The BBWAA: arrogantly groupthinking since 1908
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 11:02 pm
This story's been going around the baseball blogosphere for a few days, so I thought i'd give it a thread:
BBTF Link
Basically, the BBWAA has started opening its doors to online baseball writers. Terrific, they're doing something that should have been done years ago. But there's one additional nugget of info: 16 of the 18 nominees got in. The two who didn't are Rob Neyer and Keith Law.
Now, the excuse is that Law and Neyer don't attend a minimum number of games during the season. Pretty stupid reasoning, if you ask me. Is there anything you can see high up in a press box that you can't on TV? And it's not like all of the members are doing game stories, which would require being at the stadium pre- and post-game.
You could also speculate that there's unmentioned reasons they weren't accepted. Neyer writes with a pretty open sabermetric bent, while Law's an outsider to journalism who primarily bases his opinions off of scouting. Neither one's prone to writing 20 articles a year about David Eckstein's epic whiteness; guess that wouldn't go over well in the old boys' club.
But there's plenty of room for Jim Caple, whose entire schtick is unfunny humor columns and hating the Yankees. And Jon Heyman, who spits out stupid opinions like clockwork.
Ugh. I wish people stopped giving a crap about these clods' consensus opinions.
BBTF Link
Basically, the BBWAA has started opening its doors to online baseball writers. Terrific, they're doing something that should have been done years ago. But there's one additional nugget of info: 16 of the 18 nominees got in. The two who didn't are Rob Neyer and Keith Law.
Now, the excuse is that Law and Neyer don't attend a minimum number of games during the season. Pretty stupid reasoning, if you ask me. Is there anything you can see high up in a press box that you can't on TV? And it's not like all of the members are doing game stories, which would require being at the stadium pre- and post-game.
You could also speculate that there's unmentioned reasons they weren't accepted. Neyer writes with a pretty open sabermetric bent, while Law's an outsider to journalism who primarily bases his opinions off of scouting. Neither one's prone to writing 20 articles a year about David Eckstein's epic whiteness; guess that wouldn't go over well in the old boys' club.
But there's plenty of room for Jim Caple, whose entire schtick is unfunny humor columns and hating the Yankees. And Jon Heyman, who spits out stupid opinions like clockwork.
Ugh. I wish people stopped giving a crap about these clods' consensus opinions.