Page 1 of 2
Riccardi: We have no interest in Wilson
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 6:18 pm
by stro4swift
22nd July, 2007 - 11:01 am
Post-Gazette - The Pirates have made known to other teams that shortstop Jack Wilson is available, and the Toronto Blue Jays are interested.
But any trade is unlikely to happen until after Major League Baseball's July 31 non-waiver deadline, mostly because the Pirates surely will be asked to pick up a significant portion of the $14.25 million Wilson is owed after this season. Such deals tend to take more than the nine days remaining before the deadline, and no firm talks are known to have begun with any team.
After July 31, there is another month in which trades can be made if a player clears waivers, but Wilson is no certainty to do that. That makes the offseason more likely.
http://www.realgmbaseball.com/src_wiret ... hs_wilson/
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 6:53 pm
by evilRyu
Can anyone explain to me why this Wilson dude is earning 14.25 million?? Please tell me it's for more than 1 year
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 6:59 pm
by SmallTownJournalist303
Wilson's an unbelievable defensive shortstop, but he's 29 and hits like Royce Clayton. I don't see how this is much of an upgrade. We might as well start Johnny Mac if we're looking for an all-glove no-bat shortstop (which I'm not advising in any way, shape, or form).
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 10:39 pm
by beater97
ugghh another one of these SS?
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 10:58 pm
by Raptor_Guy
Might as well just start Johnny Mac every game...
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 1:06 am
by stro4swift
Yeah I don't think we need him either. He's a defensive master but I think we need some pop even at the SS position, being in the AL.
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:25 am
by Sai Young
heard we are tradin glaus to either angels or padres
what current players or prospects might we be interested
and they opposing team willin to give up?
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:42 am
by jalenrose#5
Sai Young wrote:heard we are tradin glaus to either angels or padres
what current players or prospects might we be interested
and they opposing team willin to give up?
From the Angels....
1B/DH Dallas McPherson
1B/2B Howie Kendrick
SS Brandon Wood
SP Ervin Santana
SS/2B Erick Aybar
OF Reggie Willits
SP Joe Suanders
C Mike Napoli/ Jeff Mathis
OF Nathan Haynes (AAA)
3B Freddy Sondaval (AA)
Closer Jose Arrendo (AA)
A package of Wood/Saunders/Willits might be enough for me there.
From the Padres...
SP Clay Hensley
SP Chris Young or Jake Peavy (probably not though)
C Josh Bard
SS Khalil Greene
C Pete Laforest.....just for Canuck kicks (AAA)
SP Justin Germano (AAA)
3B Chase Headley (AA)
SP Josh Greer (AA)
A package of Greene/Germano/Headley would be enough for me to pull the deal.
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:16 pm
by Banger_bro
jalenrose#5 wrote:Sai Young wrote:heard we are tradin glaus to either angels or padres
what current players or prospects might we be interested
and they opposing team willin to give up?
From the Angels....
1B/DH Dallas McPherson
1B/2B Howie Kendrick
SS Brandon Wood
SP Ervin Santana
SS/2B Erick Aybar
OF Reggie Willits
SP Joe Suanders
C Mike Napoli/ Jeff Mathis
OF Nathan Haynes (AAA)
3B Freddy Sondaval (AA)
Closer Jose Arrendo (AA)
A package of Wood/Saunders/Willits might be enough for me there.
From the Padres...
SP Clay Hensley
SP Chris Young or Jake Peavy (probably not though)
C Josh Bard
SS Khalil Greene
C Pete Laforest.....just for Canuck kicks (AAA)
SP Justin Germano (AAA)
3B Chase Headley (AA)
SP Josh Greer (AA)
A package of Greene/Germano/Headley would be enough for me to pull the deal.
I think you might be over valuing Glaus here. Toronto would have to eat a TON of Troy's contract in order for either team to give up anything remotely close to that.
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:20 pm
by OldNo7
Sai Young wrote:heard we are tradin glaus to either angels or padres
what current players or prospects might we be interested
and they opposing team willin to give up?
Heard from where? This is an incredibly broad statement with no backing, especially with Riccardi being adament that he isnt trading anyone signed for next year.
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:30 pm
by Banger_bro
whosthebosh? wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Heard from where? This is an incredibly broad statement with no backing, especially with Riccardi being adament that he isnt trading anyone signed for next year.
Jeff Blair - The Globe and Mail.
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:38 pm
by OldNo7
Banger_bro wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Jeff Blair - The Globe and Mail.
That's just his opinion, its not something that is going to happen, a sure thing, or even anything discussed anywhere else really.
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 5:12 pm
by jalenrose#5
Banger_bro wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I think you might be over valuing Glaus here. Toronto would have to eat a TON of Troy's contract in order for either team to give up anything remotely close to that.
I don't think I'm overvaluing him at all.
Troy is the 2nd best 3B in the AL.....tell me someone better than him and then we'll see.
Bos....Lowell (Fenway Park makes him good)
Bal.....Mora (Solid....but not at Troy's Level)
TB......Iwamura (Nope)
Cle.....Blake (Solid, but still not at Troy's Level)
Min.....Punto (LOL)
Det.....Inge (Has power, but that's about it)
CWS...Crede (Too many injuries, bad avg, stellar D...Troy edges here)
Sea....Beltre (Solid, but his best years have passed)
Tex.....Blalock (Overrated IMO)
Oak.....Chavez (Bad avg, average power....stellar defender....Troy edges)
Ana.....THEY WANT TROY
Then Arod....it can also be argued if he was moved to say the BOSox, he'd be a SS making Troy now the best 3B in the AL.
He was dealt originally for a #3 starter and our starting 2B who eventually turned out to be an allstar. He was coming off a bad year and I think came at a discount price.
I think it's all in how you see it but really...a package of prospects for a top 2 3B is really solid for both sides IMO.
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:15 pm
by Banger_bro
whosthebosh? wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
That's just his opinion, its not something that is going to happen, a sure thing, or even anything discussed anywhere else really.
Yeah, but you just asked where he heard it.
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 7:09 pm
by Griff83
[quote="jalenrose#5"][/quote]
Beltre is 28 years old, since when is that when a players best years are behind him? Troy might certainly be the 2nd best 3rd basemen in the AL, but the crop of 3rd basemen is junk so I wouldnt try to base his value off of that. Troy might be worth 2 prospects and a already proven major league but he's certainly not worth possibly the best 3rd base prospect in the minors, Willits who has been one of the better rookies in the AL this season and a capable lefty in Saunders. Wood and Saunders is alot more realistic then thinking you'll also get a young player like Willits added in.
I find it funny you mention SD and even had the audasity to throw Young and Peavy's name out there. You also forget to mention prolly the player that we would most covet from the Padres if we were trading our current 3rd basemen and thats Kevin Kouzmanoff. Id say if we are going to trade Glaus a 3rd basemen needs to come back even if its just a prospect.
Id do a Kouzmanoff/pitcher(Royce Ring) for Glaus trade and Im sure so would the Padres seeing there offense is horrible and they need a bat if they want to make any noise in the playoffs.
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:18 pm
by SmallTownJournalist303
BlueJay_ wrote:Id do a Kouzmanoff/pitcher(Royce Ring) for Glaus trade and Im sure so would the Padres seeing there offense is horrible and they need a bat if they want to make any noise in the playoffs.
That'd be an absolutely terrible package for Glaus. Kouz would be ok but he's struggling this year and he's already 26. Ring is a generic, league average reliever who almost has as many walks as strikeouts.
jalenrose#5 might be overvaluing him slightly (I don't think the Angels would want to involve Wood in any Glaus deal; him plus another solid pitching prospect is pushing it somewhat), but I think you're undervaluing him severely.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 12:52 am
by Griff83
SmallTownJournalist303 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
That'd be an absolutely terrible package for Glaus. Kouz would be ok but he's struggling this year and he's already 26. Ring is a generic, league average reliever who almost has as many walks as strikeouts.
jalenrose#5 might be overvaluing him slightly (I don't think the Angels would want to involve Wood in any Glaus deal; him plus another solid pitching prospect is pushing it somewhat), but I think you're undervaluing him severely.
Maybe im undervalueing him but my offer is alot closer to reality then Brandon Wood, Reggie Willits and Saunders. Thats arguable the best 3rd best prospect in the minors, a guy whos been awesome for the Angels this season as a rookie in Willits and a decent lefty in Saunders? Im sorry but what I proposed is closer to Glaus's value then what he did. Kouzmanoff might be struggling but its just his first full season and he's already shown very good power potential and dont forget he hits in a tough ballpark to put up good stats in those cats. Put him in the Rogers center on a daily basis and his power numbers would jump nicely. Ring might not be good filler, switch him with Germano and call it a day.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 1:43 am
by beater97
IF we could get Wood, that would just be crazy awesome!
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 2:29 am
by OldNo7
I would be happy with something in between those 2 offers.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 2:59 am
by jalenrose#5
You guys have your opinion...btw...the Peavy/Young suggestion was sarcasm...should've used green font.
The crop of 3B in the NL >>>>> AL....so maybe Troy is a top 10 in MLB. But with that said, I'd take Wood/Saunders anyday for him....I'd add Willilts if we add Johnson.