New Nike Uniforms Unveiled

xAIRNESSx · Post #1 » by **xAIRNESSx** » Wed Apr 4, 2012 4:22 pm

They're exactly the same, except for Seattle.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d8 ... l-32-teams
http://www.nfl.com/photos/09000d5d8280d ... 5d8280d924

Post #2 » by **Da Schwab** » Wed Apr 4, 2012 4:27 pm

The new Seattle designs are awful.

Post #3 » by **Nolan** » Wed Apr 4, 2012 5:13 pm

^
I actually like the new Seattle jerseys.

Paraglock · Post #4 » by **Paraglock** » Wed Apr 4, 2012 11:00 pm

I like how the Vikings and Bronoco's couldn't find one player to model the uniform.

Bucksfans1and2 · Post #5 » by **Bucksfans1and2** » Wed Apr 4, 2012 11:59 pm

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcnorth/post/_/id/40335/new-unis-packers-reject-all-changes

The Packers allowed absolutely no changes to their classic look, not even the most simple alteration in color or shade. The only difference is the Nike logo, according to spokesman Aaron Popkey.

Post #6 » by **Icness** » Thu Apr 5, 2012 1:12 pm

The Browns completely squashed any change too. The new Bengals gloves are selling real well.

Supposedly the fabric is a little more breathable.

I wonder how much this will hurt Reebok. Anyone out there got any Reeboks?

BIGGIEsmalls 23 · Post #7 » by **BIGGIEsmalls 23** » Thu Apr 5, 2012 1:53 pm

I like the Bears new look.

Icness wrote:The Browns completely squashed any change too. The new Bengals gloves are selling real well.

Supposedly the fabric is a little more breathable.

I wonder how much this will hurt Reebok. Anyone out there got any Reeboks?

Reebok is still fighting to continue selling Teebow apparel.

Reebok wants a ban lifted on its sale of apparel with the name of New York Jets quarterback Tim Tebow.

Reebok International Ltd. Tuesday asked a judge to end it. The company says it can prove it was not selling merchandise in violation of its expired 10-year licensing deal with the NFL.

The ban came after Nike Inc. filed a lawsuit last week, days after Tebow was traded from Denver to New York. Nike says in court papers it will lose a one-time opportunity if the ban on Reebok sales is lifted. Nike now has NFL licensing rights.

http://online.wsj.com/article/AP337c1e0 ... 52f4e.html

Post #8 » by **Da Schwab** » Fri Apr 6, 2012 2:13 am

That's a new look for the Bears?

RLakh23 · Post #9 » by **RLakh23** » Fri Apr 6, 2012 3:08 am

stripes cut; black v neck; text is slightly adjusted...

All are lot like last yr but 2 or 3 different things....

BIGGIEsmalls 23 · Post #10 » by **BIGGIEsmalls 23** » Fri Apr 6, 2012 3:19 am

Da Schwab wrote:That's a new look for the Bears?

These are the differences that one of our posters pointed out:

Friend_Of_Haley wrote:Big upgrade for the bears. Ever since the cut of jerseys pretty much eliminated sleeves the striping was inconsistent depending on where the player's jersey cut. Moving the numbers up allows for the stripes and gsh to be a prominent part of the uniform.

Interesting that I've read some repots say they've added a stripe when im not sure it was ever eliminated or just kept being cut off.

3 stripes in the 80's

3 stripes in the 90's, but one is basically part of the cuff

To current day where it seems they still use 3 stripes in an official capacity, but dont show up on the field (as the Urlacher pick above shows)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Here's another angle of the new ones: