Regular season:
65.5 quarterback rating, 50.1 completion percentage
Playoffs:
54.6 quarterback rating, 42.7 completion percentage
You could argue that, if the Colts had scored points in the Super Bowl, they would have won. It's hard to give Namath much credit, especially considering they had to beat only one NFL team. People use terms like great or legend to describe him, but realistically does he deserve it? Is he closer to John Elway or Jamarcus Russell?
Joe Namath
Moderator: bwgood77
Re: Joe Namath
- Da Schwab
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 33,823
- And1: 3,619
- Joined: Apr 19, 2005
- Location: Somewhere in the between.
- Contact:
-
Re: Joe Namath
Celtsfan1980 wrote:You could argue that, if the Colts had scored points in the Super Bowl, they would have won.
Hot take.
Re: Joe Namath
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 20,958
- And1: 483
- Joined: Dec 24, 2005
- Location: orlando
Re: Joe Namath
Namath had a couple of nice seasons.
Statistically, it was a different game back then .... and so were the offenses employed by teams along with the rules. So the passer ratings are skewed some.
That being said, I saw Namath play at his peak....really good arm, but his knee injuries destroyed his mobility....but was prone to interceptions.
IMO, is his legendary status as a QB overstated? Yes
However, he was huge as far as creating rock-star impact in the league.
Statistically, it was a different game back then .... and so were the offenses employed by teams along with the rules. So the passer ratings are skewed some.
That being said, I saw Namath play at his peak....really good arm, but his knee injuries destroyed his mobility....but was prone to interceptions.
IMO, is his legendary status as a QB overstated? Yes
However, he was huge as far as creating rock-star impact in the league.
Basketball is driven by three principles:
1) Movement 2) Application of fundamentals 3) Predictability
1) Movement 2) Application of fundamentals 3) Predictability
Re: Joe Namath
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,041
- And1: 4,468
- Joined: Mar 14, 2002
- Location: HOME OF THE 17 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!
Re: Joe Namath
HELL YEAH! Dudes a legemd! As soon as he tried to kiss suzie kolber on national television, he went bigtime!
Home of the 17 Time World Champions
Re: Joe Namath
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,853
- And1: 192
- Joined: Mar 25, 2008
Re: Joe Namath
craig01 wrote:However, he was huge as far as creating rock-star impact in the league.
Other than making his Super Bowl prediction and wearing pantyhose, what else did he do?
Re: Joe Namath
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 26,568
- And1: 4,194
- Joined: Jan 21, 2005
- Location: Dallas
Re: Joe Namath
Was a different time, you can't take the stats at face value. The average team threw more picks than TDs.
Re: Joe Namath
- Higga
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,877
- And1: 831
- Joined: Jan 29, 2007
- Location: Tyson's Corner, VA
Re: Joe Namath
CBS7 wrote:Was a different time, you can't take the stats at face value. The average team threw more picks than TDs.
Yep, the game was different then.
Still think Joe Namath is/was overrated but his guarantee is one of the signature moments in NFL history.
Eric Maynor is the worst basketball player I've ever seen.
Re: Joe Namath
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,853
- And1: 192
- Joined: Mar 25, 2008
Re: Joe Namath
CBS7 wrote:Was a different time, you can't take the stats at face value. The average team threw more picks than TDs.
Maybe quarterbacks are much more accurate passers today than they used to be? Defenders are considered faster and stronger than they used to be, so not all differences favor modern quarterbacks.
Re: Joe Namath
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 20,958
- And1: 483
- Joined: Dec 24, 2005
- Location: orlando
Re: Joe Namath
Back in the old days, receivers were pretty much mauled everywhere on the field.
West coast, and short game offenses did not exist, as 4-receiver sets didn't either. Teams played with a fullback back then.
The offensive mindset was to run/pass at a 40/20 ratio.
Namath was good, but his flamboyance along with a couple of good years has cemented him into a legendary status.
It's kind of hard to believe that he played at Alabama under Bear Bryant.
West coast, and short game offenses did not exist, as 4-receiver sets didn't either. Teams played with a fullback back then.
The offensive mindset was to run/pass at a 40/20 ratio.
Namath was good, but his flamboyance along with a couple of good years has cemented him into a legendary status.
It's kind of hard to believe that he played at Alabama under Bear Bryant.
Basketball is driven by three principles:
1) Movement 2) Application of fundamentals 3) Predictability
1) Movement 2) Application of fundamentals 3) Predictability
Return to The General NFL Board