If the MLB were to grant an expansion franchise...

Moderator: TyCobb

HDMAVS760CA
Senior
Posts: 668
And1: 31
Joined: May 13, 2006
Location: ONTARIO, CA
       

 

Post#41 » by HDMAVS760CA » Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:17 pm

Posey H8er wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I think Las Vegas baseball would be a complete failure.

Hey, they can't do any worse than DC which failed thrice, & the 2 baseball teams in Florida. Besides, there don't need 2 be anymore expansion in baseball. Contraction is what baseball needs. Vegas should be the place if there was gonna be anymore expansion or relocation. Portland, if that's gonna happen they'll need a dome. I remember someone saying years ago that Portland would be another Tampa Bay situation.
HDMAVS760CA
Senior
Posts: 668
And1: 31
Joined: May 13, 2006
Location: ONTARIO, CA
       

 

Post#42 » by HDMAVS760CA » Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:28 pm

34Celtic wrote:I'd like to see how many fans Tampa would draw if they were actually good...

Most likely the same as they do normally. There was a year when the D.Rays actually impersonated a legitimate MLB team & had a good period of winning in the summer, even had a winning interleague record for the 1st time ever & the fans still didn't show up. The best chance 4 them selling out is that they play all their games in Orlando like they did some games in the 2007 season.
Year i'm referring to was between 2004 & 2006.
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

 

Post#43 » by WEFFPIM » Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:35 pm

HDMAVS760CA wrote:Most likely the same as they do normally. There was a year when the D.Rays actually impersonated a legitimate MLB team & had a good period of winning in the summer, even had a winning interleague record for the 1st time ever & the fans still didn't show up. The best chance 4 them selling out is that they play all their games in Orlando like they did some games in the 2007 season.
Year i'm referring to was between 2004 & 2006.


Completely disagree. That's a city with diehard fans if there's a team worth watching. After championships for both the Buccaneers and the Lightning, they sell out every game.

Hate to break it to you, but interleague play doesn't draw out too many more people. When they had something like 10 straight interleague wins a few years back, all on the road, almost 40,000 people showed up to their first game at home. If that team starts winning, I have no doubt in my mind that Tampa will come out and see them. But after what they have been for pretty much their entire duration, who would want to rush out to go see them?

And what's to say that if the team ever moved to Orlando (which they won't), why would the people of Orlando stick with them? If the team is bad, no one will show up no matter where the team is located.
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
HDMAVS760CA
Senior
Posts: 668
And1: 31
Joined: May 13, 2006
Location: ONTARIO, CA
       

 

Post#44 » by HDMAVS760CA » Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:50 pm

willeatfire4playoffsinmil wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Completely disagree. That's a city with diehard fans if there's a team worth watching. After championships for both the Buccaneers and the Lightning, they sell out every game.

And what's to say that if the team ever moved to Orlando (which they won't), why would the people of Orlando stick with them? If the team is bad, no one will show up no matter where the team is located.

I didn't say they would move to Orlando. I heard that the capacity is about 10,000 or less & they average under 20,000 a game in T.Bay. Every place has a big attendance on opening day in baseball. And the Lightning....they don't sell the place out anymore. And they were the only southern NHL team 2 do so.
34Celtic
Analyst
Posts: 3,406
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2007

 

Post#45 » by 34Celtic » Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:13 am

I can't believe there is hockey in Tampa Bay but not Connecticut...
HCYanks wrote:Thanks for reminding me Clay Buchholz is a couple of blocks away from me, Fox. Now I have to go hide my laptop.
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

 

Post#46 » by SportsWorld » Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:43 am

HDMAVS760CA wrote: Portland, if that's gonna happen they'll need a dome.

Why would they need a dome?
User avatar
greenbeans
RealGM
Posts: 60,137
And1: 14,154
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
     

 

Post#47 » by greenbeans » Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:46 am

SportsWorld wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


Why would they need a dome?

it rains crazy like 180 days out of the year or something like that
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

 

Post#48 » by WEFFPIM » Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:06 am

HDMAVS760CA wrote:I didn't say they would move to Orlando. I heard that the capacity is about 10,000 or less & they average under 20,000 a game in T.Bay. Every place has a big attendance on opening day in baseball. And the Lightning....they don't sell the place out anymore. And they were the only southern NHL team 2 do so.


They operate at 95% capacity, and draw more than hockey hot beds like Minnesota, NY Rangers, and Detroit. And I don't see how their location has anything to do with that. Carolina won the Stanley Cup two seasons ago and failed to sellout.

And no one mentioned Opening Day.
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

 

Post#49 » by SportsWorld » Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:12 am

greenbeans wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


it rains crazy like 180 days out of the year or something like that

http://www.city-data.com/city/Portland-Oregon.html
studcrackers
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 52,226
And1: 6,100
Joined: Oct 31, 2004
Location: Getting hit in the head
         

 

Post#50 » by studcrackers » Wed Dec 12, 2007 2:41 am

how did u become a mod spamming all over the place like that, you're a joke little boy
Jugs wrote: I saw two buttholes
ldnk
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,905
And1: 3,522
Joined: Feb 17, 2007

 

Post#51 » by ldnk » Wed Dec 12, 2007 6:42 am

bigboy1234 wrote:How many teams have won 2 or more World Series in the past 11 years? Let's see theres the Yankees, Red Sox, and Marlins.

I would say what they are doing is working. Being stuck in mediocrity is not fun, I'm sure there are a few fans here who have gone through that.

The Marlins will never ever be a big market team, they have a small window and when they realize they aren't going to win in that window they rebuild. Some other teams could actually learn from them.

Edit-Ah, maybe you guys were saying how the fans suck.


A big difference between awful ownership and good management. The scouting staff in Florida is top notch, but the fans don't come out because they don't have a team to root for. Any time a player gets good enough to be a fan favourite, he is traded away because he would cost money. Sure they won two World Series titles, and then they unloaded the team by the very next year. Hard to fall in love with Championship teams when they aren't even around the appreciate past the winning moment.

Imagine if a team like the Red Sox started trading away guys like Papelbon because "they were due for arbitration".
User avatar
VinnyTheMick
RealGM
Posts: 13,843
And1: 5
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Getting wasted with Ron Swanson.
Contact:

 

Post#52 » by VinnyTheMick » Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:08 pm

ldnk wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


Imagine if a team like the Red Sox started trading away guys like Papelbon because "they were due for arbitration".


I'd be happy.
http://www.nyccan.org/
Ask questions. Demand answers.
A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth.- Albert Einstein
User avatar
greenbeans
RealGM
Posts: 60,137
And1: 14,154
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
     

 

Post#53 » by greenbeans » Wed Dec 12, 2007 8:31 pm

SportsWorld wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


http://www.city-data.com/city/Portland-Oregon.html
im not trying to do a book report on the city, thanks though
Tom Chambers
Banned User
Posts: 2,274
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 08, 2004

 

Post#54 » by Tom Chambers » Fri Dec 14, 2007 1:13 am

greenbeans wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

im not trying to do a book report on the city, thanks though


Well allow me then. It doesn't rain very much at all in the summer, most of the rain is in the winter.
User avatar
greenbeans
RealGM
Posts: 60,137
And1: 14,154
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
     

 

Post#55 » by greenbeans » Fri Dec 14, 2007 1:36 am

Tom Chambers wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Well allow me then. It doesn't rain very much at all in the summer, most of the rain is in the winter.


really? weird. when i go out there it usually rains 10-12 out of the 14 days im there and i usually go in spring
User avatar
Dirty Water
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,785
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 29, 2005
Location: The future

 

Post#56 » by Dirty Water » Wed Dec 26, 2007 8:01 pm

Unless they would do continuous interleague play throughout the season, which I highly doubt the MLB would do - this won't happen. In order to balance the leagues, they'd need two new AL teams. The way "3-game series" works is that they need even amount of teams in American and National Leagues. Although baseball will never get rid of interleague play because of the revenue and rivalries it brings, there is growing resentment about how fair the scheduling is (brought up this year by a few ballclubs.) Continuous interleague play would only increase this resentment.

And I don't think they are ready to do that. I'd see contraction is more plausible than expansion for the MLB at this point.
User avatar
High 5
RealGM
Posts: 15,655
And1: 2,183
Joined: Apr 21, 2006

 

Post#57 » by High 5 » Thu Dec 27, 2007 3:19 am

If Seattle doesn't need a dome, Portland wouldn't need a dome.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,675
And1: 27,265
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#58 » by trwi7 » Thu Dec 27, 2007 5:32 am

High 5 wrote:If Seattle doesn't need a dome, Portland wouldn't need a dome.


Seattle has a retractable roof.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
High 5
RealGM
Posts: 15,655
And1: 2,183
Joined: Apr 21, 2006

 

Post#59 » by High 5 » Thu Dec 27, 2007 6:56 pm

trwi7 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Seattle has a retractable roof.


For real? I never knew that.
User avatar
TSC25
Veteran
Posts: 2,549
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 08, 2004
Location: Indianapolis

 

Post#60 » by TSC25 » Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:45 pm

I could see both good and bad reasons why a team should be put in Vegas,and I'd say Oklahoma City seems to be a hot topic for NBA teams so why not with MLB also.

Return to The General MLB Board