will come!
- Contact:
-
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
Is Wagner our Steven kwan
mdenny wrote:In anycase....Masai is probably gonna make Fred the first active player/head coach in franchise history now that Nurse is out of the way. That's been the plan all along.
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 37,527
- And1: 20,997
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
Guillermo doesn’t like what he sees in Wagner, too much pull power
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
- LBJKB24MJ23
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,052
- And1: 21,511
- Joined: Jan 22, 2014
- Location: Bermuda
-
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
Wagner looks great. And a lefty.
Kids looking good.
Kids looking good.
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
- Boogie!
- RealGM
- Posts: 65,541
- And1: 55,630
- Joined: Oct 27, 2005
- Location: Ba da da da daaaaaa. If you build it, they will come!
- Contact:
-
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
Wagner looks good at the plate but he keeps bricking these throws in the dirt
mdenny wrote:In anycase....Masai is probably gonna make Fred the first active player/head coach in franchise history now that Nurse is out of the way. That's been the plan all along.
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
- Hottie McShotty
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,858
- And1: 2,285
- Joined: Mar 09, 2021
-
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
Did this team just hit 4HRs in one game?? Unreal.
This Wagner kid is looking good! We might have something here.
This Wagner kid is looking good! We might have something here.
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 37,527
- And1: 20,997
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
- Hottie McShotty
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,858
- And1: 2,285
- Joined: Mar 09, 2021
-
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
Blue Jays' Wagner won't start vs. Angels. This team not so serious.
You really have to question the logic of the management of this team.
You really have to question the logic of the management of this team.
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,456
- And1: 5,988
- Joined: Jun 16, 2015
-
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
Lateral Quicks wrote:Whatever you do Wagner, don't listen to Guillermo. Pretend he isn't even there.
Wagner is exactly the kind of hitter I like - hits for average, walks a lot, and limits the Ks. This kind of skillset is hugely underrated in today's MLB (unless you have elite speed to go along with it). Wagner has a career minor league OBP over .400, and this year in AAA he's struck out far less than he's walked. I think we may have something here. I just wish Guillermo was long gone so that he can't ruin yet another prospect.
Are you guys still blaming hitting coaches for vlad or do they get credit lol. Those hitters step in the batters box not Guillermo.
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
- SharoneWright
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,263
- And1: 12,993
- Joined: Aug 03, 2006
- Location: A pig in a cage on antibiotics
-
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
polo007 wrote:
Ok Jays marketing. And where there’s no Will, there’s no way!
Schneider says he sits, partially because of a lingering knee issue, but don’t worry he’s available to pinch run?!

Is anybody here a marine biologist?
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
- Lateral Quicks
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,530
- And1: 16,661
- Joined: Dec 05, 2002
-
Re: Toronto Blue Jays (54 - 64) at Los Angeles Angels (52 - 66)
johanliebert wrote:Lateral Quicks wrote:Whatever you do Wagner, don't listen to Guillermo. Pretend he isn't even there.
Wagner is exactly the kind of hitter I like - hits for average, walks a lot, and limits the Ks. This kind of skillset is hugely underrated in today's MLB (unless you have elite speed to go along with it). Wagner has a career minor league OBP over .400, and this year in AAA he's struck out far less than he's walked. I think we may have something here. I just wish Guillermo was long gone so that he can't ruin yet another prospect.
Are you guys still blaming hitting coaches for vlad or do they get credit lol. Those hitters step in the batters box not Guillermo.
By that logic, it doesn't matter who serves as hitting coach.
Bo had to bring in his Dad to help him.
Vlad had to bring in 3rd party coaches to help him.
How many players have become better hitters under Guillermo? How many have become worse?
The results speak for themselves. He should have been fired years ago. I consider his continued employment the height of negligence. It's like they're trying to fail.
Nick Nurse recounting his first meeting with Kawhi:
“We could have gone forever. (Raptors management) kept knocking on the door and I was like, ‘A couple more minutes.’ Because we were really into it."
“We could have gone forever. (Raptors management) kept knocking on the door and I was like, ‘A couple more minutes.’ Because we were really into it."