RealGM

I was wondering what would it take to get Jan Vessely? We could offer Wright + Mekel + James for Vessely + Foye/Filler

or

We could do Crowder + James + Mekel for Jan V.

or

We could do Mekel + James + Cash or our Exemption for Jan V.

Vesely isn't U/C, just sign him....

skywalker33 wrote:Vesely isn't U/C, just sign him....

Why does it show him as on your team with trade machine?

Not sure why you want him but he signed with a team in Turkey so his NBA career is most likely over.

We want him because he is a 7 footer that's > James. We want to improve our back C position

Nash/Cash/Hou 1st/future 2nd for Chandler?

I would do it if Nash wasn't so injury prone. He's a guy we could use in a half court situation but his back will limit him to only play half the season.

Is Thad Young & Shane Larkin fair value for Danilo Gallinari?

DowNY wrote:Is Thad Young & Shane Larkin fair value for Danilo Gallinari?

NO !! Add in PHI's unprotected 2015 #1 and we'll talk....

skywalker33 wrote:

DowNY wrote:Is Thad Young & Shane Larkin fair value for Danilo Gallinari?

NO !! Add in PHI's unprotected 2015 #1 and we'll talk....

Are those guys fair value for Wilson Chandler then?

Value wise, I don't think it's far off but it doesn't work for our current roster. We don't need more depth. We need to consolidate talent.

What is Mosgovs situation? Is he expendable or is JJ?

kbrow20 wrote:What is Mosgovs situation? Is he expendable or is JJ?

Mozgov probably not.

JJ, I would accept anything but a worse contract for him at this point.

eathb_au wrote:

kbrow20 wrote:What is Mosgovs situation? Is he expendable or is JJ?

Mozgov probably not.

JJ, I would accept anything but a worse contract for him at this point.

Is JJ not have good defense? He doesn't have that many blocks per game. Does he do quite well for being 6'9 at center?

Hi guys.

Mozgov - would an offer of non-guaranteed contracts (i.e. cap space) and a reverse protected Memphis pick (1-5 and 15-30 protected the next two years) or top-10 protected MIA pick be enough to reunite him with David Blatt?

I assume that with McGee returning and the drafting of Nurkic he is somewhat surplus to requirements - is this an appropriate value?

AustinCarr61 wrote:Hi guys.

Mozgov - would an offer of non-guaranteed contracts (i.e. cap space) and a reverse protected Memphis pick (1-5 and 15-30 protected the next two years) or top-10 protected MIA pick be enough to reunite him with David Blatt?

I assume that with McGee returning and the drafting of Nurkic he is somewhat surplus to requirements - is this an appropriate value?

You are assuming wrong, Mozgov is the starting center until McGee or Nurkic can unseat him, and Nurkic right now is seen as a project a year or two away from being a good NBA player. No I am not going to trade him for mid 1st, especially 1 likely to be a couple of years away at the soonest.

kbrow20 wrote:

eathb_au wrote:

kbrow20 wrote:What is Mosgovs situation? Is he expendable or is JJ?

Mozgov probably not.

JJ, I would accept anything but a worse contract for him at this point.

Is JJ not have good defense? He doesn't have that many blocks per game. Does he do quite well for being 6'9 at center?

Hickson is above average at man to man post defense, but terrible at help defense and defense on the perimeter.

The Rebel wrote:

AustinCarr61 wrote:Hi guys.

Mozgov - would an offer of non-guaranteed contracts (i.e. cap space) and a reverse protected Memphis pick (1-5 and 15-30 protected the next two years) or top-10 protected MIA pick be enough to reunite him with David Blatt?

I assume that with McGee returning and the drafting of Nurkic he is somewhat surplus to requirements - is this an appropriate value?

You are assuming wrong, Mozgov is the starting center until McGee or Nurkic can unseat him, and Nurkic right now is seen as a project a year or two away from being a good NBA player. No I am not going to trade him for mid 1st, especially 1 likely to be a couple of years away at the soonest.

Ok - thanks for the clarification.

tstrick33 wrote:I would do it if Nash wasn't so injury prone. He's a guy we could use in a half court situation but his back will limit him to only play half the season.

Nash wouldn't be seen as contributing asset, best case you guys use him same way we did, use him to match salary and either take back longer contracts with assets or trade him for similar contract of a disgruntled "star" player who wants to go elsewhere. OR worse case, he settles for a decent buyout and you guys can use the money on some one else.

Would you guys consider JJ + Foye for Wright + Mekel + pick

Yes I would do that