Page 1 of 1
MLB's Top 50 Prospects (2 Jays)
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:43 pm
by youngLion
LinkThey slotted Wallace at 16, with Drabek right behind him at 17. Has Snider's stock really fallen that much?
Re: MLB's Top 50 Prospects (2 Jays, no Snider)
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:45 pm
by OldNo7
I think he has too many MLB at bats to be considered a prospect still.
Re: MLB's Top 50 Prospects (2 Jays, no Snider)
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:48 pm
by Kaizen
That has to be it.
Re: MLB's Top 50 Prospects (2 Jays, no Snider)
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 11:13 pm
by evilRyu
shows the lack of "prospects" in the Jays farm system.. it took a HOF pitcher to do so!
Re: MLB's Top 50 Prospects
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 1:03 am
by youngLion
OldNo7 wrote:I think he has too many MLB at bats to be considered a prospect still.
Yeah I think you guys must be right. None of the guys on that list has any significant service time.
Re: MLB's Top 50 Prospects (2 Jays)
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:19 am
by LBJSeizedMyID
Usually the qualifications are something along the lines of this:
Hitters must have 100 or fewer Major League ABs
Starting pitchers must have 50 or fewer Major League innings
Relief pitchers must have 20 or fewer Major League innings
Re: MLB's Top 50 Prospects (2 Jays)
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:31 pm
by Morris_Shatford
I thought Ian Stewart was considered the better pitching prospect?
Re: MLB's Top 50 Prospects (2 Jays)
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 7:37 pm
by Kaizen
Zack Stewart and only one site had him close to Drabek. I still think Drabek was higher too.
Re: MLB's Top 50 Prospects (2 Jays)
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 9:36 pm
by Relentless88
Interesting to note that Wallace is at 16 and Michael Taylor (who we traded for him) is at 35.
Wallace is more MLB ready though.