ImageImageImage

2017 Draft

Moderator: THE J0KER

The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: 2017 Draft 

Post#481 » by The Rebel » Fri Jun 23, 2017 6:39 am

skywalker33 wrote:
The Rebel wrote:
skywalker33 wrote:
Can't see a free agent like Paul Milsap or CP3 truly considering us after this showing...pathetic !


Really? you think free agents like Millsap or CP3 give a **** about mid-1st round picks?


I absolutely think free agents look at how their potential FO's conduct business !!! It's not all about the money, it's the quality of the organization and between the Nurkic trade and this draft, you don't think their is going to be some red flags drawn out ?? As for Milsap, how do you see him looking at a roster with FIVE PF's (two just acquired) ???


Just stop, you are overreacting because you don't like the draft. Free agents are looking at how teams treat their players, and whether you or anybody else likes it or not, the Nurkic trade actually helped the front office with free agents. We took a bad trade to make an **** player that was pouting happy. they love that kind of crap. They do not care if the team trades back and pick up a prospect. If anything they look at it like they can use those players as trade chips when they start forcing the front office to make deals.

As for Millsap, who gives a ****? Is your goal to sign guys like Millsap or is it a championship? After 3 great drafts in a row I would say this front office has earned the benefit of the doubt, and has a better record on the draft than anybody on Realgm. They always target a position and they draft a couple of guys there, last year it was guard, this year PF. I would bet they got a good one out of the 3 they drafted.
The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: 2017 Draft 

Post#482 » by The Rebel » Fri Jun 23, 2017 6:43 am

MHZ wrote:
The Rebel wrote:
NuggetsWY wrote:Anybody else have to go look up our newest draft-n-stash? Vlatko Cancar: I think we can wait 2 or 3 years before we have to learn how to pronounce his name. :wink:


He is coming out of the same team where we got Jokic, which is the same league that Nurkic came out of, I may actually be higher on him than I am either of the other 2 picks.


I think that's a good bet. Our FO can certainly scout Europe. Better than just about anybody, and I feel confident when we take a European kid.

I cannot name the thing they're second best at, and I'm 100% serious.

It is not: roster construction, selling/closing free agents, making deals with other teams, making hard decisions in the best interets of the team, having a vision and executing against it versus just kind of hoping things happen for you, etc.

They haven't made a trade that we could call a good one since Will Barton, and that was two and a half years ago.

They did well on the Joffrey deal last year.
The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: 2017 Draft 

Post#483 » by The Rebel » Fri Jun 23, 2017 6:49 am

Ayatollah wrote:Nuggets will stuck in mediocrity. How can you trade such solid value like the 13th pick for Lyles and draft another PF. I mean Lyles could be a solid fit on the PF but not at that price. But it seems the Nuggets FO valued this year´s draft as one of the worst if you look at them dumping 1sts like garbage.

What´s the reason they didn´t swing a deal for Eric Bledsoe? He would´ve been perfect for their ambitions (prime age PG with incredible defense and leadership skills).

But now they have the worst PG core in the league and a bunch of mediocre Power Forwards.

If they won´t make a splash in free agency the postseason will be out of reach, no doubt about that IMO.

Moving back 11 spots and getting a rpospect you like while not being forced to reach on a guy is an overpay?

By they way tell me a single draft that has had more than 3 all stars drafted in the last 50 picks in the draft, even the 96 and 03 drafts didn't get to that point. Our front office has an incredible record with the draft and scouting, how is your record?

LOL, they didn't trade for Bledsoe because they did not like the players that the Suns were requesting. It is funny how you always show up to comment but we all know you do not watch the Nuggets and know nothing about them. Murray is the PG of the future, there are several better PGs on the free agent market this summer to be placeholders.

We have $37 million in cap space while still retaining Plumlee's cap hold the offseason is far from over, and sorry the only team you can even try to argue getting better today was the Twolves, and I still don't think they will be better next year after the offseason is all said and done.

I think we will be fine, and the truth is anybody that thinks you are building a playoff contender based on the 13th overall pick taken in the same year needs to have their head examined.
User avatar
Mich3006
Head Coach
Posts: 6,492
And1: 3,682
Joined: Jul 04, 2009
Location: Lower Bavaria, Germany
     

Re: 2017 Draft 

Post#484 » by Mich3006 » Fri Jun 23, 2017 7:15 am

The Rebel wrote:
Ayatollah wrote:Nuggets will stuck in mediocrity. How can you trade such solid value like the 13th pick for Lyles and draft another PF. I mean Lyles could be a solid fit on the PF but not at that price. But it seems the Nuggets FO valued this year´s draft as one of the worst if you look at them dumping 1sts like garbage.

What´s the reason they didn´t swing a deal for Eric Bledsoe? He would´ve been perfect for their ambitions (prime age PG with incredible defense and leadership skills).

But now they have the worst PG core in the league and a bunch of mediocre Power Forwards.

If they won´t make a splash in free agency the postseason will be out of reach, no doubt about that IMO.

Moving back 11 spots and getting a rpospect you like while not being forced to reach on a guy is an overpay?

By they way tell me a single draft that has had more than 3 all stars drafted in the last 50 picks in the draft, even the 96 and 03 drafts didn't get to that point. Our front office has an incredible record with the draft and scouting, how is your record?

LOL, they didn't trade for Bledsoe because they did not like the players that the Suns were requesting. It is funny how you always show up to comment but we all know you do not watch the Nuggets and know nothing about them. Murray is the PG of the future, there are several better PGs on the free agent market this summer to be placeholders.

We have $37 million in cap space while still retaining Plumlee's cap hold the offseason is far from over, and sorry the only team you can even try to argue getting better today was the Twolves, and I still don't think they will be better next year after the offseason is all said and done.

I think we will be fine, and the truth is anybody that thinks you are building a playoff contender based on the 13th overall pick taken in the same year needs to have their head examined.

Lyles isn´t worth trading down 9 spots in the 1st round, that´s my opinion (I guess it´s allowed to post your own point of view, even if you act like team boards are only for die-heart fans).

Regarding "your" PG situation: Murray might be your future PG but you didn´t know nothing as well because he only played a few games as playmaker and he had some flashes but his overall rookie campaign wasn´t more than solid. On the other hand, Eric Bledsoe is a very good PG on a solid contract with two years left (free agent PG´s in his category will receive way more money). Murray could´ve had all the time to learn being a playmaker (even if you think I don´t know nothing about them I know he was a SG on college), now he and Mudiay have to deliver or the Nuggets have to overpay for a PG.

But it´s only my opinion and I promise I will stop stealing your time and posting on your own personal board.
The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: 2017 Draft 

Post#485 » by The Rebel » Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:07 am

Ayatollah wrote:
The Rebel wrote:
Ayatollah wrote:Nuggets will stuck in mediocrity. How can you trade such solid value like the 13th pick for Lyles and draft another PF. I mean Lyles could be a solid fit on the PF but not at that price. But it seems the Nuggets FO valued this year´s draft as one of the worst if you look at them dumping 1sts like garbage.

What´s the reason they didn´t swing a deal for Eric Bledsoe? He would´ve been perfect for their ambitions (prime age PG with incredible defense and leadership skills).

But now they have the worst PG core in the league and a bunch of mediocre Power Forwards.

If they won´t make a splash in free agency the postseason will be out of reach, no doubt about that IMO.

Moving back 11 spots and getting a rpospect you like while not being forced to reach on a guy is an overpay?

By they way tell me a single draft that has had more than 3 all stars drafted in the last 50 picks in the draft, even the 96 and 03 drafts didn't get to that point. Our front office has an incredible record with the draft and scouting, how is your record?

LOL, they didn't trade for Bledsoe because they did not like the players that the Suns were requesting. It is funny how you always show up to comment but we all know you do not watch the Nuggets and know nothing about them. Murray is the PG of the future, there are several better PGs on the free agent market this summer to be placeholders.

We have $37 million in cap space while still retaining Plumlee's cap hold the offseason is far from over, and sorry the only team you can even try to argue getting better today was the Twolves, and I still don't think they will be better next year after the offseason is all said and done.

I think we will be fine, and the truth is anybody that thinks you are building a playoff contender based on the 13th overall pick taken in the same year needs to have their head examined.

Lyles isn´t worth trading down 9 spots in the 1st round, that´s my opinion (I guess it´s allowed to post your own point of view, even if you act like team boards are only for die-heart fans).


Not die hard fans, but if you are trying to act like an expert on a team you obviously know little about than expect to be called on it.

As for Lyles, you don't think he was worth that, who should the Nuggets have picked? DJ Wilson was picked 17th overall and is 3 months younger than Lyles and has many of the same strengths and weaknesses as Lyles, I would rather have Lyles over Wilson, but yet it was not worth moving back when nobody that fits our needs was available at that pick?
Ayatollah wrote:Regarding "your" PG situation: Murray might be your future PG but you didn´t know nothing as well because he only played a few games as playmaker and he had some flashes but his overall rookie campaign wasn´t more than solid. On the other hand, Eric Bledsoe is a very good PG on a solid contract with two years left (free agent PG´s in his category will receive way more money). Murray could´ve had all the time to learn being a playmaker (even if you think I don´t know nothing about them I know he was a SG on college), now he and Mudiay have to deliver or the Nuggets have to overpay for a PG.

But it´s only my opinion and I promise I will stop stealing your time and posting on your own personal board.


Now I know plenty about Murray, you see I have done more than look at a stat sheet. I have heard the numerous radio and TV interviews from guys like Isaih Thomas and Doc Rivers both of whom could not quit talking about Jokic and Murray. I have heard the front office and coaching staff rave about the guy, I have heard Make Miller rave about him, and most importantly I have watched him and was impressed before I even knew about the hernia issues. By the way Murray was a SG in college while playing for a coach who said that there is no such things as PGs anymore, and the starting PG and current NBA player who was by far the 2nd best player on that team was a 5'9" PG, they had no choice but to play him at SG. But in the NBA Murray is at his best at PG, he is a PG for his national team, he was a PG in high school, he was a PG in AAU, the only people who don't think he is a PG read scouting reports from last year and look at stat sheets, the rest know he is a PG and a damn good one at that.

By the way I know who Bledsoe is, he is an overpaid injury prone PG that would make a good placeholder for the next year or two while Murray finishes developing. What is the difference between overpaying Bledsoe or overpaying a free agent PG? Although I doubt we have to overpay a PG in free agency, you see we don't need a superstar, or even an all star this summer, we just need a placeholder. We aren't winning a championship this season either way, and Jokic is a better shot creator than 75% of the PGs around the league anyway.
User avatar
Mich3006
Head Coach
Posts: 6,492
And1: 3,682
Joined: Jul 04, 2009
Location: Lower Bavaria, Germany
     

Re: 2017 Draft 

Post#486 » by Mich3006 » Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:23 am

The Rebel wrote:Not die hard fans, but if you are trying to act like an expert on a team you obviously know little about than expect to be called on it.

As for Lyles, you don't think he was worth that, who should the Nuggets have picked? DJ Wilson was picked 17th overall and is 3 months younger than Lyles and has many of the same strengths and weaknesses as Lyles, I would rather have Lyles over Wilson, but yet it was not worth moving back when nobody that fits our needs was available at that pick?
Ayatollah wrote:Regarding "your" PG situation: Murray might be your future PG but you didn´t know nothing as well because he only played a few games as playmaker and he had some flashes but his overall rookie campaign wasn´t more than solid. On the other hand, Eric Bledsoe is a very good PG on a solid contract with two years left (free agent PG´s in his category will receive way more money). Murray could´ve had all the time to learn being a playmaker (even if you think I don´t know nothing about them I know he was a SG on college), now he and Mudiay have to deliver or the Nuggets have to overpay for a PG.

But it´s only my opinion and I promise I will stop stealing your time and posting on your own personal board.


Now I know plenty about Murray, you see I have done more than look at a stat sheet. I have heard the numerous radio and TV interviews from guys like Isaih Thomas and Doc Rivers both of whom could not quit talking about Jokic and Murray. I have heard the front office and coaching staff rave about the guy, I have heard Make Miller rave about him, and most importantly I have watched him and was impressed before I even knew about the hernia issues. By the way Murray was a SG in college while playing for a coach who said that there is no such things as PGs anymore, and the starting PG and current NBA player who was by far the 2nd best player on that team was a 5'9" PG, they had no choice but to play him at SG. But in the NBA Murray is at his best at PG, he is a PG for his national team, he was a PG in high school, he was a PG in AAU, the only people who don't think he is a PG read scouting reports from last year and look at stat sheets, the rest know he is a PG and a damn good one at that.

By the way I know who Bledsoe is, he is an overpaid injury prone PG that would make a good placeholder for the next year or two while Murray finishes developing. What is the difference between overpaying Bledsoe or overpaying a free agent PG? Although I doubt we have to overpay a PG in free agency, you see we don't need a superstar, or even an all star this summer, we just need a placeholder. We aren't winning a championship this season either way, and Jokic is a better shot creator than 75% of the PGs around the league anyway.

First of all, I never acted like an Nuggets expert but I like the team and wants to talk about them, sorry but I thought this is the essence of a forum.

Lyles isn´t a defensive minded player. He has the potential to stretch the floor but Hernangomez could do this as well. I thought you guys wants to upgrade your defense, so even if you don´t take on Anunoby you can trade that pick for better fitting players.

I really hope you´re right regarding Murray because even if you heard thousand different people praising his skills he still has to prove it. And calling a 21-5-6 player on a $14M/year contract overpayed, even if often injured, is weird.

But everybody has its own opinion and it´s interesting to read those.
Sir Psycho Sexy
Senior
Posts: 629
And1: 502
Joined: Jul 26, 2013
Location: Serbia

Re: 2017 Draft 

Post#487 » by Sir Psycho Sexy » Fri Jun 23, 2017 10:25 am

Vlatko Cancar (last name pronounced Chanchar not really hard just a bit funny :D ) is a prospect with a big upside. He has great length (don't know actual measurements, going by eye test) for a SF and can score from any position, he had 51/41/86 last season for 8/3/2 and a steal in 18 minutes. He can put the ball on the floor and get to the hoop, has surprisingly fast first step. Not creative dribbler but if he has space he'll go for it. He has active hands on the defense, still not strong enough to defend better SFs in ABA league. He wasn't consistent enough in the offense, sometimes he would score 0 and sometimes 20.
All in all next season will be a better showcase for him, this one was his first among pros where he actually played quality minutes and he showed that he can play but we'll see how good next season. Potentially I could see him coming over in 2 years if he continues developing like this.
NuggetsWY
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,392
And1: 4,125
Joined: Oct 28, 2015
Location: Cheyenne, WY
 

Re: 2017 Draft 

Post#488 » by NuggetsWY » Fri Jun 23, 2017 12:12 pm

Ayatollah wrote:
The Rebel wrote:
Ayatollah wrote:Nuggets will stuck in mediocrity. How can you trade such solid value like the 13th pick for Lyles and draft another PF. I mean Lyles could be a solid fit on the PF but not at that price. But it seems the Nuggets FO valued this year´s draft as one of the worst if you look at them dumping 1sts like garbage.

What´s the reason they didn´t swing a deal for Eric Bledsoe? He would´ve been perfect for their ambitions (prime age PG with incredible defense and leadership skills).

But now they have the worst PG core in the league and a bunch of mediocre Power Forwards.

If they won´t make a splash in free agency the postseason will be out of reach, no doubt about that IMO.

Moving back 11 spots and getting a rpospect you like while not being forced to reach on a guy is an overpay?

By they way tell me a single draft that has had more than 3 all stars drafted in the last 50 picks in the draft, even the 96 and 03 drafts didn't get to that point. Our front office has an incredible record with the draft and scouting, how is your record?

LOL, they didn't trade for Bledsoe because they did not like the players that the Suns were requesting. It is funny how you always show up to comment but we all know you do not watch the Nuggets and know nothing about them. Murray is the PG of the future, there are several better PGs on the free agent market this summer to be placeholders.

We have $37 million in cap space while still retaining Plumlee's cap hold the offseason is far from over, and sorry the only team you can even try to argue getting better today was the Twolves, and I still don't think they will be better next year after the offseason is all said and done.

I think we will be fine, and the truth is anybody that thinks you are building a playoff contender based on the 13th overall pick taken in the same year needs to have their head examined.

Lyles isn´t worth trading down 9 spots in the 1st round, that´s my opinion (I guess it´s allowed to post your own point of view, even if you act like team boards are only for die-heart fans).

Regarding "your" PG situation: Murray might be your future PG but you didn´t know nothing as well because he only played a few games as playmaker and he had some flashes but his overall rookie campaign wasn´t more than solid. On the other hand, Eric Bledsoe is a very good PG on a solid contract with two years left (free agent PG´s in his category will receive way more money). Murray could´ve had all the time to learn being a playmaker (even if you think I don´t know nothing about them I know he was a SG on college), now he and Mudiay have to deliver or the Nuggets have to overpay for a PG.

But it´s only my opinion and I promise I will stop stealing your time and posting on your own personal board.

Yup, just opinions but did you research Murray? He was a PG in high school. He was a PG on the Canadian national team and until Kentucky signed the very short Ulis as his running mate, he expected to be a PG in college. Now everyone thinks he's a SG. BTW, he's the perfect PG with Jokic running the offense. He can shoot, he can drive, and he can pass. Somewhat like (but at a different level) maybe a player that's been a recent two-time MVP.
NuggetsWY
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,392
And1: 4,125
Joined: Oct 28, 2015
Location: Cheyenne, WY
 

Re: 2017 Draft 

Post#489 » by NuggetsWY » Fri Jun 23, 2017 12:14 pm

Sir Psycho Sexy wrote:Vlatko Cancar (last name pronounced Chanchar not really hard just a bit funny :D ) is a prospect with a big upside. He has great length (don't know actual measurements, going by eye test) for a SF and can score from any position, he had 51/41/86 last season for 8/3/2 and a steal in 18 minutes. He can put the ball on the floor and get to the hoop, has surprisingly fast first step. Not creative dribbler but if he has space he'll go for it. He has active hands on the defense, still not strong enough to defend better SFs in ABA league. He wasn't consistent enough in the offense, sometimes he would score 0 and sometimes 20.
All in all next season will be a better showcase for him, this one was his first among pros where he actually played quality minutes and he showed that he can play but we'll see how good next season. Potentially I could see him coming over in 2 years if he continues developing like this.

Thanks, I saw some of those stats but I appreciate the opinion. It sounds like he needs to mature and based on his age, that makes sense.
NuggetsWY
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,392
And1: 4,125
Joined: Oct 28, 2015
Location: Cheyenne, WY
 

Re: 2017 Draft 

Post#490 » by NuggetsWY » Fri Jun 23, 2017 1:11 pm

Biggest frustration from this draft:

Nuggets traded for and drafted two players that appear to be very Hernangomez-like. That isn't necessarily bad; good attitude, good shooter however not defenders.

One of the things everyone has said, including the Nuggets; the Nuggets need to consolidate, meaning we have plenty of role players but no clear cut leaders at their positions.

Jokic is the starting center (only center on the team) and we love it.
Who is the starting PF? I'm not even going to try to guess.
Who is the starting SF? Chandler? Unless we sign Gallinari? Probably.
Harris is our starting SG with backups of Barton, Murray, Beasley (a little over-stocked IMO).
Who is the starting PG? Probably Nelson? Should be Murray? What do we do with Mudiay?

We had multiple players not happy because they weren't getting enough minutes and/or they didn't understand their role. This is going to get even worse IMO.
skywalker33
Nuggets Forum Mock Draft Champ
Posts: 14,106
And1: 5,458
Joined: Jun 02, 2014
       

Re: 2017 Draft 

Post#491 » by skywalker33 » Fri Jun 23, 2017 2:43 pm

NuggetsWY wrote:Biggest frustration from this draft:

Nuggets traded for and drafted two players that appear to be very Hernangomez-like. That isn't necessarily bad; good attitude, good shooter however not defenders.

One of the things everyone has said, including the Nuggets; the Nuggets need to consolidate, meaning we have plenty of role players but no clear cut leaders at their positions.

Jokic is the starting center (only center on the team) and we love it.
Who is the starting PF? I'm not even going to try to guess.
Who is the starting SF? Chandler? Unless we sign Gallinari? Probably.
Harris is our starting SG with backups of Barton, Murray, Beasley (a little over-stocked IMO).
Who is the starting PG? Probably Nelson? Should be Murray? What do we do with Mudiay?

We had multiple players not happy because they weren't getting enough minutes and/or they didn't understand their role. This is going to get even worse IMO.


And as I recall, the defense was identified by the FO as our biggest area of need, did we address that ??? Hell no we traded down. Mitchell is a better defender than what we got in this draft, traded him away. Could've just selected Anunoby at 13 and let him finish healing on the bench for most of the season (as Malone said that whoever was selected wouldn't see much time anyway), that would've been the safe move. No, seems the Nuggets wanted to outsmart everyone and get him at a lower pick...how'd that work out ???? They outsmarted themselves.....

Now at 24, not saying Lydon is a bad pick but he doesn't come across as a plus defender. He's a Gallo replacement, pure and simple. If we going to go back to the outscore the opponent philosophy, so be it but don't give us this BS that we need to improve our defense and then do NOTHING about it. Such rhetoric !!!!
Texas Chuck wrote:I'd like to see Utah, and Denver lose


Exactly as I've been saying all along !!
User avatar
psimanic1
Starter
Posts: 2,497
And1: 1,230
Joined: Jul 14, 2014

Re: 2017 Draft 

Post#492 » by psimanic1 » Fri Jun 23, 2017 2:53 pm

well, now we have Faried, Arthur, Chandler, Barton, Nelson, Mudiay to trade and get some guys that would play Defense...
I hope we go into season with:
Murray, Beverley, Morris
Harris, Beasley
SomeSfThatCanPlayDefense, Juancho
Lyles, Lydon
Jokic, notPlumlee

It's young team, but if you give them year or two they could become something great i guess...
Powder Blue
Analyst
Posts: 3,444
And1: 642
Joined: Dec 28, 2004
   

Re: 2017 Draft 

Post#493 » by Powder Blue » Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:23 pm

MHZ wrote:
The Rebel wrote:
NuggetsWY wrote:Anybody else have to go look up our newest draft-n-stash? Vlatko Cancar: I think we can wait 2 or 3 years before we have to learn how to pronounce his name. :wink:


He is coming out of the same team where we got Jokic, which is the same league that Nurkic came out of, I may actually be higher on him than I am either of the other 2 picks.


I think that's a good bet. Our FO can certainly scout Europe. Better than just about anybody, and I feel confident when we take a European kid.

I cannot name the thing they're second best at, and I'm 100% serious.

It is not: roster construction, selling/closing free agents, making deals with other teams, making hard decisions in the best interest of the team, having a vision and executing against it versus just kind of hoping things happen for you, etc.

Drafting Jokic and the Harris/Nurkic trade were absolutely A+. Barton trade was nice. It's really, really sketchy otherwise. Their inaction has been shocking more often than not.

People around here trash Malone, but the front office has not helped him.

The next few months are huge. This conference is really good.


Exactly....Roster construction constitutes a combination of draft/trades/free agency. Look at this roster now, It's a mess. Frankly it's been a mess for awhile and they made it worse with this draft. At some point the front office has to be judged on what they've done...not what they might do in the future.

Someone please explain the vision being executed cause I don't see it...
Powder Blue
Analyst
Posts: 3,444
And1: 642
Joined: Dec 28, 2004
   

Re: 2017 Draft 

Post#494 » by Powder Blue » Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:41 pm

Really well written article..

https://www.denverstiffs.com/2017/6/23/15861436/the-importance-of-vision-denver-nuggets-draft-free-agency

The Nuggets have no identifiable identity to sell to free agents. Who wants to join the team that has 4 shooting guards and 6 power forwards and wait for Denver to figure it out?

They have a ton of young players and are one of just three NBA teams without a G League affiliate, so they’ll have to beg other teams to get their youngsters some much needed playing time, under a coach who is not beholden to the Nuggets or their vision in any way...

Tim Connelly has preached patience and flexibility in the last two offseasons, but that flexibility is starting to look very reactionary. Every summer and every trade deadline the Nuggets come back with the same line about how they “made some calls” and “thought they had some deals” and “tried” but the roster stays the same. The guys who leave are the guys who agitate. If Nurkic hadn’t said anything would he still be here? Probably. Wilson Chandler made some tweets to the effect that he himself should have been more vocal about his desire to leave.

When your veterans and backups want to leave and you either cannot make trades or lose the ones you do make, that’s a bad look. There’s no point in hoarding decently-talented youth if you can neither find them playing time nor move them for value.
proscout
Junior
Posts: 430
And1: 26
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
Location: AZ
         

Re: 2017 Draft 

Post#495 » by proscout » Fri Jun 23, 2017 4:04 pm

While I don't think we dropped the ball in a huge way and the sky is falling like some do, I also agree that we continue to fall short when it comes to making any sort of moves to consolidate our assets.

I would have done that Bledsoe deal in a heartbeat, if the rumor of Mudiay and the 13th was true.

We turned the 13th into Lyles and Lydon. If we had traded for Bledsoe, we would have had to move Nelson. He's obviously not in high demand, but let's say we could have moved him for a future 2nd. Which of the two lists, then, would you rather have:

A - Mudiay, Nelson, Lyles, Lydon
B - Bledsoe, future 2nd

Given our current roster and the need to consolidate, I'd rather have option B and that way we also have 2 less PFs on the roster so it makes it a little more reasonable to go out and spend some on a PF in free agency. I don't want the Nuggets to panic and make a move just for the sake of it, but they've got to do something, and this is a move that would add to our present team without sacrificing the future.

Because even for Butler, I would not have traded Harris or Murray. They could be good for a long time. And adding Butler to this team now would make us quite a bit better, as it did Minnesota. But let's be real, with the Warriors where they are, the Nuggets want to hit their peak in 2-3 years. They don't want to sell a big part of the future to take a huge leap next year, like Minny did, because Minny is still nowhere near beating the Warriors. This Bledsoe trade would have made us a little better now, which means hopefully in the playoffs, without sacrificing that ideal peak time of 2-3 years down the road. It also sends a signal that Denver knows what it's doing and wants to improve but won't be stupid in the way they do it.

I dunno, just my two cents on what everyone is commenting on in here. I know I don't comment much, but I read here regularly and wanted to add to this discussion.
MidMountain
Senior
Posts: 509
And1: 236
Joined: Jun 29, 2009
Location: midwest
       

Re: 2017 Draft 

Post#496 » by MidMountain » Fri Jun 23, 2017 4:14 pm

proscout wrote:While I don't think we dropped the ball in a huge way and the sky is falling like some do, I also agree that we continue to fall short when it comes to making any sort of moves to consolidate our assets.

I would have done that Bledsoe deal in a heartbeat, if the rumor of Mudiay and the 13th was true.

We turned the 13th into Lyles and Lydon. If we had traded for Bledsoe, we would have had to move Nelson. He's obviously not in high demand, but let's say we could have moved him for a future 2nd. Which of the two lists, then, would you rather have:

A - Mudiay, Nelson, Lyles, Lydon
B - Bledsoe, future 2nd

Given our current roster and the need to consolidate, I'd rather have option B and that way we also have 2 less PFs on the roster so it makes it a little more reasonable to go out and spend some on a PF in free agency. I don't want the Nuggets to panic and make a move just for the sake of it, but they've got to do something, and this is a move that would add to our present team without sacrificing the future.

Because even for Butler, I would not have traded Harris or Murray. They could be good for a long time. And adding Butler to this team now would make us quite a bit better, as it did Minnesota. But let's be real, with the Warriors where they are, the Nuggets want to hit their peak in 2-3 years. They don't want to sell a big part of the future to take a huge leap next year, like Minny did, because Minny is still nowhere near beating the Warriors. This Bledsoe trade would have made us a little better now, which means hopefully in the playoffs, without sacrificing that ideal peak time of 2-3 years down the road. It also sends a signal that Denver knows what it's doing and wants to improve but won't be stupid in the way they do it.

I dunno, just my two cents on what everyone is commenting on in here. I know I don't comment much, but I read here regularly and wanted to add to this discussion.


My guess is that Bledsoe would have been traded if the Celtics had taken Josh Jackson, leaving Fox for PHX.
MidMountain
Senior
Posts: 509
And1: 236
Joined: Jun 29, 2009
Location: midwest
       

Re: 2017 Draft 

Post#497 » by MidMountain » Fri Jun 23, 2017 4:20 pm

Connely has always mentioned luck as a component in his draft success. People compliment him on the Murray the pick, but we got lucky that he didn't get nabbed with 5 or 6. If Toronto doesn't pick OG with the 23 and we get him at 24, people would be complimenting him on how shrewd he was to trade down. He took a risk, but not all risks pay off, since some of it is luck. Not every decision is going to be a hit, the mark of a good GM is more hits than misses.
proscout
Junior
Posts: 430
And1: 26
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
Location: AZ
         

Re: 2017 Draft 

Post#498 » by proscout » Fri Jun 23, 2017 4:27 pm

Eh, I don't know about that. I've lived in Phoenix for quite some time now so I follow the Suns and listen to all their sports chatter here. They wanted a SF from the get-go. They were worried about missing out on Jackson after they "got screwed" and fell a couple spots in the draft, but they would have taken Tatum if the Celtics took Jackson.

They also are split on Bledsoe. Most of my friends here who are Suns fans want him traded and to go with Knight at PG and the young Ulis to back him up. If they could have moved Bledsoe to open that duo's clear role at PG, while also adding Mudiay as a 3rd PG who still has potential to live up to his high drafting, and adding the 13th pick on top of that, I think they would have done it regardless of what the Celtics picked.
The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: 2017 Draft 

Post#499 » by The Rebel » Fri Jun 23, 2017 4:32 pm

That is the thing that people are missing, the Suns wanted to trade Bledsoe either for their 2nd choice if Jackson did not fall to them or as part of a Porzingis trade, it takes 2 teams to trade and from all appearances it was the Suns who declined the deal.

People complaining about Lydon and Lyles really need to take a step back and think about what this team needs. You guys are right they are similar to Hernangomez, they are good or great spot up shooters who move very well off the ball and have some potential on defense. Stop and think about what this team needs from it's forwards.

IF the offense is going to run through Jokic and Plumlee with the PGs being secondary ball handlers, than we need forwards that can get open and move around the court to get good shots and open up passing lanes. That is why guys like Faried and Harris excel in our system while Chandler was left bitching and moaning. When your ball distributor is not moving around like a PG does, then your guys have to do the moving. These guys have potential to be good fits long term and if you look at the way the Nuggets have always drafted they draft a couple of very similar players and let them compete.

If you look at the numbers just going from Nelson to Murray and Mudiay will improve the defense considerably next season. Now we still need more defenders, but I have always felt that was coming from free agency.

Think about this, if they get 2 guys like Ingles and Millsap while removing Faried and Arthur, would you say that the team improved their defense and built around Jokic? I would be thrilled with a team like that. We were not drafting for the short term last night, if we were that would be stupid, and while it did not work out perfect I am fine with the way things went last night although I am still pissed that Portland used our pick with their own to move up and get Collins and the Spurs got White but that is for another post.
Powder Blue
Analyst
Posts: 3,444
And1: 642
Joined: Dec 28, 2004
   

Re: 2017 Draft 

Post#500 » by Powder Blue » Fri Jun 23, 2017 4:45 pm

The Rebel wrote:That is the thing that people are missing, the Suns wanted to trade Bledsoe either for their 2nd choice if Jackson did not fall to them or as part of a Porzingis trade, it takes 2 teams to trade and from all appearances it was the Suns who declined the deal.

People complaining about Lydon and Lyles really need to take a step back and think about what this team needs. You guys are right they are similar to Hernangomez, they are good or great spot up shooters who move very well off the ball and have some potential on defense. Stop and think about what this team needs from it's forwards.

IF the offense is going to run through Jokic and Plumlee with the PGs being secondary ball handlers, than we need forwards that can get open and move around the court to get good shots and open up passing lanes. That is why guys like Faried and Harris excel in our system while Chandler was left bitching and moaning. When your ball distributor is not moving around like a PG does, then your guys have to do the moving. These guys have potential to be good fits long term and if you look at the way the Nuggets have always drafted they draft a couple of very similar players and let them compete.

If you look at the numbers just going from Nelson to Murray and Mudiay will improve the defense considerably next season. Now we still need more defenders, but I have always felt that was coming from free agency.

Think about this, if they get 2 guys like Ingles and Millsap while removing Faried and Arthur, would you say that the team improved their defense and built around Jokic? I would be thrilled with a team like that. We were not drafting for the short term last night, if we were that would be stupid, and while it did not work out perfect I am fine with the way things went last night although I am still pissed that Portland used our pick with their own to move up and get Collins and the Spurs got White but that is for another post.


You think Lyles and Lydon addressed a team need? I don't see it that way, just adds to the overcrowded roster. As it stands now they won't even see consistent minutes this season. Nevermind what the Nuggets "might" do, cause sadly they never do anything you suggest.

Return to Denver Nuggets