http://wapc.mlb.com/nyy/play/?content_i ... =undefined
called a FC, but it was caught
so if the call was reversed on replay, where would the runners end up?
how would instant replay deal with this play
Moderator: TyCobb
how would instant replay deal with this play
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 56,838
- And1: 19,323
- Joined: Oct 05, 2002
Re: how would instant replay deal with this play
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,108
- And1: 628
- Joined: Apr 25, 2011
-
Re: how would instant replay deal with this play
Reminds me of Detroit v. Boston this year. One of the Bosox caught a deep fly ball, clearly caught it, but dropped it on the exchange from glove to hand, ump decides he didn't catch it.
But in the case of this play, I think they would review, see the catch was made, and if the runners didn't tag up they'd remain on their base (with the exception of the homie who was tagged at second, he was out).
But in the case of this play, I think they would review, see the catch was made, and if the runners didn't tag up they'd remain on their base (with the exception of the homie who was tagged at second, he was out).
2016 Pistons All Time Fantasy League Champ!
Re: how would instant replay deal with this play
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,674
- And1: 27,261
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: how would instant replay deal with this play
Batter is out, look at the replay to see where the runner on 3rd was when the runner on 2nd was tagged out. If a runner was tagged out before the runner on 3rd scores, it's 3 outs and no runs score. If the runner on 3rd touched home plate before another runner was tagged out the run counts but it's still 3 outs.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Return to The General MLB Board