ImageImageImageImageImage

Series Thread: Jays vs. Indians, May 4-5

Moderator: JaysRule15

User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,572
And1: 18,058
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Series Thread: Jays vs. Indians, May 4-5 

Post#1 » by Schad » Sun May 3, 2009 10:56 pm

A pretty odd series here...the Jays play a night/day two-gamer against the Indians before jetting out to the West Coast for two against the Angels. These games against Cleveland could be high-scoring affairs, as the Jays send out a newly-minted starter in Tallet and a guy making his ML debut in Cecil against a pair of starters who thus far can do no right.

May 4 - 7:00 EST start, Sportsnet

Indians win, 9-7. W - Betancourt (1-1), L - Camp (0-1). Josh Barfield, 2-2, 1 RBI and 2 runs scored off the bench.



May 5 - 12:30 EST start, Sportsnet

Jays win, 10-6. W - Wolfe (1-0), L - Chulk (0-1). Adam Lind, 3-4, 1 HR, 5 RBIs, 2 runs scored.
Image
**** your asterisk.
User avatar
MjJunkYard
Veteran
Posts: 2,615
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 09, 2004

Re: Series Thread: Jays vs. Indians, May 4-5 

Post#2 » by MjJunkYard » Sun May 3, 2009 11:05 pm

Schadenfreude, I would be pissed off because you deleted my thread, but the Jays are 18-9, so I'm in a good mood.
"Risk more than others think is safe. Care more than others think is wise. Dream more than others think is practical. Expect more than others think is possible."
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,572
And1: 18,058
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: Series Thread: Jays vs. Indians, May 4-5 

Post#3 » by Schad » Sun May 3, 2009 11:14 pm

Heh, I didn't intend to delete it...I tried to merge them, a skill I've never mastered, and now I can't figure out what happened to it. That said, o'er the last year a won series means the person that made the last one continues to make them until we lose (which is why we forced poor Sensi to make them for the first month), so if we split the two-gamer, feel free to take up the reins.
Image
**** your asterisk.
User avatar
MjJunkYard
Veteran
Posts: 2,615
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 09, 2004

Re: Series Thread: Jays vs. Indians, May 4-5 

Post#4 » by MjJunkYard » Sun May 3, 2009 11:39 pm

No worries Schadenfreude, I just wanted an explaination of why mine was deleted. Your cover page was better than mine anyways.

I can't wait to watch Cecil pitch, hopefully he holds up the fort. Tallet used to play for Cleveland, he should have extra motivation when he faces his old team who abandoned him.
"Risk more than others think is safe. Care more than others think is wise. Dream more than others think is practical. Expect more than others think is possible."
evilRyu
General Manager
Posts: 8,394
And1: 2
Joined: Jan 23, 2006

Re: Series Thread: Jays vs. Indians, May 4-5 

Post#5 » by evilRyu » Mon May 4, 2009 12:14 am

MjJunkYard, you definitely have dibs for the next series.. go for it and bring us more series wins :)

that said, i think we should clear up what happens in a tied series... i think the original author should still continue even in a tie since it wasn't really a series lost.. but that's just my opinion.
s e n s i
RealGM
Posts: 17,098
And1: 3,629
Joined: Mar 19, 2008
Location: Toronto
       

Re: Series Thread: Jays vs. Indians, May 4-5 

Post#6 » by s e n s i » Mon May 4, 2009 1:02 am

A win tomorrow puts us 10 games over .500. That looks really nice. I'm still admiring and often staring at the standings, seeing us 1st in the AL. Oh so nice.
galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.

Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).
Peteros
Inactive user
Inactive user
Posts: 2,294
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 22, 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: Series Thread: Jays vs. Indians, May 4-5 

Post#7 » by Peteros » Mon May 4, 2009 1:59 am

Yes who would of ever thought we would lead the majors in so many categories. It's still early, but it's nice to see us get this start.

Richmond has impressed me the most from our pitching staff. 4-0 with an ERA of 2.67
That's a better record than the Doc. Nice!

Let's see how we do with the Indians the next 2 games. Both games are winnable.
User avatar
TR50
General Manager
Posts: 7,555
And1: 1,222
Joined: Dec 19, 2004
       

Re: Series Thread: Jays vs. Indians, May 4-5 

Post#8 » by TR50 » Mon May 4, 2009 3:34 am

Schad you have an error there...Mondays game is May 4th :P
User avatar
TR50
General Manager
Posts: 7,555
And1: 1,222
Joined: Dec 19, 2004
       

Re: Series Thread: Jays vs. Indians, May 4-5 

Post#9 » by TR50 » Mon May 4, 2009 3:42 am

i was bored and just looking at the Jays home-grown players and saw McGowan and someone else were 'Supplemental Picks'....what exactly is a Supplemental pick? I know what a Rule 5 draft pick is but not this, is it picks you get when your Type A/B players sign elsewhere?
User avatar
Geddy
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 69,890
And1: 78,609
Joined: Nov 30, 2005
Location: Drinking an extra cole Sprite
 

Re: Series Thread: Jays vs. Indians, May 4-5 

Post#10 » by Geddy » Mon May 4, 2009 4:08 am

The Stache will not stand for two straight losses and will get revenge on the Indians

Image
Inevitable wrote:Geddy is a good mod actually
User avatar
MjJunkYard
Veteran
Posts: 2,615
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 09, 2004

Re: Series Thread: Jays vs. Indians, May 4-5 

Post#11 » by MjJunkYard » Mon May 4, 2009 4:09 am

toronto_raptors50 wrote:i was bored and just looking at the Jays home-grown players and saw McGowan and someone else were 'Supplemental Picks'....what exactly is a Supplemental pick? I know what a Rule 5 draft pick is but not this, is it picks you get when your Type A/B players sign elsewhere?


A suplimental pick is compensation for losing a HIGH PRICED free agent. (I.E. The Blue Jays lost A.J. Burnett, so they will be given one suplimental pick in the 2009 draft).

Suplimental draft picks are given after round 1 is complete in the draft. Say the Washington Nationals had the worst record in baseball last year and lost three Type 1 free agents (high priced), they would get 3 additional draft picks after round one is complete. The next worst team in baseball Kansas City didn't lose any Type 1 Free Agents, so they don't get any suplimental pick. Next is the team with the third worst record in 2008 and so on...................Suplimental picks are given in order of a teams record; with the worst teams being able to use their suplimental picks first.

I hope that helps.
"Risk more than others think is safe. Care more than others think is wise. Dream more than others think is practical. Expect more than others think is possible."
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,572
And1: 18,058
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: Series Thread: Jays vs. Indians, May 4-5 

Post#12 » by Schad » Mon May 4, 2009 4:49 am

MjJunkYard wrote:
toronto_raptors50 wrote:i was bored and just looking at the Jays home-grown players and saw McGowan and someone else were 'Supplemental Picks'....what exactly is a Supplemental pick? I know what a Rule 5 draft pick is but not this, is it picks you get when your Type A/B players sign elsewhere?


A suplimental pick is compensation for losing a HIGH PRICED free agent. (I.E. The Blue Jays lost A.J. Burnett, so they will be given one suplimental pick in the 2009 draft).

Suplimental draft picks are given after round 1 is complete in the draft. Say the Washington Nationals had the worst record in baseball last year and lost three Type 1 free agents (high priced), they would get 3 additional draft picks after round one is complete. The next worst team in baseball Kansas City didn't lose any Type 1 Free Agents, so they don't get any suplimental pick. Next is the team with the third worst record in 2008 and so on...................Suplimental picks are given in order of a teams record; with the worst teams being able to use their suplimental picks first.

I hope that helps.



Pretty much, with one catch: it's not necessarily highly-priced guys, but players rated highly by the Elias system. Thus, you get some oddities, like the Jays getting a sup. pick (our starter Tuesday night, coincidentally) in exchange for Justin Speier (who was acquired for the guy we faced two days ago...fun little circle, that). Or the Mets picking up a pick when 41 year old Roberto Hernandez flew the coop, only to bomb and retire a year later. When you're talking about relievers, middle infielders, and catchers, the compensation scheme gets really wacky owing to relative player values, or often sheer luck in the case of relievers, which is why they've looked at the sign-and-trade model.

Schad you have an error there...Mondays game is May 4th :P


Heh, corrected. Give me a break, I'm lucky if I know what month it is. Or who I am.
Image
**** your asterisk.
User avatar
TR50
General Manager
Posts: 7,555
And1: 1,222
Joined: Dec 19, 2004
       

Re: Series Thread: Jays vs. Indians, May 4-5 

Post#13 » by TR50 » Mon May 4, 2009 5:16 am

Schadenfreude wrote:
MjJunkYard wrote:
toronto_raptors50 wrote:i was bored and just looking at the Jays home-grown players and saw McGowan and someone else were 'Supplemental Picks'....what exactly is a Supplemental pick? I know what a Rule 5 draft pick is but not this, is it picks you get when your Type A/B players sign elsewhere?


A suplimental pick is compensation for losing a HIGH PRICED free agent. (I.E. The Blue Jays lost A.J. Burnett, so they will be given one suplimental pick in the 2009 draft).

Suplimental draft picks are given after round 1 is complete in the draft. Say the Washington Nationals had the worst record in baseball last year and lost three Type 1 free agents (high priced), they would get 3 additional draft picks after round one is complete. The next worst team in baseball Kansas City didn't lose any Type 1 Free Agents, so they don't get any suplimental pick. Next is the team with the third worst record in 2008 and so on...................Suplimental picks are given in order of a teams record; with the worst teams being able to use their suplimental picks first.

I hope that helps.



Pretty much, with one catch: it's not necessarily highly-priced guys, but players rated highly by the Elias system. Thus, you get some oddities, like the Jays getting a sup. pick (our starter Tuesday night, coincidentally) in exchange for Justin Speier (who was acquired for the guy we faced two days ago...fun little circle, that). Or the Mets picking up a pick when 41 year old Roberto Hernandez flew the coop, only to bomb and retire a year later. When you're talking about relievers, middle infielders, and catchers, the compensation scheme gets really wacky owing to relative player values, or often sheer luck in the case of relievers, which is why they've looked at the sign-and-trade model.

Schad you have an error there...Mondays game is May 4th :P


Heh, corrected. Give me a break, I'm lucky if I know what month it is. Or who I am.


yep those explanations were awesome and cleared it up.

and Schad, you have some leeway but if the Jays have any chance to maintain this star, we gotta play on the ride days :P
The Flying Gent
Veteran
Posts: 2,562
And1: 1,275
Joined: May 29, 2008
Contact:
         

Re: Series Thread: Jays vs. Indians, May 4-5 

Post#14 » by The Flying Gent » Mon May 4, 2009 5:59 am

Cecil's only good start so far this year was his last one. Hopefully he can keep it up, and hopefully the mystery mustache can just forget that Royals game all together.
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,572
And1: 18,058
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: Series Thread: Jays vs. Indians, May 4-5 

Post#15 » by Schad » Mon May 4, 2009 6:10 am

One other oddity to throw out there with the comp. picks. The Yankees, of course, signed three type A free agents: Teixeira, Sabathia, and Burnett. They give up their first rounder for Teixeira, second for Sabathia, and third for Burnett, with all three teams also receiving supplemental round picks. However, because the Yankees didn't sign Gerrit Cole last year (their first round pick), they still get a first rounder, as that one can't be conveyed to another team.
Image
**** your asterisk.
Kosta
RealGM
Posts: 16,353
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 03, 2006

Re: Series Thread: Jays vs. Indians, May 4-5 

Post#16 » by Kosta » Mon May 4, 2009 6:32 am

Schad for MVP. Nice write ups the last two series with the pitching match-ups.

I don't have a great feeling about these next two games against the tribe, but the Jays keep surprising me. 20-9 would be an incredible start.
Mike Hunt
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,769
And1: 37
Joined: Apr 11, 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Re: Series Thread: Jays vs. Indians, May 4-5 

Post#17 » by Mike Hunt » Mon May 4, 2009 3:53 pm

I just hope whoever's behind the plate calls a better game than Barajas did last time... "0-2, let's throw a fastball on the inner half of the plate". Tallet doesn't have great stuff but he does have enough stuff to get guys out. Unfortunately, the 89MPH fastball alone isn't enough.
User avatar
chargerxthirty
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,635
And1: 795
Joined: Feb 14, 2008
Location: Toronto
       

Re: Series Thread: Jays vs. Indians, May 4-5 

Post#18 » by chargerxthirty » Mon May 4, 2009 5:02 pm

2 game sweep.

If it's not, Brian Tallet must die.
User avatar
Forza Barca
Senior
Posts: 502
And1: 472
Joined: Jan 01, 2006
     

Re: Series Thread: Jays vs. Indians, May 4-5 

Post#19 » by Forza Barca » Mon May 4, 2009 5:18 pm

Hope Tallet redeems himself. We need to sweep the Tribe ... they are just not a good team this year.
Kawhi Da Goat

Image
spykelee
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,111
And1: 3,000
Joined: Sep 14, 2005
Location: Toronto
   

Re: Series Thread: Jays vs. Indians, May 4-5 

Post#20 » by spykelee » Mon May 4, 2009 9:24 pm

watchin the jays take batting practice right now... gotta say that V-dub looks dialed in. Hopefully for once he can make me look good :)

Return to Toronto Blue Jays