Page 1 of 4
Game 71: Denver (47-23) @ New York (25-45)
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:49 am
by SnakefromHell
@
March 23, 2010 5:30 MT Madison Square Garden








Hot Chick Game Thread Appearances:Megan Fox: 6-1 (.857)
Blake Lively: 5-1 (.833)
Carrie Underwood 6-3 (.667)
Miranda Kerr 4-2 (.667)
Adriana Lima 4-2 (.667)
Scarlett Johansson 4-2 (.667)
Shandi Finnessey 3-2 (.600)
Rihanna 3-3 (.500)
Federica Ridolfi 2-3 (.400)
shandi & federica are a game behind the rest of the roster. need to get them back on track.

Re: Game 71: Denver (47-23) @ New York (25-45)
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 5:58 am
by Nutty Nats Fan
Yeah, lets keep farking up the whole hot chick list.
Wouldn't expect anything less from Snake though.
But thanks for putting the time in and creating the thread.

Re: Game 71: Denver (47-23) @ New York (25-45)
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 5:24 pm
by pickaxe
Idk man Snake's got something fresh here. Let's see what happens.
Re: Game 71: Denver (47-23) @ New York (25-45)
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:29 pm
by Nutty Nats Fan
meloivynene wrote:Idk man Snake's got something fresh here. Let's see what happens.
I thought the whole idea was to have the girls all have about the same amount of games "played" and have a few for the playoffs or an overall winner. This junk with new girls, completely defeats that purpose.
Re: Game 71: Denver (47-23) @ New York (25-45)
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:49 pm
by SnakefromHell
Ty is back everyone!!
It hasn't been the most advertised move of the last few days for the Nuggets, but Ty Lawson is available for game action.
http://www.denverpost.com/nuggets/ci_14727673
Re: Game 71: Denver (47-23) @ New York (25-45)
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:26 pm
by el loco
He was available for the last game, but didn't get any minutes.
Re: Game 71: Denver (47-23) @ New York (25-45)
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 11:23 pm
by KAVK
Nutty Nats Fan wrote:meloivynene wrote:Idk man Snake's got something fresh here. Let's see what happens.
I thought the whole idea was to have the girls all have about the same amount of games "played" and have a few for the playoffs or an overall winner. This junk with new girls, completely defeats that purpose.
Hope Ty will play tonight. But don't wanna push him too soon.
Hot Chick thing is f ed up! Now we are like LA board bunch of sissies bringing in random chicks on every game thread. WE HAD A CLASSY CHICKS LIST. Now it is all random junkies.
Re: Game 71: Denver (47-23) @ New York (25-45)
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 12:20 am
by MHZ
I only have BlackBerry access this week. No game threads from me. Nice to see our game thread idea is just done I guess.
Re: Game 71: Denver (47-23) @ New York (25-45)
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 12:41 am
by corona
I only have BlackBerry access this week. No game threads from me. Nice to see our game thread idea is just done I guess.
Hot Chick thing is f ed up! Now we are like LA board bunch of sissies bringing in random chicks on every game thread. WE HAD A CLASSY CHICKS LIST. Now it is all random junkies.
snake ruins everything he touches.
will do some editing and get this mess straightened out.
and that list pic looks like a 12 year old.
we're not the pedo board.
Re: Game 71: Denver (47-23) @ New York (25-45)
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:52 am
by SnakefromHell
Guys who cares about classic?
Pretty faces and their prominence in the women world rule... they're the superstars/ rising superstars of women now.

That original "classic" list is full of has-beens like Grant Hills (except for Vonn who is not a has been, she has never been lol), some nights we're OK, some nights we were losing against sub .500 teams. But we're not shooting for OK, we're shooting for the stars/ the championship.
If the girls I bring here belong to "12 yr old"/ junkies, I guess I'd rather be a 12 yr old/ junky rather than be "classy" and losing games we're not supposed to lose anyway

el loco wrote:He was available for the last game, but didn't get any minutes.
How come before the Bucks game this news didn't come out... I know he was in uniform but I don't think he was available in the last game.
Re: Game 71: Denver (47-23) @ New York (25-45)
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 2:13 am
by KAVK
Dalllas losing..... BUT WE GOTTA KEEP WINNING.
We need to VOTE to resolve matters like these. We need everyone's opinion not just couple of us. How about we start voting on chicks to stay for Playoffs while we got nuts on the chicks for the rest of the season? IDEAS?
This SNAKE is just getting out of the hands here

Re: Game 71: Denver (47-23) @ New York (25-45)
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 2:28 am
by SnakefromHell
^Believe me I'm just getting started

the best chics are yet to come. But I <3 Leah
YEssssssssssssssssss Mavs keep losing, we need to take advantage!
Re: Game 71: Denver (47-23) @ New York (25-45)
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 3:30 am
by Teens On Acid
stick to the original list...
Re: Game 71: Denver (47-23) @ New York (25-45)
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 3:55 am
by KAVK
I would vote to stick to the original list
Re: Game 71: Denver (47-23) @ New York (25-45)
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 4:17 am
by Carmelo22
Mod clean this up please?
We should stick to the original girls idea. Since thats what the majority of us want
Re: Game 71: Denver (47-23) @ New York (25-45)
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 5:54 am
by corona
snake....just stick to the layout.
there's plenty of other forums on the internet where you can drool over 12 year olds.
Re: Game 71: Denver (47-23) @ New York (25-45)
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 6:30 am
by SnakefromHell
My girls....

they're gone....
!!!
I love Shandy, Kerr, Fox, Ridolfi... but the rest are why we've lost 10 games to garbage teams.
Can't I have my section of girls?

Re: Game 71: Denver (47-23) @ New York (25-45)
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 8:47 am
by pickaxe
Nutty Nats Fan wrote:meloivynene wrote:Idk man Snake's got something fresh here. Let's see what happens.
I thought the whole idea was to have the girls all have about the same amount of games "played" and have a few for the playoffs or an overall winner. This junk with new girls, completely defeats that purpose.
That's why I put the caveat "Let's see what happens" .... lol, thumbs down! Sorry snake.
I think I liked Snake's idea for a pre-game video/music widget. That's a little extra I don't think ppl would mind. Just throwing it out there. Let's see what happens.

Re: Game 71: Denver (47-23) @ New York (25-45)
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 3:29 pm
by Vapnugs
Nuggets need to serious and need to win tonight against the erratic Knicks. I agree with Jay that we need Ty to return to the lineup.
Re: Game 71: Denver (47-23) @ New York (25-45)
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 3:55 pm
by SnakefromHell
^I think pregame/ warmup iPod is cool, considering players do that in their lockerroom, bus, etc...

Nuggets are still the most important thing tho, girls take a backseat.
What I don't get is you guys choose the Home & Gardens/ cooking magazine cover girls rather than the real deal/ hotness. That's equivalent to choosing Lamar Odoms instead of Carmelo Anthonys.
And corona, Ms Dizon is 24 yrs old, born in Nevada, USA of Chinese-French hybrid (which is why she's not this completely mysterious international Asian chic... I thought you Americans should know ur girls better?) before taking a career in Japan. She's as fine as they come. I can't understand you guys prefer to see Lindsey "40 yrs old
masculine face/ Arvydas Sabonis would be proud someone has a head as huge as his" Vonn than her... ?? I'll take some 24 yr old looking like a teen, than 26 yr old looking like 40. Any day. I mean she might be classy, but cmon guys... we can find "classy" that goes hand in hand with "pretty" or "elite".
>
It's not too late to change your taste

There are still 12 games left
