Worm Guts wrote:Duke4life831 wrote:El Turco wrote:
Sure, if you trust your franchise to come up with a quarterback. There are many franchises that have been waiting for a good franchise quarterback despite having many high picks.
Yup and the Vikings haven’t been able to find a franchise QB since Fran Tarkenton.
Outside of mediocrity with Tommy Kramer in the 80s and about 5 years of Culpepper. Vikings have just been a stopping ground for old vets on their last leg
Warren Moon, Jim McMahon, Randall Cunningham, Brett Favre, Gus Frerotte, McNab and so on. And a bunch of failed young QBs.
Don’t get me wrong, the Vikings are no Cleveland Browns when it comes to inability to find a QB. But I’d say Vikings have to be a bottom 5ish franchise when it comes to inability to find a franchise QB
In some ways, I prefer using older vets and known quantities. If a veteran QB stinks. you cut him and move on. When you draft a QB, you spend a minimum of 3 years trying to develop him, sometimes more. It's such a time sink.
Agreed. They had the, will they won’t they thing with Tavaris Jackson for a few years. Then the wasted years of watching Ponder and Teddy progress into nothing.
This is why I think moving on from Darnold was a big mistake. He was that perfect middle ground. No longer super young, 27 and had like 60 starts under his belt. But also wasn’t so old it was only looking like a 1-2 year stop gap. While also not having to break the bank to keep him.
I do think they should’ve kept him, traded JJ while his trade value why sky high before the draft. Then use those assets to improve the interior line.
Because that is Darnold’s major flaw. He handles pressure from the edges very well. Ya he will take an unnecessary sack from time to time, but he’s usually pretty damn good at stepping up in the pocket. It’s when he gets interior pressure, that’s when he goes back to the old “I’m seeing ghosts” Darnold.