Smack talk thread?

bluejerseyjinx · Post #201 » by **bluejerseyjinx** » Sun Sep 4, 2016 12:20 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:Baseball?

First basketball and now baseball in a football forum. Time to find another place to post I guess. I guess some of the morons that post in here can't find there way to the proper rooms, wow.

Otis Driftwood · Post #202 » by **Otis Driftwood** » Sun Sep 4, 2016 12:30 pm

You seem angry. Miserable even.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

bluejerseyjinx · Post #203 » by **bluejerseyjinx** » Sun Sep 4, 2016 12:40 pm

There is nothing that pisses me off more when people are in here talking basketball and baseball in a football forum. I blame the moderators for this.

Otis Driftwood · Post #204 » by **Otis Driftwood** » Sun Sep 4, 2016 12:52 pm

Well... jwise and I have a little Houston/Dallas smack going right now so I guess you'll just need to overlook the baseball reference in lieu of the overall tenor of the topic.

Because after the Rangers sweep the pathetic Asstros today I'm sure I'll have something else.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

bluejerseyjinx · Post #205 » by **bluejerseyjinx** » Sun Sep 4, 2016 1:01 pm

I'm probably going to look for another forum to post. This seems to be an ongoing thing in here with this site and the moderators don't do anything about it. They have baseball and basketball forums here, why does it have to take place in a football forum?

Otis Driftwood · Post #206 » by **Otis Driftwood** » Sun Sep 4, 2016 1:26 pm

RIP Smack Talk

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Post #207 » by **bleu** » Sun Sep 4, 2016 5:11 pm

bluejerseyjinx wrote:I'm probably going to look for another forum to post. This seems to be an ongoing thing in here with this site and the moderators don't do anything about it. They have baseball and basketball forums here, why does it have to take place in a football forum?

Whoa there, talk about an overreaction. This is the first time I've ever seen baseball talked about on the football board. Calm down.

ErnieDiGregorio · Post #208 » by **ErnieDiGregorio** » Sun Sep 4, 2016 6:03 pm

Bo Jackson and Dion Sanders don't mind.
It's ok to be universal once in a while.
It might be one of those two.
It won't be the Cubs lol.

That's a joke, no one wants to see constant baseball in here either. The occasional reference won't harm you.

ErnieDiGregorio · Post #209 » by **ErnieDiGregorio** » Sun Sep 4, 2016 6:09 pm

Ok, the site is getting weird. I need to edit my incomplete post above but on my phone the edit tool won't show up.
I meant to say the Astros Rangers might win the Series but it won't be the Cubs.
And that'd the last I'll mention baseball

bluejerseyjinx · Post #210 » by **bluejerseyjinx** » Tue Sep 6, 2016 4:57 am

ErnieDiGregorio wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:
ErnieDiGregorio wrote:
no one cares,least of all,me.

I already know Fisher is gone during or after this season and I told you the tornado of Rams media overkill will then start.
Either Goff improves or they get another stud at QB..and they will get one. between 2017 and 2022 you are going to sick of all the Rams this and the Rams that in the news.

Another stud? LMAO here. Lets see if you can get one.

this is the first place i've seen that smiley lol.

deny all you want. That new stadium will be an espn and league office mother ship. There will be a winning team in that stadium and they will make sure of it.

Too bad you will have to share it. Come to Jerry's Palace and we'll show you how its done. Right down to the cheer leaders. !!!!!

ErnieDiGregorio · Post #211 » by **ErnieDiGregorio** » Wed Sep 7, 2016 11:26 pm

Cam was the entire offense last year.
They/he wont be that lucky or good this time. They didnt change the offense and the defense is weaker.

Post #212 » by **bleu** » Thu Sep 8, 2016 4:15 am

ErnieDiGregorio wrote:Cam was the entire offense last year.
They/he wont be that lucky or good this time. They didnt change the offense and the defense is weaker.

You know why? Cause he lost his top WR right before the season and was playing with scrubs. I know that you're just trolling because only a troll would imply that getting his WR1 back would make a quarterback worse. GTFO.

And don't even try to say for one second that Cam accounted for 4400 yards last year "because he was lucky".

Post #213 » by **Cactus Jack** » Thu Sep 8, 2016 4:19 am

bleu wrote:
ErnieDiGregorio wrote:Cam was the entire offense last year.
They/he wont be that lucky or good this time. They didnt change the offense and the defense is weaker.

You know why? Cause he lost his top WR right before the season and was playing with scrubs. I know that you're just trolling because only a troll would imply that getting his WR1 back would make a quarterback worse. GTFO.

And don't even try to say for one second that Cam accounted for 4400 yards last year "because he was lucky".

"Lucky"?

People use this term all the time with Russ. "He's so lucky" all the time. So, in other words, he's really good then!?

Post #214 » by **bleu** » Thu Sep 8, 2016 4:24 am

Cactus Jack wrote:
bleu wrote:
ErnieDiGregorio wrote:Cam was the entire offense last year.
They/he wont be that lucky or good this time. They didnt change the offense and the defense is weaker.

You know why? Cause he lost his top WR right before the season and was playing with scrubs. I know that you're just trolling because only a troll would imply that getting his WR1 back would make a quarterback worse. GTFO.

And don't even try to say for one second that Cam accounted for 4400 yards last year "because he was lucky".

"Lucky"?

People use this term all the time with Russ. "He's so lucky" all the time. So, in other words, he's really good then!?

Agreed. Claiming that any player is good or had a good game/season because of luck is one of the dumbest things you could possibly say, and automatically discredits your argument.

I'll be the first person to tell you that I don't think Cam will put up as huge of numbers as last year, but it's because they won't need him to. Last year they absolutely did.

Post #215 » by **Cactus Jack** » Thu Sep 8, 2016 4:28 am

bleu wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
bleu wrote:
You know why? Cause he lost his top WR right before the season and was playing with scrubs. I know that you're just trolling because only a troll would imply that getting his WR1 back would make a quarterback worse. GTFO.

And don't even try to say for one second that Cam accounted for 4400 yards last year "because he was lucky".

"Lucky"?

People use this term all the time with Russ. "He's so lucky" all the time. So, in other words, he's really good then!?

Agreed. Claiming that any player is good or had a good game/season because of luck is one of the dumbest things you could possibly say, and automatically discredits your argument.

I'll be the first person to tell you that I don't think Cam will put up as huge of numbers as last year, but it's because they won't need him to. Last year they absolutely did.

Btw, Cam isn't just lucky. That Boy is pretty good.

ErnieDiGregorio · Post #216 » by **ErnieDiGregorio** » Thu Sep 8, 2016 4:47 am

bleu wrote:
ErnieDiGregorio wrote:Cam was the entire offense last year.
They/he wont be that lucky or good this time. They didnt change the offense and the defense is weaker.

You know why? Cause he lost his top WR right before the season and was playing with scrubs. I know that you're just trolling because only a troll would imply that getting his WR1 back would make a quarterback worse. GTFO.

And don't even try to say for one second that Cam accounted for 4400 yards last year "because he was lucky".

I'm not trolling, I have never trolled. I speak truth only. I'm a grown man,not a 13 year old.
I dont care who's Cams wide receivers are or were. He was their only offense last year and everything went right.
This year it all collapses. And the defense wont have his 45 TD cushion to keep from looking regular and middle of the road against passing attacks.

And don't even try to say for one second that Cam accounted for 4400 yards last year "because he was lucky

if it was skill,he completely lost all touch with it on SB sunday. of course he was lucky, A QB doesnt run up the field that often and not get his face pounded without luck.
that stat shows a one man show. Notice the other teams had closer to 2000 yards on their own while the Panthers mustered 1000.
this year the Team wont be able to compensate for what Cam wont be able to do.
The Saints and Falcons defense is improved. Its going to a long season for little Mr. Superman.

on the bright side, I think its one of the coolest helmets in the NFL

Post #217 » by **bleu** » Thu Sep 8, 2016 4:52 am

Well ****. I hope one day I just happen to get really lucky and find myself making 22 million dollars a year to play football, and win an MVP while doing it. That would just be the craziest thing, huh? I better start looking for four leaf clovers so one day I might get so lucky.

ErnieDiGregorio · Post #218 » by **ErnieDiGregorio** » Thu Sep 8, 2016 5:25 am

bleu wrote:Well ****. I hope one day I just happen to get really lucky and find myself making 22 million dollars a year to play football, and win an MVP while doing it. That would just be the craziest thing, huh? I better start looking for four leaf clovers so one day I might get so lucky.

I'D rather be Shaun Hill. He gets paid lots to do nothing

Otis Driftwood · Post #219 » by **Otis Driftwood** » Thu Sep 8, 2016 11:55 am

Cam - lucky?

OK. If you say so.

<smh...>

Otis Driftwood · Post #220 » by **Otis Driftwood** » Thu Sep 8, 2016 11:56 am

ErnieDiGregorio wrote:
bleu wrote:Well ****. I hope one day I just happen to get really lucky and find myself making 22 million dollars a year to play football, and win an MVP while doing it. That would just be the craziest thing, huh? I better start looking for four leaf clovers so one day I might get so lucky.

I'D rather be Shaun Hill. He gets paid lots to do nothing

Not this year...