vincecarter4pres wrote:Dude, I would put a thousand dollars up to say the Nuggets don't win more then 42 games next year and miss the playoffs.
Good luck with that, although you should be careful, considering you are on this board pumping up a team that has not won 42 games in the last 2 years combined.
vincecarter4pres wrote:Denver has plenty of young talent and all of it is basically role players and fringe starters.
Funny they seem to have plenty of interest around the league, the Nuggets are not the Nets, the Nuggets have legitimate starters at 4 slots next year, and will fill the 5 easily with their cap room. It could be argued the Nets and several other teams that think they are the better option for Nene, do not have more then 2 legit starters.
vincecarter4pres wrote:You have no franchise player, no star and the only prospect on your team that has that potential is Gallo and I still doubt he ever gets to that level.
Yet they somehow managed to win 50 games last years, no star and no other prospects then the guy who was fighting injuries directly after the trade, I guess they are in line for 70 wins next year when Gallo is healthy? by the way since you spent so little time watching the Nuggets as your opinions in this very thread prove, you should know that Gallo was at best the 4th best player on the court for the Nuggets.
vincecarter4pres wrote:Stop fooling yourself, there isn't a snowball chance in a microwave that Denver "chose" the NY package, they settled for it cause Melo just wasn't going to go to NJ as they were built.
go back and read some of the quotes from Melo even after the deal, he thought he was going to New Jersey the night before the deal. But he refused to go?
vincecarter4pres wrote:NY got it out the way cause things change. Say they say **** it and let Melo hit free agency and then the Nets wind up with Deron and the cap to sign him, he very well may have chosen the Nets.
Except the Knicks did the deal because otherwise he was going to the Nets, which has been confirmed by plenty of article both directly before and after the deal. The Knicks did not give up that package for the hell of it, and to say they did just shows complete ignorance, no team would give up what the Knicks offered for a guy who made it clear they were his 1st choice.
vincecarter4pres wrote:That NJ package blew the Knicks package out of the water with an atomic bomb, they aren't in the same stratosphere.
What package 4 draft picks, a young raw PF prospect, an overpaid injury prone average pg, and cap relief. the Nuggets got 5 prospects, an average pg, 3 picks, a pick swap, cap relief. Deals are damn close, and obviously the Nuggets decided they would rather win now as opposed to going through a complete rebuild.
vincecarter4pres wrote:I love the dig at the end too. Something I should know about. Yeah cause the Nuggets have been a real model of success themselves.
the Nuggets had a bad run throughout the 90s, but have had 18 winning seasons since joining the NBA, the Nets have had 11 winning seasons since joining the NBA, so yes the Nuggets franchise has had more success.
vincecarter4pres wrote:There is no way in hell the Nuggets are a better team without Melo, they just caught lightening in a bottle and were ahead of the curve as was when the trade went down.
It is up for debate if the Nuggets are better without Melo, funny thing is their offense ran smoother, their defense was tons better, and they played hard. I would never say they were more talented, but the iso offense, and lackadaisical defense from Melo did as much to hurt the Nuggets as his talent helped them. Every observer who watched both teams say the Nuggets after the trade were a much better team then they had been with melo.
vincecarter4pres wrote:If you resign basically everyone, I think you're looking at 38 wins next year.
Once again with the projections, considering your lack of knowledge with the Nuggets, i would say we should all take this with a grain of salt.
vincecarter4pres wrote:And what good does cap space do when every dime of it will go to resigning the guys already on your roster?
You realize the Nuggets have plenty of cap space to resign all their guys, and still have the largest TPE in the history of the league, they have plenty of ways to add to the team.
vincecarter4pres wrote:And how are you not a treadmill team even if you remain a 50 win squad?
Young team winning 50 games a season is not a treadmill team, I love how every player in the league has the chance to get better, but the young guys on the Nuggets are fringe starters and have no chance to get better.
vincecarter4pres wrote:You have no real way to get significantly better, you're topped out as a 2nd round team if everything goes "right".
have you ever heard of players improving? What about draft picks and the MLE? Trades using TPEs? The Nuggets have plenty of young talent that likely will get better, and plenty of other options to add good young talent. it is not like they went out and spent all their money on 3rd stringers and busts. they got 3 starters and a 6th man all from teams that were on pace to win 50 games last year, and won 50 games with those players and their own young talent.
vincecarter4pres wrote:What's wrong with what Cleveland wound up with? They did things the right way, they didn't disillusion themselves with happy thoughts of the playoffs, they sucked and sucked hard and will suck for another season or two and will build through the draft and trade, land 1 if not 2 franchise stars in this fashion and be a force again within 5 or 6 years and probably in the playoffs in another 2 or 3.
You realize that the odds are the Cavs get one starter out of their 2 lotto picks right? you obviously believe a ton more in draft picks then I do, or then the results bare out in the end. Draft picks are nice, but they can lead to a decade of futility, believe me as a Nuggets fan I Know. by the way how are they going to land a franchise player? they do not have the trade pieces, and are depending on the draft, considering the odds it can be a damn long wait. To proclaim them to have a better future shows lack of understanding how teams are built in the NBA. For every team like the Thunder, there are 2 like the the Cavs, Clippers, Knicks, and Bulls. they go a decade between good teams hoping to get lucky one time in the draft.
vincecarter4pres wrote:I mean you can't possibly believe your team as is, is a contender or will be shortly without a MAJOR move, do you?
Did you see the Mavs as a contender last year? the Nuggets are a good 50 win team, with plenty of depth and young talent, as well as the draft picks, TPe, and cap space to make any trade they come across, and still leave themselves in a position to entice a star into staying in Denver. They are not some team that struggled to win a game after trading Melo, but instead improved dramatically. You come on here acting as if the Nets and Cavs are in a position to do anything more then the Nuggets right, now the Cavs have limited trade assets and nothing to entice a player to stay, and the Nets gave up all their trade chips to get one star, and now have little ability to improve the team around him enough to entice him to stay. Nuggets have all the tools to continue to win 50 games, and as long as the front office continues to make good moves they are much closer to being a contender then the Cavs, or Nets, or any other young rebuilding team right now.