eathb_au wrote:Nope he's right.
I reserve the right to believe you are both wrong.
eathb_au wrote:The offense was basically everyone stand still and watch Andre Miller pound the ball for 20 seconds...
I must be wrong because I cannot tell you how many times I've seen almost the exact same quote, with the exact same seconds. First I thought that "Miller Bashers Anonymous" put out a pamphlet of "talking points". I must be biased, though, because he's never seemed to me to be dribbling without purpose, or taking longer than any good floor general in finding the best option. And I know it's not directly on point, but he also has the second lowest usage rate in the rotation.
eathb_au wrote:...and really Miller this season is perhaps the worst defender I have ever seen.
I've heard that. But Hollinger has him with the second lowest (best) opponent production rate (to Iguodala) on the team. To add to my quandary, he also has the fourth best own/opponent differential behind McGee, Faried, and Iguodala. And I know he guards much better scorers, so I wonder how much he really hurts on defense, even though that is admittedly not a particular strength IMO.
eathb_au wrote:It's why I was against re-signing him. For starters he's a George Karl player...
That is a big point on this board, where coach is made to sound like the second coming of the infamous Papa Doc. But I felt less stupid after listening to that panel of ex-stars in the OKC game I watched on NBA TV. They said he was a proven exceptional coach and ranked him somewhere just after Pops and Doc. I agree, although I do value your opinions also.
eathb_au wrote:...and secondly he's a damn terrible PG to play two PG with Lawson since he doesn't compliment him at all.
I disagree. But that is based only on my observations and opinion.
eathb_au wrote: And thirdly this is not a half court team and he needs to stop playing like its a half court offense.
He's hardly a speedster like Lawson. But he compensates by being one of the best 3/4 court, and all around great, passers, who, I believe, is hardly a fast break killer. I think observation and the team record proves that. And I am sure you are not naive enough to believe that even Denver is able to fast break on every possession. His skill in the half court setting could be seen by some as a plus, particularly come playoff time.
eathb_au wrote:Oh and he's among the bottom 5 in the league in clutch time stats this season which is pretty bad coming from a vet, especially when Gallo ranks in the top 5.
That may seem important, but is it? The creator of "clutch time stats" explains that the number of shots taken is important to the formula. Dre takes 7.5 shots in a whole 48 minute game. He has always been a passer who is more an opportunistic scorer than great or prolific shooter.
But that is what Ty and Gallo are for. They take respectively 13.6 and 12.5 shots per, and are purer shooters, particularly Danilo.
But having said that, I believe Dre is one of the most clutch players I've seen, and one with the most indomitable will to win. He defers to shooters, but should be on the court in crunch time. When "nothing is there" he can create a shot with a good chance of going in. There is, also, no one on the team I prefer to see shooting fouls at the end of games.