Page 1 of 1
technicality costs LAD the game?
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:33 am
by Pharmcat
sure mattingly messed up, but the umps erred too and had LAD protested, game couldve been replayed
fail on LAD part for not knowing the rules
first the incident
http://losangeles.dodgers.mlb.com/news/ ... sp&c_id=lathen why the umps erred
http://sports.espn.go.com/los-angeles/m ... id=5399491
Re: technicality costs LAD the game?
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:45 am
by craig01
Bizarre.
Lesson(s) learned.
Re: technicality costs LAD the game?
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 2:21 pm
by Bay_Areas_Finest
So stupid. You can bend the rules. It's not as if Mattingly walked all the way to the dugout or even the chalk and then came back. He was talking to his f'ing infielder.
Bochy is an idiot.
Re: technicality costs LAD the game?
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 12:14 am
by craig01
Bay_Areas_Finest wrote:So stupid. You can bend the rules. It's not as if Mattingly walked all the way to the dugout or even the chalk and then came back. He was talking to his f'ing infielder.
Bochy is an idiot.
Pretty smart really...LOL
Re: technicality costs LAD the game?
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:03 pm
by Stanford
'Cost LAD the game' is pushing it don't you think? Broxton had loaded the bases already, and Torres hits far better against RHP than LHP.
Re: technicality costs LAD the game?
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:11 am
by Gremz
I'm with Stanford on this one, pretty much because I know nothing about baseball and his pokemon sig is the least annoying.
Re: technicality costs LAD the game?
Posted: Thu Aug 5, 2010 6:47 am
by El Turco
Stanford does make a good point but there are two sides to every story.