Then how about this since some of you had interest in Brooks:
ATL Trades
Teague
2013 1st (top 10 protected)
ATL Receives
Tyreke Evans
Why? With the addition of Harris and Williams- Teague is expendable. Evans is a young stud who is a potential lock down defender and can get to the rim at will. Evans will replace Johnson at the 2 for many years to come.
Den Trades
Wilson Chandler
Den Receives
Jeff Teague
Travis Outlaw
Why? Denver needs another point guard to pair with Lawson. Teague is a young up and coming player that should fit in well with Denver.
Sac Trades
Evans
Outlaw
Sac Receives
Chandler
ALT 2013 1st (top 10 protected)
Why? Evans is fit to play SG but the Kings like Thornton. Chandler is the type of player the Kings need at SF. Late 1st levels out the value for Evans.
Wilson Chandlers future?
Moderator: THE J0KER
Re: Wilson Chandlers future?
- City of Trees
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 15,851
- And1: 5,511
- Joined: Dec 23, 2009
- Location: Roseville, CA
-
Re: Wilson Chandlers future?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 25,186
- And1: 11,359
- Joined: Mar 05, 2005
-
Re: Wilson Chandlers future?
Jeff Teague and Travis Outlaw are considerably different then tyreke Evans. In case you missed it the Nuggets just resigned andre Miller for 3 years, and have plenty of sfs, not to mention the value sucks ass for the Nuggets.
Re: Wilson Chandlers future?
-
- Senior
- Posts: 728
- And1: 2
- Joined: Jun 22, 2003
Re: Wilson Chandlers future?
If Wilson Chandler was traded individually I'd guess it would be for a draft pick +filler. Nuggets already have so much depth that I'd imagine Ujiri doesn't want to just have the same problem. More likely they are going to try to do a 3 for 1.
Zach Randolph + Kevin Durant >>>>>>> Greg Oden. Bob Whitsitt>>>>>> Kevin Pritchard.
"Jan Vesely, this guy can really shoot it." --Jay Bilas, 2011
"Jan Vesely, this guy can really shoot it." --Jay Bilas, 2011
Re: Wilson Chandlers future?
-
- Junior
- Posts: 388
- And1: 21
- Joined: Jul 26, 2010
Re: Wilson Chandlers future?
I would be down for a chandler for evans trade maybe mozgov,chandler, 2 first for evans. But for one like rebel said I would be hesitant for him to start due to his lack of a 3 point shot and how bad teams pack the paint on us, and if he could accept coming off the bench. If he could shoot better I could see him taking aa's spot as he has hugh upside. Its really a 2 for 1 deal I would be all about.
Can u imagine a second unit of dre,evans,jham, randolph(or al), koufus that's a heck of a second unit. And if he shoots better it could make aa move able.
Can u imagine a second unit of dre,evans,jham, randolph(or al), koufus that's a heck of a second unit. And if he shoots better it could make aa move able.
Re: Wilson Chandlers future?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 25,186
- And1: 11,359
- Joined: Mar 05, 2005
-
Re: Wilson Chandlers future?
patrol345 wrote:I would be down for a chandler for evans trade maybe mozgov,chandler, 2 first for evans. But for one like rebel said I would be hesitant for him to start due to his lack of a 3 point shot and how bad teams pack the paint on us, and if he could accept coming off the bench. If he could shoot better I could see him taking aa's spot as he has hugh upside. Its really a 2 for 1 deal I would be all about.
Can u imagine a second unit of dre,evans,jham, randolph(or al), koufus that's a heck of a second unit. And if he shoots better it could make aa move able.
I would not give that much for Evans, maybe chandler, Mozgov, and a protected 1st, but no way in hell am I giving up more then that for a guy who's present team does not even want to talk about an extension.
Re: Wilson Chandlers future?
-
- Junior
- Posts: 388
- And1: 21
- Joined: Jul 26, 2010
Re: Wilson Chandlers future?
I'm fine with using our 2013 in a trade this year especially in a 2 for 1 and a pick. Heck as long as it will take fournier and miller too see the court I don't see the need for it. I'd even be fine with moving it for a 2014 pick so we have 3 that year and can move up some.
Re: Wilson Chandlers future?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 25,186
- And1: 11,359
- Joined: Mar 05, 2005
-
Re: Wilson Chandlers future?
Interesting article and analysis on wilson Chandler starting
http://www.prosportsblogging.com/2012/0 ... in-denver/
http://www.prosportsblogging.com/2012/0 ... in-denver/
Re: Wilson Chandlers future?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,919
- And1: 1,466
- Joined: Jul 21, 2006
Re: Wilson Chandlers future?
I'm not too sold on that idea. I feel like Miller is the playmaker that makes the second unit run well and Gallo wouldn't be able to use his playmaking skills as much as he can while playing with Ty more so because of Tys ability to work off ball and use his speed.

Re: Wilson Chandlers future?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 25,186
- And1: 11,359
- Joined: Mar 05, 2005
-
Re: Wilson Chandlers future?
DaFan334 wrote:I'm not too sold on that idea. I feel like Miller is the playmaker that makes the second unit run well and Gallo wouldn't be able to use his playmaking skills as much as he can while playing with Ty more so because of Tys ability to work off ball and use his speed.
I agree, Gallo is better with the ball in his hands more and needs some room to operate, both of which he will get out there with the starters. I also do not understand how the guy talks about defense being a priority but assumes that McGee will start, considering McGee was not starting last season, I do not see him starting this season, instead I am sure we will start the season with Mozgov being the starter for defensive purposes. but it is interesting to read, and shows that there are some reasons to believe that Chandler is severely underrated when an article can be written based on Chandler starting over Gallo.
Re: Wilson Chandlers future?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,919
- And1: 1,466
- Joined: Jul 21, 2006
Re: Wilson Chandlers future?
Yeah, Chandler has a lot of talent to be coming off the bench, along with the majority of the rest of our bench. I'm not sure there is another team in the league with as good of a bench honestly. Wilson should get a lot of Al's minutes to start the year with him out.
As for McGee, I only think he was coming off the bench last year because he wasn't around all year to fit into the system as well and his natural ability fit in more easily with the second team. I don't think that will be the case this year after we gave him a good contract and he will have a full training camp to fit in with the team. I see him earning a starting job to start the season, especially if he make strides while working with Hakeem Olajuwon. But who knows, Mozgov or Koufus could also make valuable strides from working with Hakeem and find their way into the starting lineup come fall. I'm really glad the team is sending those 3 and Faried there. They all have a lot of potential and he seems to be a great teacher for bigs.
As for McGee, I only think he was coming off the bench last year because he wasn't around all year to fit into the system as well and his natural ability fit in more easily with the second team. I don't think that will be the case this year after we gave him a good contract and he will have a full training camp to fit in with the team. I see him earning a starting job to start the season, especially if he make strides while working with Hakeem Olajuwon. But who knows, Mozgov or Koufus could also make valuable strides from working with Hakeem and find their way into the starting lineup come fall. I'm really glad the team is sending those 3 and Faried there. They all have a lot of potential and he seems to be a great teacher for bigs.