Smack talk thread?

ErnieDiGregorio · Post #281 » by **ErnieDiGregorio** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 1:12 am

bluejerseyjinx wrote:They have good players but they have a Carson Palmer clone named, Matt Ryan.

you're saying all white QBs are the same?

Post #282 » by **Cactus Jack** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 1:32 am

ErnieDiGregorio wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:They have good players but they have a Carson Palmer clone named, Matt Ryan.

you're saying all white QBs are the same?

Yes, he's a closet racist. :lol:

bluejerseyjinx · Post #283 » by **bluejerseyjinx** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 2:56 am

Cowboys >>>> Falcons.

bluejerseyjinx · Post #284 » by **bluejerseyjinx** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 4:04 pm

ErnieDiGregorio wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:They have good players but they have a Carson Palmer clone named, Matt Ryan.

you're saying all white QBs are the same?

Race never even entered my mind when I made that post. So what you really trying to say? Wow.

bluejerseyjinx · Post #285 » by **bluejerseyjinx** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 4:29 pm

Cowboys/Seahawks >>>>>> Saints/Falcons.

ErnieDiGregorio · Post #286 » by **ErnieDiGregorio** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 5:07 pm

bluejerseyjinx wrote:Cowboys/Seahawks >>>>>> Saints/Falcons.

thats the appearance this week but it wont look that way deeper into season and of course the Falcons actually belong on the greater side even now

bluejerseyjinx · Post #287 » by **bluejerseyjinx** » Mon Oct 17, 2016 5:09 pm

Onward through the fog Ernie, onward through the fog, lol.

bluejerseyjinx · Post #288 » by **bluejerseyjinx** » Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:01 pm

ErnieDiGregorio wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:Cowboys/Seahawks >>>>>> Saints/Falcons.

thats the appearance this week but it wont look that way deeper into season and of course the Falcons actually belong on the greater side even now

Who's appearance? Mine or yours. You just have said for 3 straight weeks the Cowboy's suck and haven't played anyone yet. But the Falcons have, right?

ErnieDiGregorio · Post #289 » by **ErnieDiGregorio** » Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:11 pm

bluejerseyjinx wrote:
ErnieDiGregorio wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:Cowboys/Seahawks >>>>>> Saints/Falcons.

thats the appearance this week but it wont look that way deeper into season and of course the Falcons actually belong on the greater side even now

Who's appearance? Mine or yours. You just have said for 3 straight weeks the Cowboy's suck and haven't played anyone yet. But the Falcons have, right?

no the appearance ie your perception that you said Falcons,Bills werent that good. You are obviously wrong.

the Cowboys have a rookie QB so no matter what your bias is of him,he is still a weak link.
like I said: too many rookie QBs are doing too well early on which means the professional quality of the league is poor.

bluejerseyjinx · Post #290 » by **bluejerseyjinx** » Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:16 pm

There you go again twisting my words to support your fantasy island. I never said the Falcons or Bills sucked. I just said they were not playoff teams and there was no way the Bills would win the AFC east. Damn, what wrong with you?

Post #291 » by **Cactus Jack** » Wed Oct 19, 2016 12:48 am

Guys get a room already!

Otis Driftwood · Post #292 » by **Otis Driftwood** » Wed Oct 19, 2016 1:19 am

ErnieDiGregorio wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:
ErnieDiGregorio wrote:
thats the appearance this week but it wont look that way deeper into season and of course the Falcons actually belong on the greater side even now

Who's appearance? Mine or yours. You just have said for 3 straight weeks the Cowboy's suck and haven't played anyone yet. But the Falcons have, right?

no the appearance ie your perception that you said Falcons,Bills werent that good. You are obviously wrong.

the Cowboys have a rookie QB so no matter what your bias is of him,he is still a weak link.
like I said: too many rookie QBs are doing too well early on which means the professional quality of the league is poor.

Man - you can't even keep your crappy comments straight! Your quote from the NFC East thread...

get back to us when they beat teams better than the Bengals or Niners or Bears.

not impressive

So now we've gone from "they haven't played anyone good" to "rookie QB's demean the quality of the league".

This is why you have absolutely ZERO credibility around here. Just keep on grabbing ish out of the air. It's all you have.

ErnieDiGregorio · Post #293 » by **ErnieDiGregorio** » Wed Oct 19, 2016 2:47 am

Otis Driftwood wrote:
ErnieDiGregorio wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:Who's appearance? Mine or yours. You just have said for 3 straight weeks the Cowboy's suck and haven't played anyone yet. But the Falcons have, right?

no the appearance ie your perception that you said Falcons,Bills werent that good. You are obviously wrong.

the Cowboys have a rookie QB so no matter what your bias is of him,he is still a weak link.
like I said: too many rookie QBs are doing too well early on which means the professional quality of the league is poor.

Man - you can't even keep your crappy comments straight! Your quote from the NFC East thread...

get back to us when they beat teams better than the Bengals or Niners or Bears.

not impressive

So now we've gone from "they haven't played anyone good" to "rookie QB's demean the quality of the league".

This is why you have absolutely ZERO credibility around here. Just keep on grabbing ish out of the air. It's all you have.

where am I wrong? you cant prove me wrong on anything i said. You just disagree.
lol at equating mindless sports talk with lack of credibility. I havent lost s--t.
I'm making generalizations that can be argued true depending on your view.

how in the hell does one nullify the other? the league sucks all around if that many rookie qbs are succeeding,teams are weaker.
you can disagree if you want. It doesnt do anything to my credibility. Its quite a logical conclusion.
If I really had no idea what I was talking about I wouldnt be so high in this sites pickem out of the high number of people involved.
it proves that thinking outside your so called general football knowledge box is actually more beneficial and correct.

ErnieDiGregorio · Post #294 » by **ErnieDiGregorio** » Wed Oct 19, 2016 2:56 am

ErnieDiGregorio wrote:
Otis Driftwood wrote:
ErnieDiGregorio wrote:
no the appearance ie your perception that you said Falcons,Bills werent that good. You are obviously wrong.

the Cowboys have a rookie QB so no matter what your bias is of him,he is still a weak link.
like I said: too many rookie QBs are doing too well early on which means the professional quality of the league is poor.

Man - you can't even keep your crappy comments straight! Your quote from the NFC East thread...

get back to us when they beat teams better than the Bengals or Niners or Bears.

not impressive

So now we've gone from "they haven't played anyone good" to "rookie QB's demean the quality of the league".

This is why you have absolutely ZERO credibility around here. Just keep on grabbing ish out of the air. It's all you have.

where am I wrong? you cant prove me wrong on anything i said. You just disagree.
lol at equating mindless sports talk with lack of credibility. I havent lost s--t.
I'm making generalizations that can be argued true depending on your view.

how in the hell does one nullify the other? the league sucks all around if that many rookie qbs are succeeding,teams are weaker.
you can disagree if you want. It doesnt do anything to my credibility. Its quite a logical conclusion.
If I really had no idea what I was talking about I wouldnt be so high in this sites pickem out of the high number of people involved.
it proves that thinking outside your so called general football knowledge box is actually more beneficial and correct.

lost credibility? I said Buffalo and Falcons would do well before season started and Carolina would not do well and these things are happening. You didnt think or say that. My credibility is quite intact.
and by the way, those knocking the Colts, Saints, Jaguars at this point.. the redskins,Seahawks,and Texans started 2-4 last year and they made the playoffs.
lol dont try to challenge a knowledgeable 51 year old man with a memory and incredible research skills.

you dont be wanting to break dance battle in my house,buuoooyyy

good night MCA,where ever you are ...

bluejerseyjinx · Post #295 » by **bluejerseyjinx** » Wed Oct 19, 2016 5:15 am

Wow. I bet Ernie has one arm longer than the other so he can constantly pat himself on the back.

bluejerseyjinx · Post #296 » by **bluejerseyjinx** » Wed Oct 19, 2016 5:19 am

Otis Driftwood wrote:
ErnieDiGregorio wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:Who's appearance? Mine or yours. You just have said for 3 straight weeks the Cowboy's suck and haven't played anyone yet. But the Falcons have, right?

no the appearance ie your perception that you said Falcons,Bills werent that good. You are obviously wrong.

the Cowboys have a rookie QB so no matter what your bias is of him,he is still a weak link.
like I said: too many rookie QBs are doing too well early on which means the professional quality of the league is poor.

Man - you can't even keep your crappy comments straight! Your quote from the NFC East thread...

get back to us when they beat teams better than the Bengals or Niners or Bears.

not impressive

So now we've gone from "they haven't played anyone good" to "rookie QB's demean the quality of the league".

This is why you have absolutely ZERO credibility around here. Just keep on grabbing ish out of the air. It's all you have.

Doesn't Ernie remind you of drama queen know it all Malco? Come to think of it, at least he brought something to the table once in a while.

ErnieDiGregorio · Post #297 » by **ErnieDiGregorio** » Wed Oct 19, 2016 6:34 am

Doesn't Ernie remind you of drama queen know it all Malco? Come to think of it, at least he brought something to the table once in a while.

wrong, I made the table.

ErnieDiGregorio · Post #298 » by **ErnieDiGregorio** » Wed Oct 19, 2016 6:35 am

bluejerseyjinx wrote:
Otis Driftwood wrote:
ErnieDiGregorio wrote:
no the appearance ie your perception that you said Falcons,Bills werent that good. You are obviously wrong.

the Cowboys have a rookie QB so no matter what your bias is of him,he is still a weak link.
like I said: too many rookie QBs are doing too well early on which means the professional quality of the league is poor.

Man - you can't even keep your crappy comments straight! Your quote from the NFC East thread...

get back to us when they beat teams better than the Bengals or Niners or Bears.

not impressive

So now we've gone from "they haven't played anyone good" to "rookie QB's demean the quality of the league".

This is why you have absolutely ZERO credibility around here. Just keep on grabbing ish out of the air. It's all you have.

Doesn't Ernie remind you of drama queen know it all Malco? Come to think of it, at least he brought something to the table once in a while.

drama queens lie. I tell the straight truth

Otis Driftwood · Post #299 » by **Otis Driftwood** » Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:32 am

bluejerseyjinx wrote:Doesn't Ernie remind you of drama queen know it all Malco? Come to think of it, at least he brought something to the table once in a while.

Hell - at least Malco has legitimate points to make and is willing to take a stand on specific areas of contention without coming across as a Skip Bayless wannabe.

This idiot spends his time lobbing one handful of **** after another at every wall of the forum hoping something will stick and allow him to point and say "See - I was right about that ****!" Thing is - he might actually have something of value to say that would actually contribute to the forum but all this other noise coming from him completely makes him lack any credibility whatsoever.

bluejerseyjinx · Post #300 » by **bluejerseyjinx** » Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:51 pm

I like to have fun and joke around as much as anyone, but this guy lives in his own idealistic bubble.