Coaches thread

hermes · Post #321 » by **hermes** » Sun Jan 19, 2025 7:03 pm

maybe we all could just drop it

everyone just believe what they want to believe and we don't ever have to talk about it again

Mariner · Post #322 » by **Mariner** » Sun Jan 19, 2025 7:16 pm

QB_Eagles wrote:
Mr B wrote:
QB_Eagles wrote:I'm just confused if the Lions are losers, whose season went just like the Panthers; what qualifies Aaron Glenn to become a head coach but not Ejiro Evero?

Evero is winner, too, because he was part of the Rams coaching staff that won the SB in the 2021 season.

You’re never going to win this argument, you know that right? You will never be able to convince people that losing in the playoffs is the same as winning the Super Bowl.

That's not my argument.

Your argument is that every team that didn't win the SB is on the same level of loser.

Reality clearly disagrees with your take (as evidenced by the HC hiring process), and I do as well.

We all know your argument is just cope for your Cowboys' abysmal playoff performance over the last 29 seasons.

If you admit to that, I will drop the topic.

You dropping or not dropping the topic is irrelevant.
Your HC hiring argument is a terribly flawed argument.
It’s not a contradiction to understand a team failed but to want to poach one specific area of it.
The bengals were losers this year. No different than the Titans. That doesn’t mean teams don’t want Chase. lol

QB_Eagles · Post #323 » by **QB_Eagles** » Sun Jan 19, 2025 7:33 pm

Mariner wrote:
QB_Eagles wrote:
Mr B wrote:You’re never going to win this argument, you know that right? You will never be able to convince people that losing in the playoffs is the same as winning the Super Bowl.

That's not my argument.

Your argument is that every team that didn't win the SB is on the same level of loser.

Reality clearly disagrees with your take (as evidenced by the HC hiring process), and I do as well.

We all know your argument is just cope for your Cowboys' abysmal playoff performance over the last 29 seasons.

If you admit to that, I will drop the topic.

You dropping or not dropping the topic is irrelevant.
Your HC hiring argument is a terribly flawed argument.
It’s not a contradiction to understand a team failed but to want to poach one specific area of it.
The bengals were losers this year. No different than the Titans. That doesn’t mean teams don’t want Chase. lol

Why? Did Chase achieve something significant despite losing?

Mariner · Post #324 » by **Mariner** » Sun Jan 19, 2025 7:36 pm

QB_Eagles wrote:
Mariner wrote:
QB_Eagles wrote:That's not my argument.

Your argument is that every team that didn't win the SB is on the same level of loser.

Reality clearly disagrees with your take (as evidenced by the HC hiring process), and I do as well.

We all know your argument is just cope for your Cowboys' abysmal playoff performance over the last 29 seasons.

If you admit to that, I will drop the topic.

You dropping or not dropping the topic is irrelevant.
Your HC hiring argument is a terribly flawed argument.
It’s not a contradiction to understand a team failed but to want to poach one specific area of it.
The bengals were losers this year. No different than the Titans. That doesn’t mean teams don’t want Chase. lol

Why? Did Chase achieve something significant despite losing?

Very simple. Evaluating a team is much different than an individual.
Not a contradiction to be a HOF and be on a losing team
Got anything else?

Mr B · Post #325 » by **Mr B** » Sun Jan 19, 2025 8:00 pm

hermes wrote:maybe we all could just drop it

everyone just believe what they want to believe and we don't ever have to talk about it again

Amen brother. Dude can’t let it go.

Mr B · Post #326 » by **Mr B** » Sun Jan 19, 2025 8:02 pm

Mariner wrote:
QB_Eagles wrote:
Mariner wrote:You dropping or not dropping the topic is irrelevant.
Your HC hiring argument is a terribly flawed argument.
It’s not a contradiction to understand a team failed but to want to poach one specific area of it.
The bengals were losers this year. No different than the Titans. That doesn’t mean teams don’t want Chase. lol

Why? Did Chase achieve something significant despite losing?

Very simple. Evaluating a team is much different than an individual.
Not a contradiction to be a HOF and be on a losing team
Got anything else?

Dude is dense than a MF.

RaoulDuke79 · Post #327 » by **RaoulDuke79** » Sun Jan 19, 2025 8:27 pm

Slowik/Strausser gone yet?

Post #328 » by **Cactus Jack** » Sun Jan 19, 2025 8:31 pm

RaoulDuke79 wrote:Slowik/Strausser gone yet?

Slowik's stock fell maybe faster than anyone.

QB_Eagles · Post #329 » by **QB_Eagles** » Sun Jan 19, 2025 9:18 pm

Mariner wrote:
QB_Eagles wrote:
Mariner wrote:You dropping or not dropping the topic is irrelevant.
Your HC hiring argument is a terribly flawed argument.
It’s not a contradiction to understand a team failed but to want to poach one specific area of it.
The bengals were losers this year. No different than the Titans. That doesn’t mean teams don’t want Chase. lol

Why? Did Chase achieve something significant despite losing?

Very simple. Evaluating a team is much different than an individual.
Not a contradiction to be a HOF and be on a losing team
Got anything else?

Hmm, that's interesting. Last time we had this discussion, the exception for individuals didn't exist yet. Mr B said Dan Marino is a loser as opposed to Trent Dilfer.

Mariner · Post #330 » by **Mariner** » Sun Jan 19, 2025 9:30 pm

QB_Eagles wrote:
Mariner wrote:
QB_Eagles wrote:Why? Did Chase achieve something significant despite losing?

Very simple. Evaluating a team is much different than an individual.
Not a contradiction to be a HOF and be on a losing team
Got anything else?

Hmm, that's interesting. Last time we had this discussion, the exception for individuals didn't exist yet. Mr B said Dan Marino is a loser as opposed to Trent Dilfer.

Well if you go by SBs yes he’s a loser. QBs have that burden. The Miami SB appearance means nothing.

JujitsuFlip · Post #331 » by **JujitsuFlip** » Mon Jan 20, 2025 5:51 pm

Idk anything about him or his scheme but Bill Callahan is well respected around the league, so learning under him is a plus.

Post #332 » by **Cactus Jack** » Mon Jan 20, 2025 6:34 pm

Read on Twitter

Post #333 » by **DOT** » Mon Jan 20, 2025 8:57 pm

Read on Twitter

F*ckin Trent Baalke, man.

Post #334 » by **Cactus Jack** » Mon Jan 20, 2025 9:17 pm

Read on Twitter

Post #335 » by **Cactus Jack** » Mon Jan 20, 2025 9:17 pm

Read on Twitter

Mr B · Post #336 » by **Mr B** » Mon Jan 20, 2025 9:20 pm

I hope this hire works out for the Bears. I’d like to see them develop Caleb Williams and see him turn into one of the better QB’s in the league.

Post #337 » by **Cactus Jack** » Mon Jan 20, 2025 9:20 pm

My money is on Carroll landing the Raiders job.

Post #338 » by **Cactus Jack** » Mon Jan 20, 2025 9:27 pm

DOT wrote:F*ckin Trent Baalke, man.

It sounds like the Jags are leaning Liam Coen or Joe Brady.

Mr B · Post #339 » by **Mr B** » Mon Jan 20, 2025 10:24 pm

This one actually hurts. This guy is a damn good ST coach.

Read on Twitter

?s=46&t=3KaI_3QT7XTTm5N8gt4yQg

Post #340 » by **DOT** » Mon Jan 20, 2025 10:38 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:
DOT wrote:F*ckin Trent Baalke, man.

It sounds like the Jags are leaning Liam Coen or Joe Brady.

I don't hate either of those guys, I think Coen is being overshadowed by Johnson in that he's done similar things with less talent on the roster, but it's just ridiculous that we're not doing a clean sweep after the season we had.