TyCobb wrote:I want an LA vs. LA World Series Quake!
Beltway Series or bust IMO.
Gutty 7 innings by Fister last night. Felt like a playoff game.
Moderator: TyCobb
TyCobb wrote:I want an LA vs. LA World Series Quake!
Da Schwab wrote:TyCobb wrote:I want an LA vs. LA World Series Quake!
I'd watch the crap outta that series, but it would tank in the ratings because of what Quake mentioned.
The east coast wouldn't give two sh*ts about it, even though (arguably) the two biggest stars in the sport would be front and center.
DirtyDez wrote:Why is nobody talking about the Brewers epic collapse? They've lost 12 of their last 13 games!
TyCobb wrote:Da Schwab wrote:TyCobb wrote:I want an LA vs. LA World Series Quake!
I'd watch the crap outta that series, but it would tank in the ratings because of what Quake mentioned.
The east coast wouldn't give two sh*ts about it, even though (arguably) the two biggest stars in the sport would be front and center.
I disagree. The LA market alone would kill it. The Lakers have proven this. SoCal would be buzzing.
Quake Griffin wrote:TyCobb wrote:Da Schwab wrote:
I'd watch the crap outta that series, but it would tank in the ratings because of what Quake mentioned.
The east coast wouldn't give two sh*ts about it, even though (arguably) the two biggest stars in the sport would be front and center.
I disagree. The LA market alone would kill it. The Lakers have proven this. SoCal would be buzzing.
The Lakers are a Yankees like franchise....or the Cowboys. They have fans everywhere. Kobe gets MVP chants in places you'd rarely expect to give a damn about LA.
The Dodgers, while a cornerstone franchise and having a solid attendance on the road usually, are not that franchise.
And the Angels....I mean...lol, theyre the angels. no diss but come on.
it would have to be carried by the star power of Puig and Trout. I'm not sure the east coast would give a damn at that point.
TyCobb wrote:Da Schwab wrote:TyCobb wrote:I want an LA vs. LA World Series Quake!
I'd watch the crap outta that series, but it would tank in the ratings because of what Quake mentioned.
The east coast wouldn't give two sh*ts about it, even though (arguably) the two biggest stars in the sport would be front and center.
I disagree. The LA market alone would kill it. The Lakers have proven this. SoCal would be buzzing.
TyCobb wrote:I think an LA vs. LA World Series would have the most viewers since the 2004 WS.
Da Schwab wrote:TyCobb wrote:I think an LA vs. LA World Series would have the most viewers since the 2004 WS.
Don't get me wrong, it deserves to. Like I said, it'd be a matchup of arguably the two best players in the league, but I don't think it'd draw that much attention on the east coast.
I'm just hoping we don't draw dead with some crappy series like Cards/Tigers.
dockingsched wrote:so glad cp3 took the timeout, couldn't take seeing the lakers scored on 4 on 5.
TheMidnightSun wrote:damn the angels are really running away with their division, could be the first time the franchise gets 100 wins
TyCobb wrote:Quake Griffin wrote:TyCobb wrote:
I disagree. The LA market alone would kill it. The Lakers have proven this. SoCal would be buzzing.
The Lakers are a Yankees like franchise....or the Cowboys. They have fans everywhere. Kobe gets MVP chants in places you'd rarely expect to give a damn about LA.
The Dodgers, while a cornerstone franchise and having a solid attendance on the road usually, are not that franchise.
And the Angels....I mean...lol, theyre the angels. no diss but come on.
it would have to be carried by the star power of Puig and Trout. I'm not sure the east coast would give a damn at that point.
And im saying the SoCal market would make the east coast viewers moot. Dont underestimate that bandwagon population of SoCal.
DirtyDez wrote:Why is nobody talking about the Brewers epic collapse? They've lost 12 of their last 13 games!
RoyalMajesty wrote:TheMidnightSun wrote:damn the angels are really running away with their division, could be the first time the franchise gets 100 wins
It's pretty pathetic with their payroll they can't win 100 games![]()
I would love to see what Billy Beane can do with some of their money.
Jugs wrote: I saw two buttholes
RoyalMajesty wrote:TheMidnightSun wrote:damn the angels are really running away with their division, could be the first time the franchise gets 100 wins
It's pretty pathetic with their payroll they can't win 100 games![]()
I would love to see what Billy Beane can do with some of their money.
Return to The General MLB Board