Post#25 » by Ex-hippie » Wed Jun 27, 2007 9:18 pm
Didn't the OP say last five years? Why are people digging up things from ten years ago like the Slocumb trade? Why not just talk about Bagwell for Larry Andersen, or Babe Ruth for cash?
In the last five years, the Kazmir-Zambrano trade can't be topped. Extra credit for that one because everyone knew it was a dumb trade at the time.
I'm less inclined to dump on people who traded prospects for established veterans simply because those prospects happened to pan out. When you do one of those trades, you're trading long-term potential for short-term returns, it's a known risk, and you get what you bargained for. The team that receives these prospects is accepting a risk by exchanging known for unknown quantities. The price for taking on that risk is upside. Sometimes the upside is recognized, sometimes it isn't. I'd call those trades disasters only if the talent is completely out of proportion and the players involved are close enough to the majors to be highly projectable (like the Slocumb, Bagwell and Kazmir trades, or the Ryne Sandberg/Ivan DeJesus trade).