We would have made that trade for Artest? Looking at the matchups with the Lakers, I don't see how we win. Not saying it will be a sweep or antyhing, I just don't see a win.
On the other hand, if we had Artest to cover Kobe, I really think we could pull it off. I was actually for keeping Kleiza at the time, but I'm not so sure anymore. Hopefully Kleiza doesn't pull another disappearing act, or we'll really be kicking ourseleves.
Anyone Else Wishing . . .
Moderator: THE J0KER
Anyone Else Wishing . . .
-
manchambo
- Starter
- Posts: 2,314
- And1: 836
- Joined: Nov 12, 2004
-
eathy
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,707
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 01, 2007
yes.
it was a stupid decision to keep LK because of his potential... because he doesn't have much potential at all, and also for Artest... it was a god dam steal.
stupid GMs.
granted, we would've been at least top 4 seed in the West, and would've won the division title.
rotations would've been something like this:
C - MC / Hunter / Nene
PF - K-Mart / Nene / Hunter
SF - Melo / Artest / JR
SG - Artest / JR / Chucky
PG - AI / AC / Chucky
championship. they better get him during the offseason along with Larry Brown.
it was a stupid decision to keep LK because of his potential... because he doesn't have much potential at all, and also for Artest... it was a god dam steal.
stupid GMs.
granted, we would've been at least top 4 seed in the West, and would've won the division title.
rotations would've been something like this:
C - MC / Hunter / Nene
PF - K-Mart / Nene / Hunter
SF - Melo / Artest / JR
SG - Artest / JR / Chucky
PG - AI / AC / Chucky
championship. they better get him during the offseason along with Larry Brown.
-
corona
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 15,940
- And1: 234
- Joined: Apr 29, 2006