ImageImageImage

How much patience do the Nuggets deserve

Moderator: THE J0KER

The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: How much patience do the Nuggets deserve 

Post#21 » by The Rebel » Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:09 pm

patrol345 wrote:So you feel one of the youngest teams in the league is not gonna get better? And mind you they pushed the lakers to 7 games in the playoffs this year so if you do think they are going to get better that should mean making it to the second round of the playoffs or maybe further next year. No one is giving them a chance because of the nuggets lack of success for the past ten years but I'm arguing that lack of success has nothing to do with our current group of young players. All I hear on here is trade trade trade.I think they will surprise everyone next year and be a 2 thru 4 seed and at the least make it too the second round of the playoffs.

Oh wow they got to game 7 against a team that was run out of the building in the 2nd round, that just proves how good they are. Which means they were not as good as the Lakers, who weren't anywhere close to as good as the Thunder, but let's all pat them on the back because there is always next year, where they still will not be as good as the Thunder, probably not as good as the Spurs, still not as good as the Lakers, and not even close to the Heat.

Also where did I say that anybody on the Nuggets can not get better? I have been very clear in saying they can all get better, but to take a big jump after 3 years in the league rarely happens. Meaning guys like Gallo who has been in the league and a starter for 4 years is not going to suddenly turn into an elite guy his 5th year. Lawson is not going to suddenly turn into a superstar his 4th year after not even being all star caliber for his 1st 3, Faried has the best chance to really turn into something, but he needs to learn some skills outside of rebounding and finishing.

You are right this team is different from the one 3 years ago, but it is not much different from the one 2 years ago, and is no different from the one last year. Not to mention they have the same coach, the same philosophy coming out of the ownership box, and the same avoidance on spending money. So how does a team magically get better, or is it just you hoping it will, because I would love to hear about some 4 year starters that suddenly jumped up from above average to elite in one year.
The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: How much patience do the Nuggets deserve 

Post#22 » by The Rebel » Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:14 pm

Powder Blue wrote:
As far as running out of patience, I suppose one who's tired of the first round exits could stop watching the team but that isn't going to change the way the team does business. Kroenke's aren't going to change the way they run the team.

I wish it was as easy as not watching the team for me, one of my first memories of life is waiting outside of Mcnichols to get Dan Issel and George Mcginnis's autographs as a child. I have been a Nuggets fan long before the Kroenke's took over, and I will be one long after they sale the team. Instead I am going to come on a message board and bitch, and hope one day the realize that maybe just maybe some of us are right.
User avatar
sportsmikegm23
Pro Prospect
Posts: 895
And1: 0
Joined: May 11, 2007

Re: How much patience do the Nuggets deserve 

Post#23 » by sportsmikegm23 » Tue Jul 10, 2012 4:06 pm

The Rebel wrote:
Powder Blue wrote:
As far as running out of patience, I suppose one who's tired of the first round exits could stop watching the team but that isn't going to change the way the team does business. Kroenke's aren't going to change the way they run the team.

I wish it was as easy as not watching the team for me, one of my first memories of life is waiting outside of Mcnichols to get Dan Issel and George Mcginnis's autographs as a child. I have been a Nuggets fan long before the Kroenke's took over, and I will be one long after they sale the team. Instead I am going to come on a message board and bitch, and hope one day the realize that maybe just maybe some of us are right.


+1

You are absolutely right, this is the place where we as fans can bitch about the organization, players, etc... It's the only way to feel better :)
Powder Blue
Analyst
Posts: 3,444
And1: 642
Joined: Dec 28, 2004
   

Re: How much patience do the Nuggets deserve 

Post#24 » by Powder Blue » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:23 am

I feel ya, good to get it out every now and then....I've bitched about something every april since 04 on this board.
User avatar
benjamins
Sophomore
Posts: 152
And1: 62
Joined: Apr 29, 2011
Location: McGee's blockparty
 

Re: How much patience do the Nuggets deserve 

Post#25 » by benjamins » Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:56 pm

The word treadmill comes to mind. It seems like Denver is comparable to the Pacers, both seem to be great teams but with no real championship goal. We have built around youth but with no real star our championship window is closed. We can't simply live off the reputation of being 'young', or having 'potential', that potential much achieve something - it must go somewhere, we can't be young and up and coming forever. When I look at our squad, I think that we aren't a bad team and we CAN make a run for the WCF if we get lucky, but is it worth it? Shouldn't we look to sign big free agents, draft big time players? Isn't that every tradmill teams objective?
Image
manchambo
Starter
Posts: 2,314
And1: 836
Joined: Nov 12, 2004

Re: How much patience do the Nuggets deserve 

Post#26 » by manchambo » Mon Jul 16, 2012 7:28 pm

The problem with the premise of this question is that it assumes a continuity in what the team is doing/how it is constructed that doesn't exist.

During the last 9 years the team "pushed the chips in" twice, first with KMart, Iverson and Camby, then with Billups et al. The first was completely unsuccessful in terms of championship potential and the second came very close in one year then fizzled out. If the team was still trying to win a championship with one of those general architectures then, of course, there wouldn't be any reason for patience.

Now there's a new iteration that showed some very nice promise last year. I don't think the evaluation of this team has the first thing to do with what happened 9 years ago. This team has to be evaluated on its own merits, not on the fact that a totally different team lost in the first round 9 years ago. My answer is that the current team deserves some patience, as it is a nice assembly of young talent that seems to have potential for growth.
patrol345
Junior
Posts: 388
And1: 21
Joined: Jul 26, 2010

Re: How much patience do the Nuggets deserve 

Post#27 » by patrol345 » Tue Jul 17, 2012 12:15 am

The Rebel wrote:
patrol345 wrote:So you feel one of the youngest teams in the league is not gonna get better? And mind you they pushed the lakers to 7 games in the playoffs this year so if you do think they are going to get better that should mean making it to the second round of the playoffs or maybe further next year. No one is giving them a chance because of the nuggets lack of success for the past ten years but I'm arguing that lack of success has nothing to do with our current group of young players. All I hear on here is trade trade trade.I think they will surprise everyone next year and be a 2 thru 4 seed and at the least make it too the second round of the playoffs.

Oh wow they got to game 7 against a team that was run out of the building in the 2nd round, that just proves how good they are. Which means they were not as good as the Lakers, who weren't anywhere close to as good as the Thunder, but let's all pat them on the back because there is always next year, where they still will not be as good as the Thunder, probably not as good as the Spurs, still not as good as the Lakers, and not even close to the Heat.

Also where did I say that anybody on the Nuggets can not get better? I have been very clear in saying they can all get better, but to take a big jump after 3 years in the league rarely happens. Meaning guys like Gallo who has been in the league and a starter for 4 years is not going to suddenly turn into an elite guy his 5th year. Lawson is not going to suddenly turn into a superstar his 4th year after not even being all star caliber for his 1st 3, Faried has the best chance to really turn into something, but he needs to learn some skills outside of rebounding and finishing.

You are right this team is different from the one 3 years ago, but it is not much different from the one 2 years ago, and is no different from the one last year. Not to mention they have the same coach, the same philosophy coming out of the ownership box, and the same avoidance on spending money. So how does a team magically get better, or is it just you hoping it will, because I would love to hear about some 4 year starters that suddenly jumped up from above average to elite in one year.


Chris paul averaged 17 and 7 his first full year as a starter. Lawson just averaged 16 and 6 his first full year as a starter with a good showing in the playoffs. Is it his fault he had billiups in front of him his first year and a half? Nope. But you can't develop your talent so slowly and then suddenly as fans become upset because there's no "star" on the team. Lol what do you guys expect. Look how long it took faried to get meaning full playing time. If it were up to karl we would still be talking about how soft nene is and how bad mozgov sucks, and faried would of been rotting away on the bench, but he got some time and now a bug is in fans ears of how good the kid is, some say he may of been rookie of the year if he got playing time right away or atleast had a shot at it, you don't think that's a good start to becoming a superstar? that's how you get allstar votes anyways right ? I'm sorry but Ill take youth and player development over trading for another whiney melo type player any day.
Grape God
Banned User
Posts: 375
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 11, 2012

Re: How much patience do the Nuggets deserve 

Post#28 » by Grape God » Tue Jul 17, 2012 3:42 am

patrol345 wrote:
The Rebel wrote:
patrol345 wrote:So you feel one of the youngest teams in the league is not gonna get better? And mind you they pushed the lakers to 7 games in the playoffs this year so if you do think they are going to get better that should mean making it to the second round of the playoffs or maybe further next year. No one is giving them a chance because of the nuggets lack of success for the past ten years but I'm arguing that lack of success has nothing to do with our current group of young players. All I hear on here is trade trade trade.I think they will surprise everyone next year and be a 2 thru 4 seed and at the least make it too the second round of the playoffs.

Oh wow they got to game 7 against a team that was run out of the building in the 2nd round, that just proves how good they are. Which means they were not as good as the Lakers, who weren't anywhere close to as good as the Thunder, but let's all pat them on the back because there is always next year, where they still will not be as good as the Thunder, probably not as good as the Spurs, still not as good as the Lakers, and not even close to the Heat.

Also where did I say that anybody on the Nuggets can not get better? I have been very clear in saying they can all get better, but to take a big jump after 3 years in the league rarely happens. Meaning guys like Gallo who has been in the league and a starter for 4 years is not going to suddenly turn into an elite guy his 5th year. Lawson is not going to suddenly turn into a superstar his 4th year after not even being all star caliber for his 1st 3, Faried has the best chance to really turn into something, but he needs to learn some skills outside of rebounding and finishing.

You are right this team is different from the one 3 years ago, but it is not much different from the one 2 years ago, and is no different from the one last year. Not to mention they have the same coach, the same philosophy coming out of the ownership box, and the same avoidance on spending money. So how does a team magically get better, or is it just you hoping it will, because I would love to hear about some 4 year starters that suddenly jumped up from above average to elite in one year.


Chris paul averaged 17 and 7 his first full year as a starter. Lawson just averaged 16 and 6 his first full year as a starter with a good showing in the playoffs. Is it his fault he had billiups in front of him his first year and a half? Nope. But you can't develop your talent so slowly and then suddenly as fans become upset because there's no "star" on the team. Lol what do you guys expect. Look how long it took faried to get meaning full playing time. If it were up to karl we would still be talking about how soft nene is and how bad mozgov sucks, and faried would of been rotting away on the bench, but he got some time and now a bug is in fans ears of how good the kid is, some say he may of been rookie of the year if he got playing time right away or atleast had a shot at it, you don't think that's a good start to becoming a superstar? that's how you get allstar votes anyways right ? I'm sorry but Ill take youth and player development over trading for another whiney melo type player any day.


Which season did he average 17 & 7? I dont see it. he avged 7.8 his rookie season and that was his lowest output. When he was 24 he averaged 10.7 ast and 18.7 pts. At 24 years of age, Lawson averaged 16.4 and 6.6. Lawson isn't going to suddenly become CP3. I think age is usually the most important factor, but I agree lawson can make a serious jump. he still has untapped potential, maybe because of C-bills/DRE, but moreso because he can be so passive/ withdrawn at times. If Karl and his staff can turn lawson into a aggressive player he can be elite. He already is unstoppable when he is on. His mindset is what has held back his development more recently.

Now, this may be unrealistic but I am going to predict Lawson's stat line next year.
This past year: Season,Age,Tm,Lg,G,GS,MP,FG,FGA,FG%,3P,3PA,3P%,FT,FTA,FT%,ORB,DRB,TRB,AST,STL,BLK,TOV,PF,PTS
2011-12,24,DEN,NBA,61,61,34.8,6.1,12.6,.488,1.2,3.3,.365,2.9,3.5,.824,0.9,2.8,3.7,6.6,1.3,0.1,2.4,1.5,16.4


first, I think he will take more shots. lets say 14.5 fga. I think he will take considerably more threes. Lets say 4.5. I think he will hit at a 40% clip. Overall he will score between 19-22 ppg. Assists may go down to 6. His FG% will be 50%+ this year. everything else should remain similar.

That's elite IMO.
patrol345
Junior
Posts: 388
And1: 21
Joined: Jul 26, 2010

Re: How much patience do the Nuggets deserve 

Post#29 » by patrol345 » Tue Jul 17, 2012 11:52 am

Cp3 averaged 16 points 7 assist in 05 to 06 and 17 and 8 in 06 to 07 I was off on his points his rookie year I guess. Is what I got from http://espn.go.com/nba/player/stats/_/i ... chris-paul. Paul also was averaging 35 to 36 minutes a night. Lawson just got those minutes this past season. I'm not saying lawson is cp3 but I'm saying they are comparable given the same playing time. Yes lawson is 24 but he's also been brought along a lot slower than paul who was handed 35 minutes a night his rookie season. And then fans bitch and say he's 24 so he won't ever be elite or its his fourth year and he hasn't been an all star. Heck how was he supposed to be he's been behind billups for 2 years of his career. That was my point in the post above.
No-Man
RealGM
Posts: 14,879
And1: 3,480
Joined: Feb 11, 2012

Re: How much patience do the Nuggets deserve 

Post#30 » by No-Man » Wed Jul 18, 2012 2:56 am

With the deals you have, you need to upgrade the starting PF with an All Star, and by dealing something like, Fournier/Hamilton, Chandler, Faried and Mozgov, that could happen.

The question is who you target.

Return to Denver Nuggets