Page 1 of 1
2008 Pennant Odds
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 5:15 am
by HMFFL
AL
Baltimore Orioles
50 - 1
Boston Red Sox
9 - 4
Chicago White Sox
12 - 1
Cleveland Indians
7 - 1
Detroit Tigers
7 - 2
Kansas City Royals
80 - 1
Los Angeles Angels
6 - 1
Minnesota Twins
15 - 1
New York Yankees
3 - 1
Oakland Athletics
50 - 1
Seattle Mariners
12 - 1
Tampa Bay Rays
100 - 1
Texas Rangers
50 - 1
Toronto Blue Jays
15 - 1
NL
Arizona Diamondbacks
6 - 1
Atlanta Braves
7 - 1
Chicago Cubs
4 - 1
Cincinnati Reds
15 - 1
Colorado Rockies
9 - 1
Florida Marlins
75 - 1
Houston Astros
20 - 1
Los Angeles Dodgers
7 - 1
Milwaukee Brewers
11 - 1
New York Mets
5 - 1
Philadelphia Phillies
5 - 1
Pittsburgh Pirates
75 - 1
San Diego Padres
9 - 1
San Francisco Giants
40 - 1
St Louis Cardinals
17 - 1
Washington Nationals
75 - 1
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:14 pm
by hermes
cubs 4-1
yes favorites
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:06 pm
by a-rod
^ You have a big payroll, you need to win
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:19 pm
by Da Schwab
a-rod wrote:^ You have a big payroll, you need to win
Thats quite funny coming from a person with the username 'a-rod', but I shouldn't talk.
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 10:25 pm
by risktaker91
15-1 odds for the Jays to win the AL. I guess theres still some chance.
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:07 pm
by a-rod
gunnabdaschwab09 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Thats quite funny coming from a person with the username 'a-rod', but I shouldn't talk.
your a Yankees fan too but I shouldn't talk
my Yankees won the Pennant for 8 consecutive years thats justify the big payroll.
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:22 am
by Posey H8er
2007 Payrolls
1 New York Yankees $195,229,045
2 Boston Red Sox $143,123,714
3 New York Mets $116,115,819
4 Chicago White Sox $109,290,167
5 Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim $109,251,333
6 Los Angeles Dodgers $108,704,524
7 Seattle Mariners $106,516,833
8 Chicago Cubs $99,936,999
The whole payroll issue is there becuase of the $300 million we spent last offseason. Half of which was basically Soriano.
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:56 am
by 34Celtic
How do the Tigers have less odds than the Yankees, IMO theyre the favorites to win it all...
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 am
by studcrackers
b/c they're the yankees, they'll probably get more action on the yankees and sox than the tigers
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:36 pm
by chrbal
34Celtic wrote:How do the Tigers have less odds than the Yankees, IMO theyre the favorites to win it all...
Jim Leyland paid off the odds makers to give him a reason to say "no one believes in us, so we're the underdogs" to his team.
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:54 pm
by mets87
34Celtic wrote:How do the Tigers have less odds than the Yankees, IMO theyre the favorites to win it all...
their pitching is...meh. i can't wait to see how dontrelle's 5 ERA in the NL translates to the AL.
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:36 pm
by hermes
maybe an 8?
ya i don't think willis is going to do very well in the AL
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:53 am
by risktaker91
I think Willis will have a strong year. And I agree, IMO the Tigers and red Sox are favourites to win the World Series.
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:11 am
by Bleeding Green
I like those odds for the D-Rays. Gonna be good this season.
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:37 am
by HCYanks
Yeah why the Orioles have double the odds of the D-Rays is beyond me. Shape up, Vegas.
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:17 pm
by craig01
HCYanks wrote:Yeah why the Orioles have double the odds of the D-Rays is beyond me. Shape up, Vegas.
Guess they haven't been keeping up these days.
Rays at 100-1.......why not throw a couple of greenies there ?
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:59 pm
by hermes
Bleeding Green wrote:I like those odds for the D-Rays. Gonna be good this season.