Cactus Jack wrote:El Turco wrote:Cactus Jack wrote:They we're never going to get that return. But I still think best case they might have been able to get a late 1st if things had gone differently. But they wanted to resolve it asap & settled for a 2nd. Which is fine. It's not a great return. But it's fair compensation for the most part. Now, they don't have to deal with any more drama this offseason involving him & the team can plan accordingly.
Yeah I think it is a good move by Seattle, I am also in the camp of not paying receivers unless it is Jefferson, Chase or Mooney. There are many B, B+ type of receivers and more coming in the league every year. Supply is above demand, good athletes choosing to play receiver instead of some of the other positions that get paid less and have more wear and tear.
Seattle is on the right path if they dont sign Darnold or another high priced quarterback.
They'll probably sign Darold as a short-term stopgap. But reshaping the roster was necessary if they planned on competing long-term. Now they have the opportunity to reset & build a roster properly.
That would undo much of the moves, Darnold is not going to give you anything except for worse picks and take up cap space. Use your cap and high picks next draft to build your line and defense, then see which quarterback available next year.