Flash3 wrote:Because ESPN said it you are going to regurgitate it?Pharmcat wrote:Flash3 wrote:What firestorm? It came to fruition because the manager wanted to make it public and embarrass Hanley this go around.
Jason Stark in his piece from Weds outlines that this type of stuff isn't the 1st time, and that Hanley has done this more times on occasion.
That's all and dandy, this goes back to your OP; when someone as a d*** head as Hanley has acted, decides to speak up for no reason when he was clearly in the wrong is far from ownage. You really need to decipher what's going on here in general cuz you've got very little clue, at all.
the premise of the thread wasnt some1 not hustling, but rather his words to his manager, which were brutal, like i said, it wasnt just me, even espn decribed it as 'rips'
You can think for yourself, can you not? Oh, wait. You can't.
no, i was giving example of another entity using similar words to describe like i was, thats all...your first post was a agenda driven, and turned out to be a joke. i was talking bout hanleys response, NOT the incident itself, so then your second post stated that his words dont mean anything (which is false since it started a big frenzy), then your 3rd post is just a cheap shot since Ive got you backtracking...nice try
