No contracts tendered to MacDougal, Olsen
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 3:27 pm
By the deadline last night.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 02675.html
To me this is a bad move. The Nationals haven't signed anybody yet to replace Olsen, although its presumed that they will. Brian Bruney is a good acquistion, but its not like he's a guaranteed good closer or the one guy that instantly turns the bullpen from bad to good.
These guys would have gotten 5-6 million between them. When you're payroll is in the 40's, why not offer them and go to arby? As wild as MacDougal is, he saved 20 out of 21 last year and helped to solidify the bullpen. Olsen had a terrible year but certainly could rebound and pitch like 2008.
The article says the Nats "spared themselves from committing several million dollars to a pair with injury concerns."
Big deal, they would have been one year contracts at a risk of about 6 million dollars combined.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 02675.html
To me this is a bad move. The Nationals haven't signed anybody yet to replace Olsen, although its presumed that they will. Brian Bruney is a good acquistion, but its not like he's a guaranteed good closer or the one guy that instantly turns the bullpen from bad to good.
These guys would have gotten 5-6 million between them. When you're payroll is in the 40's, why not offer them and go to arby? As wild as MacDougal is, he saved 20 out of 21 last year and helped to solidify the bullpen. Olsen had a terrible year but certainly could rebound and pitch like 2008.
The article says the Nats "spared themselves from committing several million dollars to a pair with injury concerns."
Big deal, they would have been one year contracts at a risk of about 6 million dollars combined.