ImageImageImage

Will Barton Thread

Moderator: THE J0KER

NuggetsWY
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,392
And1: 4,125
Joined: Oct 28, 2015
Location: Cheyenne, WY
 

Re: Will Barton Thread 

Post#41 » by NuggetsWY » Mon Feb 24, 2020 11:28 pm

Coeur wrote:I love Thrill Barton but want him off the bench. Right now is the right time to give MPJ the chance as a starter for 20 games and see if it works. Just focus the beginning of games a little more on Jamal Murray getting going

Murray
Craig
MPJ
Grant
Jokic

Harris, Barton, millsap, Plumlee off the bench

Barton gets minutes Murray is off =

I agree - I've said it before, Barton is best off the bench. Play him and if he's hot, let him play. If he's not hot, pull him and give him another try in the second half. We have the depth, so why not?

That works for now and better, it gives some bench players a chance to develop (read that as young players). That helps in the future and we can figure out if they are any good before we trade them or let them walk.

Consider where a few former Nuggets are.
Beasley & Hernangomez are the latest who are now starting and playing well although it's only been a few games.Chandler is doing well in New Jersey.
Gallinari is doing well in OKC.
Nurkic was doing well before his injury.
Lyles seems to be playing well now.

I'm not saying we should have kept all of those players, but ... that's six players that are either starting or playing plenty of minutes.
Coeur
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,805
And1: 669
Joined: Jan 18, 2016

Re: Will Barton Thread 

Post#42 » by Coeur » Mon Feb 24, 2020 11:41 pm

NuggetsWY wrote:
Coeur wrote:I love Thrill Barton but want him off the bench. Right now is the right time to give MPJ the chance as a starter for 20 games and see if it works. Just focus the beginning of games a little more on Jamal Murray getting going

Murray
Craig
MPJ
Grant
Jokic

Harris, Barton, millsap, Plumlee off the bench

Barton gets minutes Murray is off =

I agree - I've said it before, Barton is best off the bench. Play him and if he's hot, let him play. If he's not hot, pull him and give him another try in the second half. We have the depth, so why not?

That works for now and better, it gives some bench players a chance to develop (read that as young players). That helps in the future and we can figure out if they are any good before we trade them or let them walk.

Consider where a few former Nuggets are.
Beasley & Hernangomez are the latest who are now starting and playing well although it's only been a few games.Chandler is doing well in New Jersey.
Gallinari is doing well in OKC.
Nurkic was doing well before his injury.
Lyles seems to be playing well now.

I'm not saying we should have kept all of those players, but ... that's six players that are either starting or playing plenty of minutes.

And more than half of them were chased off from not having enough minutes. Too much depth is a thing. And Nugs have been negatively affected by it more than any team

Not maximizing or coming close to performance or trade value:

Beasley, Vanderbilt, hernangomez, NURKIC,


Who’s next to add to that list? Craig, Morris, KBD,


All trades players from Nugs get traded off undervalued because of not enough PT. I was fine w all the Harris Barton millsap starting and playing when it was to trade them. Now start putting the best out there. Those trade values are no worry. Go win

Murray/Barton
Craig/Harris
MPJ
Grant/millsap
Jokic/Plumlee
The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: Will Barton Thread 

Post#43 » by The Rebel » Tue Feb 25, 2020 1:51 am

NuggetsWY wrote:
Coeur wrote:I love Thrill Barton but want him off the bench. Right now is the right time to give MPJ the chance as a starter for 20 games and see if it works. Just focus the beginning of games a little more on Jamal Murray getting going

Murray
Craig
MPJ
Grant
Jokic

Harris, Barton, millsap, Plumlee off the bench

Barton gets minutes Murray is off =

I agree - I've said it before, Barton is best off the bench. Play him and if he's hot, let him play. If he's not hot, pull him and give him another try in the second half. We have the depth, so why not?

That works for now and better, it gives some bench players a chance to develop (read that as young players). That helps in the future and we can figure out if they are any good before we trade them or let them walk.

Consider where a few former Nuggets are.
Beasley & Hernangomez are the latest who are now starting and playing well although it's only been a few games.Chandler is doing well in New Jersey.
Gallinari is doing well in OKC.
Nurkic was doing well before his injury.
Lyles seems to be playing well now.

I'm not saying we should have kept all of those players, but ... that's six players that are either starting or playing plenty of minutes.


Part of the problem is that Barton is paid starter money, so they have to insist on starting him or they have to trade him. I think the real issue is that Barton was allowed to be a vocal leader on this team, you can tell he is arrogant and believes that he is a great player, and when the young guys were scared to shoot early in their careers Barton was the guy who loved to do it. If you follow that theory than you can see why Malone always played him a couple of years ago, and why they cannot call him for his **** now. When he was out last year Jokic and Murray grew up a lot as far as leadership, but even still they kind of look at him for leadership.


I love and hate Barton. Within a couple of weeks of getting here he was **** talking Corey Brewer, and you need some of that especially with a young team. That is the good part of Barton, a guy confident no matter what. The bad part of Barton is that he will make comments like he did last night, acting like it was not a big deal instead of taking responsibility. He wants to take over when he is on the court, partially from believing that the team needs that but also because that is who he is, even when he is having a terrible night. With him insisting on being a starter and I am sure that the front office and coaching staff agreed to make him the starter when he re-signed, he cannot be benched on this team. His attitude will kill the entire roster so he should have been moved.

As for the guys who have left
Gallo left for more money, the front office wanted to save the money with committing so much to Millsap, but I think they did not realize what they would have had with him. I think they underestimated how good Jokic really is, and how well they fit together.

Lyles is the only 3rd year guy who publicly came out to complain that they had long practices.

Chandler was always going to bitch if he wasn't a starter, and he still isn't a starter. After his last hip injury it was bound to happen.

Beasley, Juancho, and Nurkic all bugged me.
I still believe that Nurkic and Jokic would have worked, but they had to use the Jokic system and for whatever reason Malone was still trying to force them into traditional roles which was a huge mistake. By the time we traded him I understand why we had to do a terrible deal for us, although I partially blame Malone for that relationship getting that bad that quickly. Of course that is a habit of our front office.

Beasley should have been starting over Barton at least. Harris has at least brought great defense, but since his hot start Barton has struggled badly. Prior to the season there were many that felt Barton should have been traded and Beasley should have been the starting SF. Most young players are going to struggle with ever changing minutes and such a short leash as he and Juancho both had when we were healthy. Malone has said multiple times that Juancho and Beasley were never going to get minutes here, yet they are showing that they were both as good if not better than Barton. The fact that we traded both for a late 1st and end of the bench guys really bugs the **** out of me.
SkillzFromThe6
Junior
Posts: 327
And1: 355
Joined: Aug 08, 2018
Contact:
     

Re: Will Barton Thread 

Post#44 » by SkillzFromThe6 » Tue Feb 25, 2020 7:07 pm

I agree - I've said it before, Barton is best off the bench. Play him and if he's hot, let him play. If he's not hot, pull him and give him another try in the second half. We have the depth, so why not?


He plays and acts like a 6th man.

That is the good part of Barton, a guy confident no matter what. The bad part of Barton is that he will make comments like he did last night, acting like it was not a big deal instead of taking responsibility.


People on Twitter/Reddit strongly disagreed with me about his comment. They said I'm overreacting lol. That's the type of comment a guy like Dion Waiters/Swaggy P would say.

Beasley should have been starting over Barton at least. Harris has at least brought great defense, but since his hot start Barton has struggled badly. Prior to the season there were many that felt Barton should have been traded and Beasley should have been the starting SF. Most young players are going to struggle with ever changing minutes and such a short leash as he and Juancho both had when we were healthy. Malone has said multiple times that Juancho and Beasley were never going to get minutes here, yet they are showing that they were both as good if not better than Barton. The fact that we traded both for a late 1st and end of the bench guys really bugs the **** out of me.


Fans really hate Gary Harris this year, but he's proven to me in the playoffs (coming off injury) he's good to go. Even if he's not going offensively, we know he's GREAT defensively. If Will Barton is off offensively, he's not giving you that type of defense and perhaps not even GOOD defense.

I don't agree Beasley should have started, they needed his scoring off the bench. My ideal lineup WAS Murray, Gary, Craig, Grant, Jokic then Monte, Beasley, Barton, MPJ, Millsap. But, knowing me I rather not have Barton on the team at all and have Plumlee in there lol
The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: Will Barton Thread 

Post#45 » by The Rebel » Wed Nov 25, 2020 4:38 am

I keep reading things insinuating or just flat saying that Will Barton is a bad player, or that he has no trade value. I guess they forget how a year ago some were arguing he was the best player on the team.


While advanced stats all have some issues, usually by looking at several advanced stats you can get a really good idea about how good a player is. With Barton it can be eye opening.

For the Nuggets Barton is rated 2nd for defensive and net rating 5th for offensive ratings. While this rating depends on lineups, Barton was in a variety of lineups last year, and often the better players put up better numbers on the team. So this is saying that Barton was our 2nd best player overall last year.

There are many stats that try to put a players contribution all into 1 stat, here they are next to where Barton rated on the team.

Winshares 4th
Box plus/minus calculated by basketball reference 6th
VORP 3rd
PIPM 3rd
Raptor 2nd
Real plus minus 3rd

All these numbers indicate that Barton is easily in our top 4 most important players. While we all know what happened or should I say what the story is on what happened with the bubble, the fact is he is pretty damn important on our team.


As for where he belongs league wide, that is also interesting.
League wide
winshares 88th overall
PIPM 60th overall
Vorp 73rd overall
Real plus minus 70th overall

These are the 4 with easily available access to count, so I used them. On average they indicate that Barton is the 71st best player in the league.

Now there are a couple of things to know, all advanced stats have a hard time quantifying defense since a lot of defense does not show up in box scores, that is where PIPM and others like it try to figure in plus minus stats, Raptor, and Real plus Minus.

Winshares, Vorp, and Real plus minus all are affected by total accumulation and total minutes minutes played, where as PIPM is based on how productive those actual minutes are compared to other players.

Interestingly Barton is paid the 86th highest in the league. Actually making him somewhat underpaid for production last year.


So what this tells us is that Barton is paid correctly for the minutes he plays and is about an average to slightly above average starter in the NBA, if he was healthier and played more minutes he would arguably be a top 60 player in the league.


While we all know that Barton is not a great fit offensively for the team, he is still able to be an above average starter, where would he rank in a system that fits him? In the NBA there are approximately 430 players on full time NBA contracts, and is better than the average 3rd best player per team around the league.

All the time I see trade threads and crap pop up with the idea that Barton is some horrible contract that we should beg to get rid of usually for lesser players on worse contracts. Barton is not a great player, but guys on a level like him get traded for a prospect and future 1st all the time. They have a lot of value because they actually produce at a high level for a mid range contract. Not every guy on the team can be a superstar, the rest is about fit and how good your role players really are.
The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: Will Barton Thread 

Post#46 » by The Rebel » Mon Nov 30, 2020 4:44 pm

Read on Twitter


Looks like Barton and a lot of the others are back in town.
TunaFish
Head Coach
Posts: 6,543
And1: 6,124
Joined: Apr 08, 2005
 

Re: Will Barton Thread 

Post#47 » by TunaFish » Wed Dec 2, 2020 1:25 am

Read on Twitter
Canned in Denver.
The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: Will Barton Thread 

Post#48 » by The Rebel » Fri Dec 4, 2020 7:32 pm

In unsurprising news of the day.
[tweet]
Read on Twitter

[/tweet]

I wonder what we can get for him!
TunaFish
Head Coach
Posts: 6,543
And1: 6,124
Joined: Apr 08, 2005
 

Re: Will Barton Thread 

Post#49 » by TunaFish » Fri Dec 4, 2020 8:32 pm

Read on Twitter
Canned in Denver.
Richard Miller
Veteran
Posts: 2,934
And1: 2,982
Joined: Jan 24, 2011

Re: Will Barton Thread 

Post#50 » by Richard Miller » Fri Dec 4, 2020 8:33 pm

If he plays like at the beginning of the previous season, great. If not, well... :P
FilNugsFan
Sophomore
Posts: 220
And1: 255
Joined: Feb 20, 2017
 

Re: Will Barton Thread 

Post#51 » by FilNugsFan » Fri Dec 4, 2020 10:10 pm

I think I've seen Barton as our undersized starting SF long enough. It's either he starts at the 2 or be our sparkplug off the bench (I prefer the latter). Bottomline is, MPJ has to start.
TunaFish
Head Coach
Posts: 6,543
And1: 6,124
Joined: Apr 08, 2005
 

Re: Will Barton Thread 

Post#52 » by TunaFish » Fri Dec 4, 2020 11:58 pm

I want MPJ in the lineup as badly as anyone but Barton has a case based on his advanced stats from the beginning of the year. Can MPJ play power forward?

How about:

Murray - point
Harris - shooting guard
Barton - small forward
MPJ - power forward
Jokic - center
Canned in Denver.
The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: Will Barton Thread 

Post#53 » by The Rebel » Sat Dec 5, 2020 4:37 am

TunaFish wrote:I want MPJ in the lineup as badly as anyone but Barton has a case based on his advanced stats from the beginning of the year. Can MPJ play power forward?

How about:

Murray - point
Harris - shooting guard
Barton - small forward
MPJ - power forward
Jokic - center


If Marcus Morris had said that he was a starter on the Clippers this week would you think that was acceptable? If Hardaway was in Dallas telling interviewers that he was the starter would you not roll your eyes a little and wonder what he is thinking?

Malone came into camp saying that the only thing set in the lineup is PG and Center, and I think that is more than fair. I think everybody should be competing for minutes at the 2/3/4 and for every minute off the bench. Harris has regressed last we saw him, Millsap looked terrible in the bubble, Barton has struggled in the playoffs and late in games, MPJ has to improve his defense, Morris struggled to create for guys when Murray and Jokic were off the court, they all have holes in their game and can be replaced in the rotation. Whittington, Green, Dozier, Hartenstein, Bol, Campazzo, Cancar, Nnaji, Hampton, and Howard all deserve a chance to compete for minutes with the rest of the team as well. May the best players win.

My issue is with the way Barton talks about it. I read many tweets quoting him today, and just like every other time he acts like he is entitled to start. Saying things like I am a starter in this league, or just I am a starter, shows a huge sense of entitlement. I have never once heard him say that I feel like I am a starter and will prove it. Nothing about how he thinks there are more starting quality players than spots and he will earn it. The only guys who have shown they deserve to be starters on this team are Murray and Jokic. If Barton cannot handle competing for it and possibly losing that spot than we do not need him in the lockerroom bitching about it. You want it, earn it.
skywalker33
Nuggets Forum Mock Draft Champ
Posts: 14,091
And1: 5,451
Joined: Jun 02, 2014
       

Re: Will Barton Thread 

Post#54 » by skywalker33 » Sat Dec 5, 2020 5:08 am

The Rebel wrote:
TunaFish wrote:I want MPJ in the lineup as badly as anyone but Barton has a case based on his advanced stats from the beginning of the year. Can MPJ play power forward?

How about:

Murray - point
Harris - shooting guard
Barton - small forward
MPJ - power forward
Jokic - center


If Marcus Morris had said that he was a starter on the Clippers this week would you think that was acceptable? If Hardaway was in Dallas telling interviewers that he was the starter would you not roll your eyes a little and wonder what he is thinking?

Malone came into camp saying that the only thing set in the lineup is PG and Center, and I think that is more than fair. I think everybody should be competing for minutes at the 2/3/4 and for every minute off the bench. Harris has regressed last we saw him, Millsap looked terrible in the bubble, Barton has struggled in the playoffs and late in games, MPJ has to improve his defense, Morris struggled to create for guys when Murray and Jokic were off the court, they all have holes in their game and can be replaced in the rotation. Whittington, Green, Dozier, Hartenstein, Bol, Campazzo, Cancar, Nnaji, Hampton, and Howard all deserve a chance to compete for minutes with the rest of the team as well. May the best players win.

My issue is with the way Barton talks about it. I read many tweets quoting him today, and just like every other time he acts like he is entitled to start. Saying things like I am a starter in this league, or just I am a starter, shows a huge sense of entitlement. I have never once heard him say that I feel like I am a starter and will prove it. Nothing about how he thinks there are more starting quality players than spots and he will earn it. The only guys who have shown they deserve to be starters on this team are Murray and Jokic. If Barton cannot handle competing for it and possibly losing that spot than we do not need him in the lockerroom bitching about it. You want it, earn it.


I gotta agree, feels like he doesn’t think he needs to re-establish himself despite BAILING on us in the bubble. He may be a starter, certainly capable but not sure every team in the league sees him the way he sees himself. Feels like he’s just trying to manipulate his value in/around the league. That could actually benefit us down the road or just cause dissension on our team.
Texas Chuck wrote:I'd like to see Utah, and Denver lose


Exactly as I've been saying all along !!
eathb_au
Analyst
Posts: 3,377
And1: 1,118
Joined: May 30, 2010

Re: Will Barton Thread 

Post#55 » by eathb_au » Sat Dec 5, 2020 8:23 am

TunaFish wrote:I want MPJ in the lineup as badly as anyone but Barton has a case based on his advanced stats from the beginning of the year. Can MPJ play power forward?

How about:

Murray - point
Harris - shooting guard
Barton - small forward
MPJ - power forward
Jokic - center


This feels like an easy option just to keep Barton happy.

Either he accepts his role or we move him, this team has had way too many players bitch about their roles.
NuggetsWY
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,392
And1: 4,125
Joined: Oct 28, 2015
Location: Cheyenne, WY
 

Re: Will Barton Thread 

Post#56 » by NuggetsWY » Sat Dec 5, 2020 8:37 am

I'll give Barton credit for having some solid talent. However, I'm not convinced he's the starting SF on even half of the NBA teams. He might be the starting SG on around half of the teams, but I'm not too certain there either. The NBA has a history of having plenty of 6'6" guys that can score.

Barton has the attitude of an All-Star - something he has never achieved. Neither has he ever been the MVP on any team he has played on in the NBA.

The Nuggets have not explained what happened during the bubble, neither has Barton. But it surely does seem like he abandoned the team. Then again, those were crazy times, so perhaps we shouldn't put too much emphasis on that.

I've looked at every statistic I can find to try to prove my belief that Barton is better off the bench than he is as a starter, and I'm not sure I can prove that belief statistically. The eye-test seems to say he's better off the bench and his skill set seems like less than ideal in a lineup with Jokic & Murray.

Malone will decide whether Barton starts or comes off the bench and even though I'm still not a Malone fan, I'll give him credit for being a man that is not afraid to make a decision that isn't popular. So we'll have to wait and see what he decides.
User avatar
THE J0KER
Forum Mod - Nuggets
Forum Mod - Nuggets
Posts: 7,417
And1: 6,813
Joined: Apr 12, 2017
 

Re: Will Barton Thread 

Post#57 » by THE J0KER » Sat Dec 5, 2020 1:53 pm

eathb_au wrote:
TunaFish wrote:I want MPJ in the lineup as badly as anyone but Barton has a case based on his advanced stats from the beginning of the year. Can MPJ play power forward?

How about:

Murray - point
Harris - shooting guard
Barton - small forward
MPJ - power forward
Jokic - center


This feels like an easy option just to keep Barton happy.

Either he accepts his role or we move him, this team has had way too many players bitch about their roles.
But the same 'dreaming' strategy about Nurkic and lately Plumlee playing as starters together with Jokic, very fast turned into 'nightmare' when becomes too obvious that they are bad fit which fundamentally damages badly Jokic production.

I can't see how Barton's game style and profile can be adjusted to Murray and Porter without damaging their best game, and Barton's *on-floor general* attitude is not a perfect fit for Jokic too.

I can't see any problem when Barton is on the court with ONE player of the Murray/MPJ/Jokic trio. I see the problem when Barton is on the court with TWO of them. And I see a BIG problem when Barton and all big-3 are together on the court.

So, despite individually speaking this lineup Murray-Harris-Barton-Porter-Jokic is the best currently, because of Burton's bad fit this lineup will be better and more effective in reality if you replace Barton with Millsap or Green (even Bol if you ask me).
The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: Will Barton Thread 

Post#58 » by The Rebel » Sat Dec 5, 2020 2:33 pm

NuggetsWY wrote:I'll give Barton credit for having some solid talent. However, I'm not convinced he's the starting SF on even half of the NBA teams. He might be the starting SG on around half of the teams, but I'm not too certain there either. The NBA has a history of having plenty of 6'6" guys that can score.

Barton has the attitude of an All-Star - something he has never achieved. Neither has he ever been the MVP on any team he has played on in the NBA.

The Nuggets have not explained what happened during the bubble, neither has Barton. But it surely does seem like he abandoned the team. Then again, those were crazy times, so perhaps we shouldn't put too much emphasis on that.

I've looked at every statistic I can find to try to prove my belief that Barton is better off the bench than he is as a starter, and I'm not sure I can prove that belief statistically. The eye-test seems to say he's better off the bench and his skill set seems like less than ideal in a lineup with Jokic & Murray.

Malone will decide whether Barton starts or comes off the bench and even though I'm still not a Malone fan, I'll give him credit for being a man that is not afraid to make a decision that isn't popular. So we'll have to wait and see what he decides.


the problem is that Barton has only come off the bench 5 games in the last 2 seasons, if you go back 3 seasons it is actually pretty clear that he plays better as a starter. in 2017-2018 his stats were considerably better as a starter than they were as a bench guy, even if you adjust for per minute it is clear that he is better as a starter.

IN the 10 most used 5 man lineups with Barton it is very odd. 3 of the top 4 linesup with Barton are all with Morris at PG and Jokic at C although his 3 worst 5 man lineups also feature Morris and 1 of them has Jokic. Yet Murray and Barton as a 2 man lineup is +9.1 which is his 2nd highest lineup next to Millsap and Barton. The oddest thing is that lineups with Barton have pretty dramatic swings, his top 4 lineups that he was in were a +17.1 or better but his bottom 4 lineups that he was in were -10.7 or worse. Most guys you find 4-6 lineups that are between +10 and -10, with Barton you have 2 and 1 of them is our starting lineup. So in other words there is no easy answer to who or what situation Barton works best in as changing out 1 or 2 guys produces wide swings in effectiveness with Barton on the court.

I do think Barton is underrated, he can start for at least half the teams in the league if not more since he can effectively play SG and SF. That has value around the league, and between his injuries, what happened in the bubble, and his constant insistence that he start without earning it, I prefer they trade him for someone willing to come in and put in the work to earn their role on this team.
The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: Will Barton Thread 

Post#59 » by The Rebel » Sat Dec 5, 2020 2:49 pm

eathb_au wrote:
TunaFish wrote:I want MPJ in the lineup as badly as anyone but Barton has a case based on his advanced stats from the beginning of the year. Can MPJ play power forward?

How about:

Murray - point
Harris - shooting guard
Barton - small forward
MPJ - power forward
Jokic - center


This feels like an easy option just to keep Barton happy.

Either he accepts his role or we move him, this team has had way too many players bitch about their roles.


One thing I think Malone has a problem with is his ability to get players to buy into their role if it is a role that does not fit what they think their talents are. You are right over the last few years we have had a lot of guys who openly bitched about their role.

My issue is that I cannot remember a contender that had role players openly bitching about their roles. That always causes issues in the locker room and eventually on the court as one guy decides he is going to do what he wants. Personally I prefer Barton is traded now before he has a chance to screw up the locker room.
TunaFish
Head Coach
Posts: 6,543
And1: 6,124
Joined: Apr 08, 2005
 

Re: Will Barton Thread 

Post#60 » by TunaFish » Sat Dec 5, 2020 8:50 pm

Read on Twitter


Interesting observation from Singer who always seems to have an ear from management. He also posted Barton's direct quote. We can quibble about what Barton means because there's a lot of ways to look at it including Singer's.

I have no argument with anyone here about how difficult his statement makes it appear concerning whether Barton will fill the 6th man slot. I am of the opinion that if you asked that question to most any NBA player you would likely get the same answer. What NBA player would not state that they have starter quality talent? At the least, they would lie to themselves in the face of their stats.

If we are talking about the same Will Barton that I saw at the beginning of this season, fully recovered from his injuries and looking ready to play, would we really want to keep him from starting. If this truly is an open competition, I have a hard time betting against "the Thrill" winning a starting slot and my guess is the loser would be Green or MIllsap.

If it is solely about filing the 6th man slot, would not Green or Millsap or Morris or Bol not be a possible solution. If it is about needing to get MPJ minutes then why not think more constructively about the possibility of MPJ starting at power forward and then moving him to small forward at times to get Green or MIllsap into the lineup. Barton could move to shooting guard similarly. Bol could get minutes at small forward as well.

The only guys you have to keep in the lineup at critical moments are Jokic and Murray. However, early in the season you may want to restrict their minutes to keep them fresh for the playoffs.

Correct me if I am mistaken but didn't MPJ play some power forward (on defense) in the playoffs? Didn't I see him switch to power forward on defense often with Grant moving to small forward on defense? Would MPJ have a more difficult time adjusting to perimeter shooters on defense? Does MPJ need to be near the basket to take advantage of his rebounding?

The big issue with this alignment would be whether MPJ can guard a power forward in the paint. I think he can.
Canned in Denver.

Return to Denver Nuggets