2014 MLB Playoffs Thread

Post #761 » by **Slava** » Sun Oct 12, 2014 2:52 am

7th inning luck again?

Post #762 » by **Slava** » Sun Oct 12, 2014 2:54 am

Isn't that impeding progress of the runner?

RIPskaterdude · Post #763 » by **RIPskaterdude** » Sun Oct 12, 2014 2:55 am

NAH HE TAGGED HIM FIRST, IF HE RAN INTO HIM DIRECTLY THEN YES

TheKingofSting · Post #764 » by **TheKingofSting** » Sun Oct 12, 2014 2:58 am

I think so.

RIPskaterdude · Post #765 » by **RIPskaterdude** » Sun Oct 12, 2014 3:00 am

WOW THAT WAS A BALK BUT BUM GOT OUT OF IT

Post #766 » by **studcrackers** » Sun Oct 12, 2014 3:00 am

How was that balk uncalled?

RIPskaterdude · Post #767 » by **RIPskaterdude** » Sun Oct 12, 2014 3:01 am

ITS POSSIBLE POSEY CALLED TIME NO IDEA

Catchall · Post #768 » by **Catchall** » Sun Oct 12, 2014 3:08 am

The Giants just don't give up many runs these days.

Post #769 » by **Geddy** » Sun Oct 12, 2014 3:09 am

RIPskaterdude wrote:ITS POSSIBLE POSEY CALLED TIME NO IDEA

Your capslock is broken

Quake Griffin · Post #770 » by **Quake Griffin** » Sun Oct 12, 2014 3:11 am

Bumgarner pitched better than Kershaw.

Post #771 » by **Stanford** » Sun Oct 12, 2014 3:13 am

Quake Griffin wrote:Bumgarner pitched better than Kershaw.

OBVIOUSLY.

Post #772 » by **Stanford** » Sun Oct 12, 2014 3:14 am

Slava wrote:Isn't that impeding progress of the runner?

No, it's called tagging the runner. It counts as an out.

Catchall · Post #773 » by **Catchall** » Sun Oct 12, 2014 3:19 am

Bumgarner is having a really nice post-season, with the exception of that weird throw-away in Game 3 v. the Nats. Otherwise, it's all shut-out.

Post #774 » by **Slava** » Sun Oct 12, 2014 3:27 am

Stanford wrote:
Slava wrote:Isn't that impeding progress of the runner?

No, it's called tagging the runner. It counts as an out.

Oh, didn't know that.

El Turco · Post #775 » by **El Turco** » Sun Oct 12, 2014 3:27 am

Geddy wrote:
RIPskaterdude wrote:ITS POSSIBLE POSEY CALLED TIME NO IDEA

Your capslock is broken

^NOT IN THE KNOW

El Turco · Post #776 » by **El Turco** » Sun Oct 12, 2014 3:31 am

since when kershaw is the gold standard of playoff pitching?

RIPskaterdude · Post #777 » by **RIPskaterdude** » Sun Oct 12, 2014 3:39 am

El Turco wrote:since when kershaw is the gold standard of playoff pitching?

blazza18 · Post #778 » by **blazza18** » Sun Oct 12, 2014 3:57 am

I love Bum.

Post #779 » by **Da Schwab** » Sun Oct 12, 2014 1:49 pm

I still can't get over how amazing this Royals team is playing right now. They just never seem to have a moment where they get flustered while they're down.

Part of that may be because they're the ultimate underdog right now, part of it could be that they're winning despite having an awful manager.

Quake Griffin · Post #780 » by **Quake Griffin** » Sun Oct 12, 2014 3:52 pm

Giants look setup nice for a sweep imo.

they're not scared of the Cards and have a competent manager, so the Cardinals offense is bout to be the offense we've all known it to be over the course of the season.

if the Giants do that, maybe I can get a new manager in Los Angeles. MAYBE.
So Giants....either win big or just don't win at all...i mean at all.

thanks a ton.