2025 Draft thread

Moderator: bwgood77

User avatar
DOT
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,468
And1: 61,202
Joined: Nov 25, 2016
         

Re: 2025 Draft thread 

Post#121 » by DOT » Wed Mar 19, 2025 7:37 pm

Duke4life831 wrote:
DOT wrote:
Duke4life831 wrote:So what is the argument for Hunter over McMillan?

I really don’t care about the 2 way thing. Give me an elite WR or DB over just an okay WR/DB.

And when it comes to a WR prospect. I feel like McMillan is several tiers above Hunter.

I would say mostly it's a speed thing. Tet's only real numbers were in the 4.55 range, all hand timed at his pro day, which isn't good for a WR

Tet having middling speed limits his ceiling as a WR. People see him closer to Drake London (still a really good WR) than Mike Evans

I know more than a few draft guys who have Hunter as the #1 CB and the #1 WR, even assuming he only plays 1 position in the pros, which increases the number of teams who would theoretically draft him high, as both those positions are ones you only take high if you need them.


Does it though? Adams, Kupp, Thomas, Hopkins, AJ Brown (4.49 40), St Brown are all recent All Pro WRs who ran in the 4.5s or worse. McMillan is far bigger than any of those guys as well.

Yeah, that's why Tet is getting top 5 buzz. He's a really good WR prospect, and one of the 3 guys I want the Jags to take at 5 (assuming both Hunter and Carter are off the board, they're my 2 true blue chip guys who you take no matter what)

It's just that those guys are rarer and require a level of polish he doesn't have, where Hunter is on a similar level or even better of a route runner, but is faster and therefore a tad bit higher

It's like Malik Nabers vs Marvin Harrison Jr. last year, except Tet isn't nearly the route runner that Harrison was, so he'd go after Hunter even if Hunter was just a WR.
BaF Lakers:

Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela

Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
User avatar
azcatz11
RealGM
Posts: 31,433
And1: 35,108
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
Location: Phoenix
     

Re: 2025 Draft thread 

Post#122 » by azcatz11 » Wed Mar 19, 2025 7:55 pm

Mr B wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
Duke4life831 wrote:So what is the argument for Hunter over McMillan?

I really don’t care about the 2 way thing. Give me an elite WR or DB over just an okay WR/DB.

And when it comes to a WR prospect. I feel like McMillan is several tiers above Hunter.

I don't think teams are as enamored with T-Mac. I don't think he's going to be the 1st receiver to come off the board. I think Golden goes before him.

If that pushes Tet down to 12 I’d be cool with that.


He does not go by Tet. It is TMAC.
Praying for Burrow
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 33,051
And1: 16,583
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
Location: PNW
       

Re: 2025 Draft thread 

Post#123 » by Cactus Jack » Wed Mar 19, 2025 8:05 pm

azcatz11 wrote:
Mr B wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:I don't think teams are as enamored with T-Mac. I don't think he's going to be the 1st receiver to come off the board. I think Golden goes before him.

If that pushes Tet down to 12 I’d be cool with that.


He does not go by Tet. It is TMAC.

As someone who's followed him what's your outlook on him? I thought he played better in 2023.
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
User avatar
azcatz11
RealGM
Posts: 31,433
And1: 35,108
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
Location: Phoenix
     

Re: 2025 Draft thread 

Post#124 » by azcatz11 » Wed Mar 19, 2025 8:12 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:
Mr B wrote:If that pushes Tet down to 12 I’d be cool with that.


He does not go by Tet. It is TMAC.

As someone who's followed him what's your outlook on him? I thought he played better in 2023.


Hard to say IMO.

He ran a 4.48 at his pro day the other day or yesterday (can't remember) Arizona did not have a running game last year and we also had no good WR's other than him. It was basically Fifita throwing it to him every passing play.

He wins alot on 50/50 balls and clearly has deep speed however I think there is a question if he is Drake London 2.0 or maybe even a worse version of London since London is more explosive. Not that there is anything wrong with that but I'm not sure he's going to step right into an X receiver and be the type of guy you can have run an entire route tree.
Praying for Burrow
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 33,051
And1: 16,583
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
Location: PNW
       

Re: 2025 Draft thread 

Post#125 » by Cactus Jack » Wed Mar 19, 2025 8:16 pm

azcatz11 wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:
He does not go by Tet. It is TMAC.

As someone who's followed him what's your outlook on him? I thought he played better in 2023.


Hard to say IMO.

He ran a 4.48 at his pro day the other day or yesterday (can't remember) Arizona did not have a running game last year and we also had no good WR's other than him. It was basically Fifita throwing it to him every passing play.

He wins alot on 50/50 balls and clearly has deep speed however I think there is a question if he is Drake London 2.0 or maybe even a worse version of London since London is more explosive. Not that there is anything wrong with that but I'm not sure he's going to step right into an X receiver and be the type of guy you can have run an entire route tree.

Yeah, I think he's closer to being a #2 rather than a legit 1.
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 26,741
And1: 11,430
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: 2025 Draft thread 

Post#126 » by wco81 » Wed Mar 19, 2025 10:16 pm

Assuming that Millroe isn’t a head case like JaMarcus Russell, why wouldn’t he be able to do some of the things Hurts has done?

Of course Hurts is behind a dominant OL with great WRs, TE and RB.

I’m not saying some team will unlock his athleticism. But Allen fell in the draft because he didn’t have accuracy until his second year when he took an unprecedented jump.

A lot of what he does is still off schedule stuff. Same is true for Jackson too.

I don’t know if Millroe can be the playmakers they are. But he seems to have the physical tools.


It’s going to come down to the mental aspects of the game, especially after he’s coached up to at least make simple reads and the play caller giving him some defined reads.

Who knows though he wouldn’t be the first prospect with vey good physical tools who flame out in the NFL.

Sanders seems like a risk to me because of his physical limitations. Yet he may be a top 10 or even top 5 pick.

Bryce Young was the top pick of his draft, which should imply Multiple All-Pro or MVP contender. That seems unlikely.
User avatar
QB_Eagles
Analyst
Posts: 3,019
And1: 1,064
Joined: Jul 24, 2023
     

Re: 2025 Draft thread 

Post#127 » by QB_Eagles » Thu Mar 20, 2025 3:57 am

azcatz11 wrote:
Mr B wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:I don't think teams are as enamored with T-Mac. I don't think he's going to be the 1st receiver to come off the board. I think Golden goes before him.

If that pushes Tet down to 12 I’d be cool with that.


He does not go by Tet. It is TMAC.

I call him Tet Offensive because he will surprise people.
Mr B
RealGM
Posts: 18,198
And1: 5,373
Joined: Nov 20, 2014
         

Re: 2025 Draft thread 

Post#128 » by Mr B » Thu Mar 20, 2025 12:41 pm

azcatz11 wrote:
Mr B wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:I don't think teams are as enamored with T-Mac. I don't think he's going to be the 1st receiver to come off the board. I think Golden goes before him.

If that pushes Tet down to 12 I’d be cool with that.


He does not go by Tet. It is TMAC.

Yet somehow you knew exactly who I was talking about.
Mr B
RealGM
Posts: 18,198
And1: 5,373
Joined: Nov 20, 2014
         

Re: 2025 Draft thread 

Post#129 » by Mr B » Thu Mar 20, 2025 6:38 pm

Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=3KaI_3QT7XTTm5N8gt4yQg
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 33,051
And1: 16,583
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
Location: PNW
       

Re: 2025 Draft thread 

Post#130 » by Cactus Jack » Thu Mar 20, 2025 6:49 pm

Anyone here remember the Zack Wilson & Malik Willis Pro-days??
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
Jaydubb
Veteran
Posts: 2,816
And1: 989
Joined: Aug 15, 2023

Re: 2025 Draft thread 

Post#131 » by Jaydubb » Thu Mar 20, 2025 7:37 pm

Mr B wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=3KaI_3QT7XTTm5N8gt4yQg

Will be a nice pick for the eagles in the 2nd round.
Jaydubb
Veteran
Posts: 2,816
And1: 989
Joined: Aug 15, 2023

Re: 2025 Draft thread 

Post#132 » by Jaydubb » Thu Mar 20, 2025 7:39 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:Anyone here remember the Zack Wilson & Malik Willis Pro-days??

I bought the zack Wilson hype. Some of the throws he was making in college just looked insane.
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 33,051
And1: 16,583
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
Location: PNW
       

Re: 2025 Draft thread 

Post#133 » by Cactus Jack » Thu Mar 20, 2025 7:52 pm

Jaydubb wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:Anyone here remember the Zack Wilson & Malik Willis Pro-days??

I bought the zack Wilson hype. Some of the throws he was making in college just looked insane.

Wilson, Willis, Richardson...We see this all the time. So, why do people keep falling for it. :wink:

He can run really fast & his passes look great when throwing against air. But none of that really matters.
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
Jaydubb
Veteran
Posts: 2,816
And1: 989
Joined: Aug 15, 2023

2025 Draft thread 

Post#134 » by Jaydubb » Thu Mar 20, 2025 7:58 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:
Jaydubb wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:Anyone here remember the Zack Wilson & Malik Willis Pro-days??

I bought the zack Wilson hype. Some of the throws he was making in college just looked insane.

Wilson, Willis, Richardson...We see this all the time. So, why do people keep falling for it. :wink:

He can run really fast & throw the ball really far. Guess what? It doesn't always translate.

True. On a serious note, I think with quarterbacks it’s more important to see him in the film room dissecting plays, going through scenarios, and who should be the target against specific defenses.

College tape, film room/intellect, character, body type, then the athletic scores. But the athletic scores should be more of a “oh and by the way he can also run really fast” instead of “ohhh shitttt this guy runs a 4.37, we HAVE TO DRAFT HIM”. The athletic scores should be more of an afterthought than the main attraction.
Jaydubb
Veteran
Posts: 2,816
And1: 989
Joined: Aug 15, 2023

2025 Draft thread 

Post#135 » by Jaydubb » Thu Mar 20, 2025 8:01 pm

Maybe 15-20 years ago I used to really love looking up 40 times for the WR groups but then I saw that most of the top 40 times for WRs would eventually become busts.lol Raiders always draft the fastest guy and nowadays I just know he’s bound to be a bust lol
Mr B
RealGM
Posts: 18,198
And1: 5,373
Joined: Nov 20, 2014
         

Re: 2025 Draft thread 

Post#136 » by Mr B » Thu Mar 20, 2025 8:06 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:
Jaydubb wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:Anyone here remember the Zack Wilson & Malik Willis Pro-days??

I bought the zack Wilson hype. Some of the throws he was making in college just looked insane.

Wilson, Willis, Richardson...We see this all the time. So, why do people keep falling for it. :wink:

He can run really fast & his passes look great when throwing against air. But none of that really matters.

I tried to tell you. Every year there are QB’s who “sneak” into the 1st round. This year it’s looking like Jaxon Dart, Quinn Ewers, or Jalen Milroe could all “sneak” into the 1st round.
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 33,051
And1: 16,583
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
Location: PNW
       

Re: 2025 Draft thread 

Post#137 » by Cactus Jack » Thu Mar 20, 2025 8:28 pm

Mr B wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:Wilson, Willis, Richardson...We see this all the time. So, why do people keep falling for it. :wink:

He can run really fast & his passes look great when throwing against air. But none of that really matters.

I tried to tell you. Every year there are QB’s who “sneak” into the 1st round. This year it’s looking like Jaxon Dart, Quinn Ewers, or Jalen Milroe could all “sneak” into the 1st round.

1st Round? Ewers definitely won't. I have my doubts about Milroe. But it's possible. But none of those guys will go Top 10.
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
bluejerseyjinx
RealGM
Posts: 22,377
And1: 5,001
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
Location: Maine
       

Re: 2025 Draft thread 

Post#138 » by bluejerseyjinx » Fri Mar 21, 2025 1:38 pm

Jaydubb wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
Jaydubb wrote:I bought the zack Wilson hype. Some of the throws he was making in college just looked insane.

Wilson, Willis, Richardson...We see this all the time. So, why do people keep falling for it. :wink:

He can run really fast & throw the ball really far. Guess what? It doesn't always translate.

True. On a serious note, I think with quarterbacks it’s more important to see him in the film room dissecting plays, going through scenarios, and who should be the target against specific defenses.

College tape, film room/intellect, character, body type, then the athletic scores. But the athletic scores should be more of a “oh and by the way he can also run really fast” instead of “ohhh shitttt this guy runs a 4.37, we HAVE TO DRAFT HIM”. The athletic scores should be more of an afterthought than the main attraction.

:thumbsup: :bowdown:
bluejerseyjinx
RealGM
Posts: 22,377
And1: 5,001
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
Location: Maine
       

Re: 2025 Draft thread 

Post#139 » by bluejerseyjinx » Sun Mar 23, 2025 2:50 pm

azcatz11 wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:This is the most boring draft I can remember in awhile. It's all OL / DL dudes after the first 5 picks.

It's not a great draft compared to last year's. Not a ton of blue-chip caliber guys available. But if you need trench help than it's not bad. Good year for lineman.


I just don’t have much interest tbh. This could be a situation where the second and third rounds are far more interesting than round 1. Especially with the rb’s.

Seems like cam ward is basically a lock at #1.

I wish BJJ was here I want to hear his thoughts

That's because this year's draft is weak like Jack has been saying. Only 16 of the projected 32 players in this year's draft have round 1 grade evaluations. My feeling is is late round 1 and round 2 is where most of the surprises come from.
User avatar
azcatz11
RealGM
Posts: 31,433
And1: 35,108
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
Location: Phoenix
     

Re: 2025 Draft thread 

Post#140 » by azcatz11 » Sun Mar 23, 2025 2:55 pm

bluejerseyjinx wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:It's not a great draft compared to last year's. Not a ton of blue-chip caliber guys available. But if you need trench help than it's not bad. Good year for lineman.


I just don’t have much interest tbh. This could be a situation where the second and third rounds are far more interesting than round 1. Especially with the rb’s.

Seems like cam ward is basically a lock at #1.

I wish BJJ was here I want to hear his thoughts

That's because this year's draft is weak like Jack has been saying. Only 16 of the projected 32 players in this year's draft have round 1 grade evaluations. My feeling is is late round 1 and round 2 is where most of the surprises come from.


Todd mcshay is saying possibly 2 rbs in the top 15…
Praying for Burrow

Return to The General NFL Board