Dumpster thinks Cubs will end drought, take World Series
Moderator: TyCobb
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 52,226
- And1: 6,100
- Joined: Oct 31, 2004
- Location: Getting hit in the head
-
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,487
- And1: 0
- Joined: Apr 18, 2007
- UrbanLegendMD
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,716
- And1: 11
- Joined: Jul 30, 2004
- Location: Pilsen
Posey H8er wrote:Wrigleyville is in Chicago in case you did not know.
And bastion of whiteness it is. White Sox is the real Chicago team.
First the federal government borrowed money; then gave the money to Bank of America; then I borrowed some of that money from Bank of America and gave it to the federal government; then the federal government gave the money back to Bank of America.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 51,601
- And1: 133
- Joined: Dec 03, 2006
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
-
NurbekIL wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
And bastion of whiteness it is. White Sox is the real Chicago team.
If you think the Sox have more fans than the Cubs you are crazy.
Attendence
2001:
Cubs: 10th in league averaging 35,183 fans
White Sox: 26th in league averaging 22,077 fans
2002:
Cubs: 8th in league averaging 34,526 fans
White Sox: 23rd in league averaging 20,702 fans
2003:
Cubs: 6th in league averaging 37,032 fans
White Sox: 21st in league averaging 23,944 fans
2004:
Cubs: 6th in league averaging 39,138 fans
White Sox: 21st in league averaging 24,437 fans
2005:
Cubs: 6th in league averaging 38,753 fans
White Sox: 17th in league averaging 28,923 fans (And they won a WS)
2006:
Cubs: 6th in league averaging 39,040 fans (And they had one of the worst records in the league)
White Sox: 9th in league averaging 36,511 fans (World Series hangover)
2007:
Cubs: 6th in league averaging 40,153 fans
White Sox: 15th in league averaging 33,140 fans
White Sox are clearly Chicago's team
- UrbanLegendMD
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,716
- And1: 11
- Joined: Jul 30, 2004
- Location: Pilsen
Rich businessmen and their kids from northern suburbs do not count as people from Chicago. White Sox may not be leading the league in attendance, but their fans are blue collar, hard working Americans, and that's exactly what Chicago stands for.
First the federal government borrowed money; then gave the money to Bank of America; then I borrowed some of that money from Bank of America and gave it to the federal government; then the federal government gave the money back to Bank of America.
- UrbanLegendMD
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,716
- And1: 11
- Joined: Jul 30, 2004
- Location: Pilsen
SportsWorld wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Please tell me you are kidding
I may be, but it doesn't change the fact that Cubs are not very good.
First the federal government borrowed money; then gave the money to Bank of America; then I borrowed some of that money from Bank of America and gave it to the federal government; then the federal government gave the money back to Bank of America.
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,675
- And1: 27,265
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
NurbekIL wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I may be, but it doesn't change the fact that Cubs are not very good.
Neither are the White Sox now everybody shut up.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
- UrbanLegendMD
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,716
- And1: 11
- Joined: Jul 30, 2004
- Location: Pilsen
trwi7 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Neither are the White Sox now everybody shut up.
At least they won this century, so they have something to be proud of. You are right though. No reason to hate on your fellow neighbor for making a poor choice of sports allegiance.
First the federal government borrowed money; then gave the money to Bank of America; then I borrowed some of that money from Bank of America and gave it to the federal government; then the federal government gave the money back to Bank of America.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,122
- And1: 1,828
- Joined: May 30, 2003
-
SportsWorld wrote:NurbekIL wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
And bastion of whiteness it is. White Sox is the real Chicago team.
If you think the Sox have more fans than the Cubs you are crazy.
Attendence
2001:
Cubs: 10th in league averaging 35,183 fans
White Sox: 26th in league averaging 22,077 fans
2002:
Cubs: 8th in league averaging 34,526 fans
White Sox: 23rd in league averaging 20,702 fans
2003:
Cubs: 6th in league averaging 37,032 fans
White Sox: 21st in league averaging 23,944 fans
2004:
Cubs: 6th in league averaging 39,138 fans
White Sox: 21st in league averaging 24,437 fans
2005:
Cubs: 6th in league averaging 38,753 fans
White Sox: 17th in league averaging 28,923 fans (And they won a WS)
2006:
Cubs: 6th in league averaging 39,040 fans (And they had one of the worst records in the league)
White Sox: 9th in league averaging 36,511 fans (World Series hangover)
2007:
Cubs: 6th in league averaging 40,153 fans
White Sox: 15th in league averaging 33,140 fans
White Sox are clearly Chicago's team
Why don't we go back to pre-ppv channel for White Sox games? There was a time when the Sox dominated, and I mean dominated the market, then Jerry Reinsdorf made that mistake.
Cubs have way more worldwide fans, but the Sox own Chicago.
Return to The General MLB Board