ImageImageImage

Wilson Chandlers future?

Moderator: THE J0KER

User avatar
City of Trees
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,851
And1: 5,511
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: Wilson Chandlers future? 

Post#41 » by City of Trees » Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:27 pm

Then how about this since some of you had interest in Brooks:


ATL Trades
Teague
2013 1st (top 10 protected)


ATL Receives
Tyreke Evans

Why? With the addition of Harris and Williams- Teague is expendable. Evans is a young stud who is a potential lock down defender and can get to the rim at will. Evans will replace Johnson at the 2 for many years to come.



Den Trades
Wilson Chandler


Den Receives
Jeff Teague
Travis Outlaw

Why? Denver needs another point guard to pair with Lawson. Teague is a young up and coming player that should fit in well with Denver.



Sac Trades
Evans
Outlaw


Sac Receives
Chandler
ALT 2013 1st (top 10 protected)

Why? Evans is fit to play SG but the Kings like Thornton. Chandler is the type of player the Kings need at SF. Late 1st levels out the value for Evans.
The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: Wilson Chandlers future? 

Post#42 » by The Rebel » Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:26 pm

Jeff Teague and Travis Outlaw are considerably different then tyreke Evans. In case you missed it the Nuggets just resigned andre Miller for 3 years, and have plenty of sfs, not to mention the value sucks ass for the Nuggets.
gensu3k1
Senior
Posts: 728
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 22, 2003

Re: Wilson Chandlers future? 

Post#43 » by gensu3k1 » Fri Jul 20, 2012 9:16 pm

If Wilson Chandler was traded individually I'd guess it would be for a draft pick +filler. Nuggets already have so much depth that I'd imagine Ujiri doesn't want to just have the same problem. More likely they are going to try to do a 3 for 1.
Zach Randolph + Kevin Durant >>>>>>> Greg Oden. Bob Whitsitt>>>>>> Kevin Pritchard.
"Jan Vesely, this guy can really shoot it." --Jay Bilas, 2011
patrol345
Junior
Posts: 388
And1: 21
Joined: Jul 26, 2010

Re: Wilson Chandlers future? 

Post#44 » by patrol345 » Sat Jul 21, 2012 2:59 am

I would be down for a chandler for evans trade maybe mozgov,chandler, 2 first for evans. But for one like rebel said I would be hesitant for him to start due to his lack of a 3 point shot and how bad teams pack the paint on us, and if he could accept coming off the bench. If he could shoot better I could see him taking aa's spot as he has hugh upside. Its really a 2 for 1 deal I would be all about.

Can u imagine a second unit of dre,evans,jham, randolph(or al), koufus that's a heck of a second unit. And if he shoots better it could make aa move able.
The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: Wilson Chandlers future? 

Post#45 » by The Rebel » Sat Jul 21, 2012 3:13 am

patrol345 wrote:I would be down for a chandler for evans trade maybe mozgov,chandler, 2 first for evans. But for one like rebel said I would be hesitant for him to start due to his lack of a 3 point shot and how bad teams pack the paint on us, and if he could accept coming off the bench. If he could shoot better I could see him taking aa's spot as he has hugh upside. Its really a 2 for 1 deal I would be all about.

Can u imagine a second unit of dre,evans,jham, randolph(or al), koufus that's a heck of a second unit. And if he shoots better it could make aa move able.


I would not give that much for Evans, maybe chandler, Mozgov, and a protected 1st, but no way in hell am I giving up more then that for a guy who's present team does not even want to talk about an extension.
patrol345
Junior
Posts: 388
And1: 21
Joined: Jul 26, 2010

Re: Wilson Chandlers future? 

Post#46 » by patrol345 » Sat Jul 21, 2012 3:35 am

I'm fine with using our 2013 in a trade this year especially in a 2 for 1 and a pick. Heck as long as it will take fournier and miller too see the court I don't see the need for it. I'd even be fine with moving it for a 2014 pick so we have 3 that year and can move up some.
The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: Wilson Chandlers future? 

Post#47 » by The Rebel » Mon Jul 30, 2012 5:58 pm

Interesting article and analysis on wilson Chandler starting
http://www.prosportsblogging.com/2012/0 ... in-denver/
DaFan334
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,919
And1: 1,466
Joined: Jul 21, 2006

Re: Wilson Chandlers future? 

Post#48 » by DaFan334 » Tue Jul 31, 2012 6:25 am

I'm not too sold on that idea. I feel like Miller is the playmaker that makes the second unit run well and Gallo wouldn't be able to use his playmaking skills as much as he can while playing with Ty more so because of Tys ability to work off ball and use his speed.
Image
The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: Wilson Chandlers future? 

Post#49 » by The Rebel » Tue Jul 31, 2012 2:40 pm

DaFan334 wrote:I'm not too sold on that idea. I feel like Miller is the playmaker that makes the second unit run well and Gallo wouldn't be able to use his playmaking skills as much as he can while playing with Ty more so because of Tys ability to work off ball and use his speed.


I agree, Gallo is better with the ball in his hands more and needs some room to operate, both of which he will get out there with the starters. I also do not understand how the guy talks about defense being a priority but assumes that McGee will start, considering McGee was not starting last season, I do not see him starting this season, instead I am sure we will start the season with Mozgov being the starter for defensive purposes. but it is interesting to read, and shows that there are some reasons to believe that Chandler is severely underrated when an article can be written based on Chandler starting over Gallo.
DaFan334
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,919
And1: 1,466
Joined: Jul 21, 2006

Re: Wilson Chandlers future? 

Post#50 » by DaFan334 » Tue Jul 31, 2012 7:28 pm

Yeah, Chandler has a lot of talent to be coming off the bench, along with the majority of the rest of our bench. I'm not sure there is another team in the league with as good of a bench honestly. Wilson should get a lot of Al's minutes to start the year with him out.

As for McGee, I only think he was coming off the bench last year because he wasn't around all year to fit into the system as well and his natural ability fit in more easily with the second team. I don't think that will be the case this year after we gave him a good contract and he will have a full training camp to fit in with the team. I see him earning a starting job to start the season, especially if he make strides while working with Hakeem Olajuwon. But who knows, Mozgov or Koufus could also make valuable strides from working with Hakeem and find their way into the starting lineup come fall. I'm really glad the team is sending those 3 and Faried there. They all have a lot of potential and he seems to be a great teacher for bigs.

Return to Denver Nuggets