NotaHypeJob wrote:shangrila wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:People are really missing the significance of this. By coming public with clear evidence of just what a mockery teams are making of hte Rooney Rule(something we've know forever but now he's forcing things), its showing the whole rule is worthless and that white owners are going to keep hiring white coaches they feel comfortable with which is denying opportunities to potentially qualifed candidates.
And the irony of the Rooney Rule coming from the Steelers owners who interviewed a black man seen as underqualified at the time but who blew them away and has now been their head coach forever and his next losing season will be his first one....
But you can see it itt, lots of white people simply don't believe the most qualified candidate can be a black man or that they deserve an actual opportunity to be considered instead of just a token check box.
Flores is going to lose, becaue too many people make too much money off the NFL and when you challenge the shield you lose. But he, like Kap is a good man for sacrificing his career for something bigger than just him. This will have an impact, especially if as this is a class action he can get others to join. Guys like Caldwell or Lewis or Dungy whose coaching careers are probably over anyway certainly have their own stories about being the token interview. As do countless assistants of course but many of them will be loathe to because it will derail their career.
This is real, and its a problem. It's not just oh we love this one coach. Access matters.
Jesus that's a hell of a reach
Not at all, you have people itt being willfully obtuse about just hiring the "best candidate" when it's statistically impossible for 30 out of 32 head coaches to be white in a sport that's played 70% by minorities.
And herein lies the problem; it is in no way, shape or form statistically
impossible. Improbable? Maybe, but far, far from impossible.
Additionally, there's this weird assumption that because minorities are over-represented in certain sports that that should then translate to management/coaching. Even if there are transferable skills these are still different fields, so that over-representation was never guaranteed to translate nor is that a clear sign of racism.
But beyond all that, nobody in this thread (that I saw at least, though I'm happy to be proven wrong) stated anything close to "a black man can't be the most qualified candidate" or "deserve an actual opportunity" as Chuck said which is what I was clearly responding to. Simply asking where the racist discrimination has occurred IN THIS CASE doesn't make you a racist, nor does it mean people think racism doesn't exist.
Assuming not only that anyone who didn't immediately believe this is racism is not only racist themselves but also white is...disturbing, frankly, and why I tend to avoid political discussions these days.
EDIT: Just saw the mod post above. I'll leave my post as is as my response to being directly quoted but won't continue beyond it.